Cargando…

Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model

BACKGROUND: Routine surveillance of disease notification data can enable the early detection of localised disease outbreaks. Although hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been recognised as an appropriate method to model disease surveillance data, they have been rarely applied in public health practice....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watkins, Rochelle E, Eagleson, Serryn, Veenendaal, Bert, Wright, Graeme, Plant, Aileen J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-39
_version_ 1782171244889636864
author Watkins, Rochelle E
Eagleson, Serryn
Veenendaal, Bert
Wright, Graeme
Plant, Aileen J
author_facet Watkins, Rochelle E
Eagleson, Serryn
Veenendaal, Bert
Wright, Graeme
Plant, Aileen J
author_sort Watkins, Rochelle E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine surveillance of disease notification data can enable the early detection of localised disease outbreaks. Although hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been recognised as an appropriate method to model disease surveillance data, they have been rarely applied in public health practice. We aimed to develop and evaluate a simple flexible HMM for disease surveillance which is suitable for use with sparse small area count data and requires little baseline data. METHODS: A Bayesian HMM was designed to monitor routinely collected notifiable disease data that are aggregated by residential postcode. Semi-synthetic data were used to evaluate the algorithm and compare outbreak detection performance with the established Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS) algorithms and a negative binomial cusum. RESULTS: Algorithm performance varied according to the desired false alarm rate for surveillance. At false alarm rates around 0.05, the cusum-based algorithms provided the best overall outbreak detection performance, having similar sensitivity to the HMMs and a shorter average time to detection. At false alarm rates around 0.01, the HMM algorithms provided the best overall outbreak detection performance, having higher sensitivity than the cusum-based Methods and a generally shorter time to detection for larger outbreaks. Overall, the 14-day HMM had a significantly greater area under the receiver operator characteristic curve than the EARS C3 and 7-day negative binomial cusum algorithms. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the HMM provides an effective method for the surveillance of sparse small area notifiable disease data at low false alarm rates. Further investigations are required to evaluation algorithm performance across other diseases and surveillance contexts.
format Text
id pubmed-2735038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27350382009-09-01 Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model Watkins, Rochelle E Eagleson, Serryn Veenendaal, Bert Wright, Graeme Plant, Aileen J BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Routine surveillance of disease notification data can enable the early detection of localised disease outbreaks. Although hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been recognised as an appropriate method to model disease surveillance data, they have been rarely applied in public health practice. We aimed to develop and evaluate a simple flexible HMM for disease surveillance which is suitable for use with sparse small area count data and requires little baseline data. METHODS: A Bayesian HMM was designed to monitor routinely collected notifiable disease data that are aggregated by residential postcode. Semi-synthetic data were used to evaluate the algorithm and compare outbreak detection performance with the established Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS) algorithms and a negative binomial cusum. RESULTS: Algorithm performance varied according to the desired false alarm rate for surveillance. At false alarm rates around 0.05, the cusum-based algorithms provided the best overall outbreak detection performance, having similar sensitivity to the HMMs and a shorter average time to detection. At false alarm rates around 0.01, the HMM algorithms provided the best overall outbreak detection performance, having higher sensitivity than the cusum-based Methods and a generally shorter time to detection for larger outbreaks. Overall, the 14-day HMM had a significantly greater area under the receiver operator characteristic curve than the EARS C3 and 7-day negative binomial cusum algorithms. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the HMM provides an effective method for the surveillance of sparse small area notifiable disease data at low false alarm rates. Further investigations are required to evaluation algorithm performance across other diseases and surveillance contexts. BioMed Central 2009-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2735038/ /pubmed/19664256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-39 Text en Copyright ©2009 Watkins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Watkins, Rochelle E
Eagleson, Serryn
Veenendaal, Bert
Wright, Graeme
Plant, Aileen J
Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model
title Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model
title_full Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model
title_fullStr Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model
title_full_unstemmed Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model
title_short Disease surveillance using a hidden Markov model
title_sort disease surveillance using a hidden markov model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-39
work_keys_str_mv AT watkinsrochellee diseasesurveillanceusingahiddenmarkovmodel
AT eaglesonserryn diseasesurveillanceusingahiddenmarkovmodel
AT veenendaalbert diseasesurveillanceusingahiddenmarkovmodel
AT wrightgraeme diseasesurveillanceusingahiddenmarkovmodel
AT plantaileenj diseasesurveillanceusingahiddenmarkovmodel