Cargando…

Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets

The detection of differentially expressed genes from EST data is of importance for the discovery of potential biological or pharmaceutical targets, especially when studying biological processes in less characterized organisms and where large-scale microarrays are not an option. We present a comparis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindlöf, Angelica, Bräutigam, Marcus, Chawade, Aakash, Olsson, Olof, Olsson, Björn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19812778
_version_ 1782171283743571968
author Lindlöf, Angelica
Bräutigam, Marcus
Chawade, Aakash
Olsson, Olof
Olsson, Björn
author_facet Lindlöf, Angelica
Bräutigam, Marcus
Chawade, Aakash
Olsson, Olof
Olsson, Björn
author_sort Lindlöf, Angelica
collection PubMed
description The detection of differentially expressed genes from EST data is of importance for the discovery of potential biological or pharmaceutical targets, especially when studying biological processes in less characterized organisms and where large-scale microarrays are not an option. We present a comparison of five different statistical methods for identifying up-regulated genes through pairwise comparison of EST sets, where one of the sets is generated from a treatment and the other one serves as a control. In addition, we specifically address situations where the sets are relatively small (~2,000–10,000 ESTs) and may differ in size. The methods were tested on both simulated and experimentally derived data, and compared to a collection of cold stress induced genes identified by microarrays. We found that combining the method proposed by Audic and Claverie with Fisher’s exact test and a method based on calculating the difference in relative frequency was the best combination for maximizing the detection of up-regulated genes. We also introduced the use of a flexible cutoff, which takes the size of the EST sets into consideration. This could be considered as an alternative to a static cutoff. Finally, the detected genes showed a low overlap with those identified by microarrays, which indicates, as in previous studies, low overall concordance between the two platforms.
format Text
id pubmed-2735943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27359432009-09-14 Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets Lindlöf, Angelica Bräutigam, Marcus Chawade, Aakash Olsson, Olof Olsson, Björn Bioinform Biol Insights Review The detection of differentially expressed genes from EST data is of importance for the discovery of potential biological or pharmaceutical targets, especially when studying biological processes in less characterized organisms and where large-scale microarrays are not an option. We present a comparison of five different statistical methods for identifying up-regulated genes through pairwise comparison of EST sets, where one of the sets is generated from a treatment and the other one serves as a control. In addition, we specifically address situations where the sets are relatively small (~2,000–10,000 ESTs) and may differ in size. The methods were tested on both simulated and experimentally derived data, and compared to a collection of cold stress induced genes identified by microarrays. We found that combining the method proposed by Audic and Claverie with Fisher’s exact test and a method based on calculating the difference in relative frequency was the best combination for maximizing the detection of up-regulated genes. We also introduced the use of a flexible cutoff, which takes the size of the EST sets into consideration. This could be considered as an alternative to a static cutoff. Finally, the detected genes showed a low overlap with those identified by microarrays, which indicates, as in previous studies, low overall concordance between the two platforms. Libertas Academica 2008-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2735943/ /pubmed/19812778 Text en Copyright © 2008 The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lindlöf, Angelica
Bräutigam, Marcus
Chawade, Aakash
Olsson, Olof
Olsson, Björn
Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets
title Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets
title_full Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets
title_fullStr Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets
title_short Evaluation of Combining Several Statistical Methods with a Flexible Cutoff for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes in Pairwise Comparison of EST Sets
title_sort evaluation of combining several statistical methods with a flexible cutoff for identifying differentially expressed genes in pairwise comparison of est sets
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19812778
work_keys_str_mv AT lindlofangelica evaluationofcombiningseveralstatisticalmethodswithaflexiblecutoffforidentifyingdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinpairwisecomparisonofestsets
AT brautigammarcus evaluationofcombiningseveralstatisticalmethodswithaflexiblecutoffforidentifyingdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinpairwisecomparisonofestsets
AT chawadeaakash evaluationofcombiningseveralstatisticalmethodswithaflexiblecutoffforidentifyingdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinpairwisecomparisonofestsets
AT olssonolof evaluationofcombiningseveralstatisticalmethodswithaflexiblecutoffforidentifyingdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinpairwisecomparisonofestsets
AT olssonbjorn evaluationofcombiningseveralstatisticalmethodswithaflexiblecutoffforidentifyingdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinpairwisecomparisonofestsets