Cargando…

Intensification to biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30, NovoMix® 30) can improve glycaemic control in patients treated with basal insulins: a subgroup analysis of the IMPROVE™ observational study

AIMS: The international IMPROVE™ observational study investigated the safety profile and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in the routine treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. We present analyses for the subgroup of patients who switched from basal insulin to BIAsp 30....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gumprecht, J, Benroubi, M, Borzi, V, Kawamori, R, Shaban, J, Shah, S, Shestakova, M, Wenying, Y, Ligthelm, R, Valensi, P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19504715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02064.x
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: The international IMPROVE™ observational study investigated the safety profile and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in the routine treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. We present analyses for the subgroup of patients who switched from basal insulin to BIAsp 30. METHODS: Patients in routine care who started insulin therapy with or switched to BIAsp 30 from existing insulin regimens were eligible for this 26-week study. This analysis includes only patients previously treated with basal insulin. Outcomes including adverse events, hypoglycaemic events and glycaemic profile were recorded from patients’ notes, recall and diaries. RESULTS: Of the 748 patients included (age 59.7 ± 11.8 years, diabetes duration 11.4 ± 7.3 years, baseline HbA(1c) 9.1 ± 1.6%), 497 were previously using human neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and 245 analogue basal insulin. Overall, major and minor hypoglycaemia rates decreased from baseline to final visit (major: 0.171 to 0.011; minor: 9.70 to 5.89 events/patient-year) and were similar between the subgroups. HbA(1c) and fasting blood glucose were significantly reduced from baseline (NPH prestudy: −1.6%, −2.4 mmol/l; analogue basal prestudy: −1.8%, −2.4 mmol/l), as was postprandial blood glucose, with 33.8% of patients achieving the HbA(1c) target < 7% without hypoglycaemia. Insulin dose increased slightly from prestudy (0.33 ± 0.21 U/kg), baseline (0.40 ± 0.20 U/kg) to final visit (0.52 ± 0.26 U/kg); most patients (76%) followed a twice-daily regimen at final visit. Body weight did not change significantly and treatment satisfaction increased. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulins may improve their glycaemic control by intensification to BIAsp 30 therapy.