Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The effects of treatment with oral capecitabine vs. bolus 5-FU, administered concurrently with preoperative radiotherapy, were compared in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). One hundred and twenty-seven patients with LARC received concurrent preoperative chemoradiation using two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae-Sung, Kim, Jun-Sang, Cho, Moon-June, Yoon, Wan-Hee, Song, Kye-Sang
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2733979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16479065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.52
_version_ 1782171122263916544
author Kim, Jae-Sung
Kim, Jun-Sang
Cho, Moon-June
Yoon, Wan-Hee
Song, Kye-Sang
author_facet Kim, Jae-Sung
Kim, Jun-Sang
Cho, Moon-June
Yoon, Wan-Hee
Song, Kye-Sang
author_sort Kim, Jae-Sung
collection PubMed
description The effects of treatment with oral capecitabine vs. bolus 5-FU, administered concurrently with preoperative radiotherapy, were compared in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). One hundred and twenty-seven patients with LARC received concurrent preoperative chemoradiation using two cycles bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)/day) plus leucovorin (LV, 20 mg/m(2)/day) (Group I). Another LARC group received concurrent chemoradiation using two cycles 1,650 mg/m(2)/day of oral capecitabine and 20 mg/m(2)/day of LV (Group II, 97 patients). Radiation was delivered to the primary tumor at 50.4 Gy in both groups. Definitive surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. A pathologic complete remission was achieved in 11.4% of patients in Group I and in 22.2% of patients in Group II (p=0.042). The down-staging rates of the primary tumor and lymph nodes were 39.0/68.7% in Group I and 61.1/87.5% in Group II (p=0.002/0.005). Sphincter-preserving surgery was possible in 42.1% of patients in Group I and 66.7% of those in Group II (p=0.021). Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, diarrhea, and radiation dermatitis were statistically more prevalent in Group I than in Group II, while the opposite was true for grade 3 hand-foot syndrome. Preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine was better tolerated than bolus 5-FU and was more effective in the promotion of both down-staging and sphincter preservation in patients with LARC.
format Text
id pubmed-2733979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27339792009-08-31 Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Jun-Sang Cho, Moon-June Yoon, Wan-Hee Song, Kye-Sang J Korean Med Sci Original Article The effects of treatment with oral capecitabine vs. bolus 5-FU, administered concurrently with preoperative radiotherapy, were compared in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). One hundred and twenty-seven patients with LARC received concurrent preoperative chemoradiation using two cycles bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)/day) plus leucovorin (LV, 20 mg/m(2)/day) (Group I). Another LARC group received concurrent chemoradiation using two cycles 1,650 mg/m(2)/day of oral capecitabine and 20 mg/m(2)/day of LV (Group II, 97 patients). Radiation was delivered to the primary tumor at 50.4 Gy in both groups. Definitive surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. A pathologic complete remission was achieved in 11.4% of patients in Group I and in 22.2% of patients in Group II (p=0.042). The down-staging rates of the primary tumor and lymph nodes were 39.0/68.7% in Group I and 61.1/87.5% in Group II (p=0.002/0.005). Sphincter-preserving surgery was possible in 42.1% of patients in Group I and 66.7% of those in Group II (p=0.021). Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, diarrhea, and radiation dermatitis were statistically more prevalent in Group I than in Group II, while the opposite was true for grade 3 hand-foot syndrome. Preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine was better tolerated than bolus 5-FU and was more effective in the promotion of both down-staging and sphincter preservation in patients with LARC. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2006-02 2006-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2733979/ /pubmed/16479065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.52 Text en Copyright © 2006 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jae-Sung
Kim, Jun-Sang
Cho, Moon-June
Yoon, Wan-Hee
Song, Kye-Sang
Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of oral capecitabine versus bolus 5-fu in preoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2733979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16479065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.52
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaesung comparisonoftheefficacyoforalcapecitabineversusbolus5fuinpreoperativeradiotherapyoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kimjunsang comparisonoftheefficacyoforalcapecitabineversusbolus5fuinpreoperativeradiotherapyoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT chomoonjune comparisonoftheefficacyoforalcapecitabineversusbolus5fuinpreoperativeradiotherapyoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT yoonwanhee comparisonoftheefficacyoforalcapecitabineversusbolus5fuinpreoperativeradiotherapyoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT songkyesang comparisonoftheefficacyoforalcapecitabineversusbolus5fuinpreoperativeradiotherapyoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer