Cargando…
What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)
BACKGROUND: The declining cost of DNA sequencing is making genome sequencing a feasible option for more organisms, including many of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists. While obtaining high-depth, completely assembled genome sequences for most non-model organisms remains challenging,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19689807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-382 |
_version_ | 1782171279484256256 |
---|---|
author | Rasmussen, David A Noor, Mohamed AF |
author_facet | Rasmussen, David A Noor, Mohamed AF |
author_sort | Rasmussen, David A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The declining cost of DNA sequencing is making genome sequencing a feasible option for more organisms, including many of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists. While obtaining high-depth, completely assembled genome sequences for most non-model organisms remains challenging, low-coverage genome survey sequences (GSS) can provide a wealth of biologically useful information at low cost. Here, using a random pyrosequencing approach, we sequence the genome of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris and evaluate the utility of our low-coverage GSS approach. RESULTS: Random pyrosequencing of the M. scalaris genome provided a depth of coverage (0.05-0.1x) much lower than typical GSS studies. We demonstrate that, even with extremely low-coverage sequencing, bioinformatics approaches can yield extensive information about functional and repetitive elements. We also use our GSS data to develop genomic resources such as a nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequence and microsatellite markers for M. scalaris. CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-coverage genome surveys are effective at generating useful information about organisms currently lacking genomic sequence data. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2735751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27357512009-09-01 What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) Rasmussen, David A Noor, Mohamed AF BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The declining cost of DNA sequencing is making genome sequencing a feasible option for more organisms, including many of interest to ecologists and evolutionary biologists. While obtaining high-depth, completely assembled genome sequences for most non-model organisms remains challenging, low-coverage genome survey sequences (GSS) can provide a wealth of biologically useful information at low cost. Here, using a random pyrosequencing approach, we sequence the genome of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris and evaluate the utility of our low-coverage GSS approach. RESULTS: Random pyrosequencing of the M. scalaris genome provided a depth of coverage (0.05-0.1x) much lower than typical GSS studies. We demonstrate that, even with extremely low-coverage sequencing, bioinformatics approaches can yield extensive information about functional and repetitive elements. We also use our GSS data to develop genomic resources such as a nearly complete mitochondrial genome sequence and microsatellite markers for M. scalaris. CONCLUSION: We conclude that low-coverage genome surveys are effective at generating useful information about organisms currently lacking genomic sequence data. BioMed Central 2009-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2735751/ /pubmed/19689807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-382 Text en Copyright ©2009 Rasmussen and Noor; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rasmussen, David A Noor, Mohamed AF What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) |
title | What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) |
title_full | What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) |
title_fullStr | What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) |
title_full_unstemmed | What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) |
title_short | What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae) |
title_sort | what can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? a case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly megaselia scalaris (phoridae) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19689807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasmussendavida whatcanyoudowith01genomecoverageacasestudybasedonagenomesurveyofthescuttleflymegaseliascalarisphoridae AT noormohamedaf whatcanyoudowith01genomecoverageacasestudybasedonagenomesurveyofthescuttleflymegaseliascalarisphoridae |