Cargando…

Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study

BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valle, J W, Wasan, H, Johnson, P, Jones, E, Dixon, L, Swindell, R, Baka, S, Maraveyas, A, Corrie, P, Falk, S, Gollins, S, Lofts, F, Evans, L, Meyer, T, Anthoney, A, Iveson, T, Highley, M, Osborne, R, Bridgewater, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605211
_version_ 1782171361788035072
author Valle, J W
Wasan, H
Johnson, P
Jones, E
Dixon, L
Swindell, R
Baka, S
Maraveyas, A
Corrie, P
Falk, S
Gollins, S
Lofts, F
Evans, L
Meyer, T
Anthoney, A
Iveson, T
Highley, M
Osborne, R
Bridgewater, J
author_facet Valle, J W
Wasan, H
Johnson, P
Jones, E
Dixon, L
Swindell, R
Baka, S
Maraveyas, A
Corrie, P
Falk, S
Gollins, S
Lofts, F
Evans, L
Meyer, T
Anthoney, A
Iveson, T
Highley, M
Osborne, R
Bridgewater, J
author_sort Valle, J W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsky performance (KP) ⩾60, and adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function were randomised to G 1000 mg m(−2) on D1, 8, 15 q28d (Arm A) or C 25 mg m(−2) followed by G 1000 mg m(−2) D1, 8 q21d (Arm B) for up to 6 months or disease progression. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients (A/B, n=44/42) were randomised between February 2002 and May 2004. Median age (64/62.5 years), KP, primary tumour site, earlier surgery, indwelling biliary stent and disease stage (LA: 25/38%) are comparable between treatment arms. Grade 3–4 toxicity included (A/B, % patients) anaemia (4.5/2.4), leukopenia (6.8/4.8), neutropenia (13.6/14.3), thrombocytopenia (9.1/11.9), lethargy (9.1/28.6), nausea/vomiting (0/7.1) and anorexia (2.3/4.8). Responses (WHO criteria, % of evaluable patients: A n=31 vs B n=36): no CRs; PR 22.6 vs 27.8%; SD 35.5 vs 47.1% for a tumour control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 58.0 vs 75.0%. The median TTP and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary end point) were greater in the C/G arm (4.0 vs 8.0 months and 45.5 vs 57.1% in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both regimens seem active in ABC. C/G is associated with an improved tumour control rate, TTP and 6-month PFS. The study has been extended (ABC-02 study) and powered to determine the effect on overall survival and the quality of life.
format Text
id pubmed-2736816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27368162010-08-18 Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study Valle, J W Wasan, H Johnson, P Jones, E Dixon, L Swindell, R Baka, S Maraveyas, A Corrie, P Falk, S Gollins, S Lofts, F Evans, L Meyer, T Anthoney, A Iveson, T Highley, M Osborne, R Bridgewater, J Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsky performance (KP) ⩾60, and adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function were randomised to G 1000 mg m(−2) on D1, 8, 15 q28d (Arm A) or C 25 mg m(−2) followed by G 1000 mg m(−2) D1, 8 q21d (Arm B) for up to 6 months or disease progression. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients (A/B, n=44/42) were randomised between February 2002 and May 2004. Median age (64/62.5 years), KP, primary tumour site, earlier surgery, indwelling biliary stent and disease stage (LA: 25/38%) are comparable between treatment arms. Grade 3–4 toxicity included (A/B, % patients) anaemia (4.5/2.4), leukopenia (6.8/4.8), neutropenia (13.6/14.3), thrombocytopenia (9.1/11.9), lethargy (9.1/28.6), nausea/vomiting (0/7.1) and anorexia (2.3/4.8). Responses (WHO criteria, % of evaluable patients: A n=31 vs B n=36): no CRs; PR 22.6 vs 27.8%; SD 35.5 vs 47.1% for a tumour control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 58.0 vs 75.0%. The median TTP and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary end point) were greater in the C/G arm (4.0 vs 8.0 months and 45.5 vs 57.1% in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both regimens seem active in ABC. C/G is associated with an improved tumour control rate, TTP and 6-month PFS. The study has been extended (ABC-02 study) and powered to determine the effect on overall survival and the quality of life. Nature Publishing Group 2009-08-18 2009-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2736816/ /pubmed/19672264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605211 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Valle, J W
Wasan, H
Johnson, P
Jones, E
Dixon, L
Swindell, R
Baka, S
Maraveyas, A
Corrie, P
Falk, S
Gollins, S
Lofts, F
Evans, L
Meyer, T
Anthoney, A
Iveson, T
Highley, M
Osborne, R
Bridgewater, J
Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
title Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
title_full Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
title_fullStr Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
title_short Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study – The UK ABC-01 Study
title_sort gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase ii study – the uk abc-01 study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605211
work_keys_str_mv AT vallejw gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT wasanh gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT johnsonp gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT jonese gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT dixonl gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT swindellr gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT bakas gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT maraveyasa gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT corriep gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT falks gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT gollinss gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT loftsf gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT evansl gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT meyert gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT anthoneya gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT ivesont gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT highleym gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT osborner gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study
AT bridgewaterj gemcitabinealoneorincombinationwithcisplatininpatientswithadvancedormetastaticcholangiocarcinomasorotherbiliarytracttumoursamulticentrerandomisedphaseiistudytheukabc01study