Cargando…

Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals

Following recent studies, the automatic analysis of intracranial pressure (ICP) pulses appears to be a promising tool for forecasting critical intracranial and cerebrovascular pathophysiological variations during the management of many disorders. A pulse analysis framework has been recently develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scalzo, Fabien, Xu, Peng, Asgari, Shadnaz, Bergsneider, Marvin, Hu, Xiao
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19578916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0505-5
_version_ 1782171142789791744
author Scalzo, Fabien
Xu, Peng
Asgari, Shadnaz
Bergsneider, Marvin
Hu, Xiao
author_facet Scalzo, Fabien
Xu, Peng
Asgari, Shadnaz
Bergsneider, Marvin
Hu, Xiao
author_sort Scalzo, Fabien
collection PubMed
description Following recent studies, the automatic analysis of intracranial pressure (ICP) pulses appears to be a promising tool for forecasting critical intracranial and cerebrovascular pathophysiological variations during the management of many disorders. A pulse analysis framework has been recently developed to automatically extract morphological features of ICP pulses. The algorithm is able to enhance the quality of ICP signals, to segment ICP pulses, and to designate the locations of the three ICP sub-peaks in a pulse. This paper extends this algorithm by utilizing machine learning techniques to replace Gaussian priors used in the peak designation process with more versatile regression models. The experimental evaluations are conducted on a database of ICP signals built from 700 h of recordings from 64 neurosurgical patients. A comparative analysis of different state-of-the-art regression analysis methods is conducted and the best approach is then compared to the original pulse analysis algorithm. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in terms of accuracy in favor of our regression-based recognition framework. It reaches an average peak designation accuracy of 99% using a kernel spectral regression against 93% for the original algorithm. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11517-009-0505-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Text
id pubmed-2734262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27342622009-09-02 Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals Scalzo, Fabien Xu, Peng Asgari, Shadnaz Bergsneider, Marvin Hu, Xiao Med Biol Eng Comput Original Article Following recent studies, the automatic analysis of intracranial pressure (ICP) pulses appears to be a promising tool for forecasting critical intracranial and cerebrovascular pathophysiological variations during the management of many disorders. A pulse analysis framework has been recently developed to automatically extract morphological features of ICP pulses. The algorithm is able to enhance the quality of ICP signals, to segment ICP pulses, and to designate the locations of the three ICP sub-peaks in a pulse. This paper extends this algorithm by utilizing machine learning techniques to replace Gaussian priors used in the peak designation process with more versatile regression models. The experimental evaluations are conducted on a database of ICP signals built from 700 h of recordings from 64 neurosurgical patients. A comparative analysis of different state-of-the-art regression analysis methods is conducted and the best approach is then compared to the original pulse analysis algorithm. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in terms of accuracy in favor of our regression-based recognition framework. It reaches an average peak designation accuracy of 99% using a kernel spectral regression against 93% for the original algorithm. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11517-009-0505-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2009-07-04 2009-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2734262/ /pubmed/19578916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0505-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2009
spellingShingle Original Article
Scalzo, Fabien
Xu, Peng
Asgari, Shadnaz
Bergsneider, Marvin
Hu, Xiao
Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
title Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
title_full Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
title_fullStr Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
title_full_unstemmed Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
title_short Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
title_sort regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19578916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0505-5
work_keys_str_mv AT scalzofabien regressionanalysisforpeakdesignationinpulsatilepressuresignals
AT xupeng regressionanalysisforpeakdesignationinpulsatilepressuresignals
AT asgarishadnaz regressionanalysisforpeakdesignationinpulsatilepressuresignals
AT bergsneidermarvin regressionanalysisforpeakdesignationinpulsatilepressuresignals
AT huxiao regressionanalysisforpeakdesignationinpulsatilepressuresignals