Cargando…

What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)

BACKGROUND: The declining cost of DNA sequencing is making genome sequencing a feasible option for more organisms, including many of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists. While obtaining high-depth, completely assembled genome sequences for most non-model organisms remains challenging,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, David A, Noor, Mohamed AF
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19689807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-382
_version_ 1782171279484256256
author Rasmussen, David A
Noor, Mohamed AF
author_facet Rasmussen, David A
Noor, Mohamed AF
author_sort Rasmussen, David A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The declining cost of DNA sequencing is making genome sequencing a feasible option for more organisms, including many of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists. While obtaining high-depth, completely assembled genome sequences for most non-model organisms remains challenging, low-coverage genome survey sequences (GSS) can provide a wealth of biologically useful information at low cost. Here, using a random pyrosequencing approach, we sequence the genome of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris and evaluate the utility of our low-coverage GSS approach. RESULTS: Random pyrosequencing of the M. scalaris genome provided a depth of coverage (0.05-0.1x) much lower than typical GSS studies. We demonstrate that, even with extremely low-coverage sequencing, bioinformatics approaches can yield extensive information about functional and repetitive elements. We also use our GSS data to develop genomic resources such as a nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequence and microsatellite markers for M. scalaris. CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-coverage genome surveys are effective at generating useful information about organisms currently lacking genomic sequence data.
format Text
id pubmed-2735751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27357512009-09-01 What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) Rasmussen, David A Noor, Mohamed AF BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The declining cost of DNA sequencing is making genome sequencing a feasible option for more organisms, including many of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists. While obtaining high-depth, completely assembled genome sequences for most non-model organisms remains challenging, low-coverage genome survey sequences (GSS) can provide a wealth of biologically useful information at low cost. Here, using a random pyrosequencing approach, we sequence the genome of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris and evaluate the utility of our low-coverage GSS approach. RESULTS: Random pyrosequencing of the M. scalaris genome provided a depth of coverage (0.05-0.1x) much lower than typical GSS studies. We demonstrate that, even with extremely low-coverage sequencing, bioinformatics approaches can yield extensive information about functional and repetitive elements. We also use our GSS data to develop genomic resources such as a nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequence and microsatellite markers for M. scalaris. CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-coverage genome surveys are effective at generating useful information about organisms currently lacking genomic sequence data. BioMed Central 2009-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2735751/ /pubmed/19689807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-382 Text en Copyright ©2009 Rasmussen and Noor; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rasmussen, David A
Noor, Mohamed AF
What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
title What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
title_full What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
title_fullStr What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
title_full_unstemmed What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
title_short What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
title_sort what can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? a case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly megaselia scalaris (phoridae)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19689807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-382
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussendavida whatcanyoudowith01genomecoverageacasestudybasedonagenomesurveyofthescuttleflymegaseliascalarisphoridae
AT noormohamedaf whatcanyoudowith01genomecoverageacasestudybasedonagenomesurveyofthescuttleflymegaseliascalarisphoridae