Cargando…

Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial

Objective To determine whether ascertainment of childhood obesity by surveillance followed by structured secondary prevention in primary care improved outcomes in overweight or mildly obese children. Design Randomised controlled trial nested within a baseline cross sectional survey of body mass inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wake, Melissa, Baur, Louise A, Gerner, Bibi, Gibbons, Kay, Gold, Lisa, Gunn, Jane, Levickis, Penny, McCallum, Zoë, Naughton, Geraldine, Sanci, Lena, Ukoumunne, Obioha C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2737607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19729418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3308
_version_ 1782171450264780800
author Wake, Melissa
Baur, Louise A
Gerner, Bibi
Gibbons, Kay
Gold, Lisa
Gunn, Jane
Levickis, Penny
McCallum, Zoë
Naughton, Geraldine
Sanci, Lena
Ukoumunne, Obioha C
author_facet Wake, Melissa
Baur, Louise A
Gerner, Bibi
Gibbons, Kay
Gold, Lisa
Gunn, Jane
Levickis, Penny
McCallum, Zoë
Naughton, Geraldine
Sanci, Lena
Ukoumunne, Obioha C
author_sort Wake, Melissa
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether ascertainment of childhood obesity by surveillance followed by structured secondary prevention in primary care improved outcomes in overweight or mildly obese children. Design Randomised controlled trial nested within a baseline cross sectional survey of body mass index (BMI). Randomisation and outcomes measurement, but not participants, were blinded to group assignment. Setting 45 family practices (66 general practitioners) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 3958 children visiting their general practitioner in May 2005-July 2006 were surveyed for BMI. Of these, 258 children aged 5 years 0 months up to their 10th birthday who were overweight or obese by International Obesity Taskforce criteria were randomised to intervention (n=139) or control (n=119) groups. Children who were very obese (UK BMI z score ≥3.0) were excluded. Intervention Four standard consultations over 12 weeks targeting change in nutrition, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour, supported by purpose designed family materials. Main outcomes measures Primary measure was BMI at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Secondary measures were mean activity count/min by 7-day accelerometry, nutrition score from 4-day abbreviated food frequency diary, and child health related quality of life. Differences were adjusted for socioeconomic status, age, sex, and baseline BMI. Results Of 781 eligible children, 258 (33%) entered the trial; attrition was 3.1% at 6 months and 6.2% at 12 months. Adjusted mean differences (intervention − control) at 6 and 12 months were, for BMI, −0.12 (95% CI −0.40 to 0.15, P=0.4) and −0.11 (−0.45 to 0.22, P=0.5); for physical activity in counts/min, 24 (−4 to 52, P=0.09) and 11 (−26 to 49, P=0.6); and, for nutrition score, 0.2 (−0.03 to 0.4, P=0.1) and 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.4, P=0.2). There was no evidence of harm to the child. Costs to the healthcare system were significantly higher in the intervention arm. Conclusions Primary care screening followed by brief counselling did not improve BMI, physical activity, or nutrition in overweight or mildly obese 5-10 year olds, and it would be very costly if universally implemented. These findings are at odds with national policies in countries including the US, UK, and Australia. Trial registration ISRCTN 52511065 (www.isrctn.org)
format Text
id pubmed-2737607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27376072009-09-04 Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial Wake, Melissa Baur, Louise A Gerner, Bibi Gibbons, Kay Gold, Lisa Gunn, Jane Levickis, Penny McCallum, Zoë Naughton, Geraldine Sanci, Lena Ukoumunne, Obioha C BMJ Research Objective To determine whether ascertainment of childhood obesity by surveillance followed by structured secondary prevention in primary care improved outcomes in overweight or mildly obese children. Design Randomised controlled trial nested within a baseline cross sectional survey of body mass index (BMI). Randomisation and outcomes measurement, but not participants, were blinded to group assignment. Setting 45 family practices (66 general practitioners) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 3958 children visiting their general practitioner in May 2005-July 2006 were surveyed for BMI. Of these, 258 children aged 5 years 0 months up to their 10th birthday who were overweight or obese by International Obesity Taskforce criteria were randomised to intervention (n=139) or control (n=119) groups. Children who were very obese (UK BMI z score ≥3.0) were excluded. Intervention Four standard consultations over 12 weeks targeting change in nutrition, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour, supported by purpose designed family materials. Main outcomes measures Primary measure was BMI at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Secondary measures were mean activity count/min by 7-day accelerometry, nutrition score from 4-day abbreviated food frequency diary, and child health related quality of life. Differences were adjusted for socioeconomic status, age, sex, and baseline BMI. Results Of 781 eligible children, 258 (33%) entered the trial; attrition was 3.1% at 6 months and 6.2% at 12 months. Adjusted mean differences (intervention − control) at 6 and 12 months were, for BMI, −0.12 (95% CI −0.40 to 0.15, P=0.4) and −0.11 (−0.45 to 0.22, P=0.5); for physical activity in counts/min, 24 (−4 to 52, P=0.09) and 11 (−26 to 49, P=0.6); and, for nutrition score, 0.2 (−0.03 to 0.4, P=0.1) and 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.4, P=0.2). There was no evidence of harm to the child. Costs to the healthcare system were significantly higher in the intervention arm. Conclusions Primary care screening followed by brief counselling did not improve BMI, physical activity, or nutrition in overweight or mildly obese 5-10 year olds, and it would be very costly if universally implemented. These findings are at odds with national policies in countries including the US, UK, and Australia. Trial registration ISRCTN 52511065 (www.isrctn.org) BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2737607/ /pubmed/19729418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3308 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Wake, Melissa
Baur, Louise A
Gerner, Bibi
Gibbons, Kay
Gold, Lisa
Gunn, Jane
Levickis, Penny
McCallum, Zoë
Naughton, Geraldine
Sanci, Lena
Ukoumunne, Obioha C
Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial
title Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial
title_full Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial
title_short Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial
title_sort outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the leap 2 randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2737607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19729418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3308
work_keys_str_mv AT wakemelissa outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT baurlouisea outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gernerbibi outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gibbonskay outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goldlisa outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gunnjane outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT levickispenny outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccallumzoe outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT naughtongeraldine outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sancilena outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ukoumunneobiohac outcomesandcostsofprimarycaresurveillanceandinterventionforoverweightorobesechildrentheleap2randomisedcontrolledtrial