Cargando…
Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605211 |
_version_ | 1782171361788035072 |
---|---|
author | Valle, J W Wasan, H Johnson, P Jones, E Dixon, L Swindell, R Baka, S Maraveyas, A Corrie, P Falk, S Gollins, S Lofts, F Evans, L Meyer, T Anthoney, A Iveson, T Highley, M Osborne, R Bridgewater, J |
author_facet | Valle, J W Wasan, H Johnson, P Jones, E Dixon, L Swindell, R Baka, S Maraveyas, A Corrie, P Falk, S Gollins, S Lofts, F Evans, L Meyer, T Anthoney, A Iveson, T Highley, M Osborne, R Bridgewater, J |
author_sort | Valle, J W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsky performance (KP) ⩾60, and adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function were randomised to G 1000 mg m(−2) on D1, 8, 15 q28d (Arm A) or C 25 mg m(−2) followed by G 1000 mg m(−2) D1, 8 q21d (Arm B) for up to 6 months or disease progression. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients (A/B, n=44/42) were randomised between February 2002 and May 2004. Median age (64/62.5 years), KP, primary tumour site, earlier surgery, indwelling biliary stent and disease stage (LA: 25/38%) are comparable between treatment arms. Grade 3–4 toxicity included (A/B, % patients) anaemia (4.5/2.4), leukopenia (6.8/4.8), neutropenia (13.6/14.3), thrombocytopenia (9.1/11.9), lethargy (9.1/28.6), nausea/vomiting (0/7.1) and anorexia (2.3/4.8). Responses (WHO criteria, % of evaluable patients: A n=31 vs B n=36): no CRs; PR 22.6 vs 27.8%; SD 35.5 vs 47.1% for a tumour control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 58.0 vs 75.0%. The median TTP and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary end point) were greater in the C/G arm (4.0 vs 8.0 months and 45.5 vs 57.1% in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both regimens seem active in ABC. C/G is associated with an improved tumour control rate, TTP and 6-month PFS. The study has been extended (ABC-02 study) and powered to determine the effect on overall survival and the quality of life. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2736816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27368162010-08-18 Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study Valle, J W Wasan, H Johnson, P Jones, E Dixon, L Swindell, R Baka, S Maraveyas, A Corrie, P Falk, S Gollins, S Lofts, F Evans, L Meyer, T Anthoney, A Iveson, T Highley, M Osborne, R Bridgewater, J Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsky performance (KP) ⩾60, and adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function were randomised to G 1000 mg m(−2) on D1, 8, 15 q28d (Arm A) or C 25 mg m(−2) followed by G 1000 mg m(−2) D1, 8 q21d (Arm B) for up to 6 months or disease progression. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients (A/B, n=44/42) were randomised between February 2002 and May 2004. Median age (64/62.5 years), KP, primary tumour site, earlier surgery, indwelling biliary stent and disease stage (LA: 25/38%) are comparable between treatment arms. Grade 3–4 toxicity included (A/B, % patients) anaemia (4.5/2.4), leukopenia (6.8/4.8), neutropenia (13.6/14.3), thrombocytopenia (9.1/11.9), lethargy (9.1/28.6), nausea/vomiting (0/7.1) and anorexia (2.3/4.8). Responses (WHO criteria, % of evaluable patients: A n=31 vs B n=36): no CRs; PR 22.6 vs 27.8%; SD 35.5 vs 47.1% for a tumour control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 58.0 vs 75.0%. The median TTP and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary end point) were greater in the C/G arm (4.0 vs 8.0 months and 45.5 vs 57.1% in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both regimens seem active in ABC. C/G is associated with an improved tumour control rate, TTP and 6-month PFS. The study has been extended (ABC-02 study) and powered to determine the effect on overall survival and the quality of life. Nature Publishing Group 2009-08-18 2009-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2736816/ /pubmed/19672264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605211 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Valle, J W Wasan, H Johnson, P Jones, E Dixon, L Swindell, R Baka, S Maraveyas, A Corrie, P Falk, S Gollins, S Lofts, F Evans, L Meyer, T Anthoney, A Iveson, T Highley, M Osborne, R Bridgewater, J Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study |
title | Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study |
title_full | Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study |
title_fullStr | Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study |
title_short | Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study |
title_sort | gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase ii study – the uk abc-01 study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vallejw gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT wasanh gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT johnsonp gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT jonese gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT dixonl gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT swindellr gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT bakas gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT maraveyasa gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT corriep gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT falks gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT gollinss gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT loftsf gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT evansl gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT meyert gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT anthoneya gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT ivesont gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT highleym gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT osborner gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study AT bridgewaterj gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study |