Cargando…
A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
BACKGROUND: The high diversity of ornamentation type in pollen grains of angiosperms has often been suggested to be linked to diversity in pollination systems. It is commonly stated that smooth pollen grains are associated with wind or water pollination while sculptured pollen grains are associated...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19624836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-145 |
_version_ | 1782171225503563776 |
---|---|
author | Sannier, Julie Baker, William J Anstett, Marie-Charlotte Nadot, Sophie |
author_facet | Sannier, Julie Baker, William J Anstett, Marie-Charlotte Nadot, Sophie |
author_sort | Sannier, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The high diversity of ornamentation type in pollen grains of angiosperms has often been suggested to be linked to diversity in pollination systems. It is commonly stated that smooth pollen grains are associated with wind or water pollination while sculptured pollen grains are associated with biotic pollination. We tested the statistical significance of an association between pollen ornamentation and pollination system in two families of the monocotyledons, the Araceae and the Arecaceae, taking into account the phylogenetic framework. FINDINGS: Character optimization was carried out with the Maximum Parsimony method and two different methods of comparative analysis were used: the Concentrated-Change test and the Discrete method. The ancestral ornamentation in Araceae is foveolate/reticulate. It is probably the same in Arecaceae. The ancestral flowers of Araceae were pollinated by beetles while ancestral pollination in Arecaceae is equivocal. A correlation between ornamentation type and pollination was highlighted in Araceae although the results slightly differ depending on the method and the options chosen for performing the analyses. No correlation was found in palms. CONCLUSION: In this study, we show that the relationships between the ornamentation type and the pollination system depend on the family and hence vary among taxonomic groups. We also show that the method chosen may strongly influence the results. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2734846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27348462009-08-29 A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots Sannier, Julie Baker, William J Anstett, Marie-Charlotte Nadot, Sophie BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: The high diversity of ornamentation type in pollen grains of angiosperms has often been suggested to be linked to diversity in pollination systems. It is commonly stated that smooth pollen grains are associated with wind or water pollination while sculptured pollen grains are associated with biotic pollination. We tested the statistical significance of an association between pollen ornamentation and pollination system in two families of the monocotyledons, the Araceae and the Arecaceae, taking into account the phylogenetic framework. FINDINGS: Character optimization was carried out with the Maximum Parsimony method and two different methods of comparative analysis were used: the Concentrated-Change test and the Discrete method. The ancestral ornamentation in Araceae is foveolate/reticulate. It is probably the same in Arecaceae. The ancestral flowers of Araceae were pollinated by beetles while ancestral pollination in Arecaceae is equivocal. A correlation between ornamentation type and pollination was highlighted in Araceae although the results slightly differ depending on the method and the options chosen for performing the analyses. No correlation was found in palms. CONCLUSION: In this study, we show that the relationships between the ornamentation type and the pollination system depend on the family and hence vary among taxonomic groups. We also show that the method chosen may strongly influence the results. BioMed Central 2009-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2734846/ /pubmed/19624836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-145 Text en Copyright © 2009 Sannier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Sannier, Julie Baker, William J Anstett, Marie-Charlotte Nadot, Sophie A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
title | A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
title_full | A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
title_short | A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
title_sort | comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the araceae and the arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19624836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sannierjulie acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT bakerwilliamj acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT anstettmariecharlotte acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT nadotsophie acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT sannierjulie comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT bakerwilliamj comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT anstettmariecharlotte comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots AT nadotsophie comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots |