Cargando…

Xenograft models of head and neck cancers

Head and neck cancers are among the most prevalent tumors in the world. Despite advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors, the survival of patients with these cancers has not markedly improved over the past several decades because of our inability to control and our poor understanding of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sano, Daisuke, Myers, Jeffrey N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2737672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19678942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-1-32
_version_ 1782171458991030272
author Sano, Daisuke
Myers, Jeffrey N
author_facet Sano, Daisuke
Myers, Jeffrey N
author_sort Sano, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description Head and neck cancers are among the most prevalent tumors in the world. Despite advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors, the survival of patients with these cancers has not markedly improved over the past several decades because of our inability to control and our poor understanding of the regional and distant spread of this disease. One of the factors contributing to our poor understanding may be the lack of reliable animal models of head and neck cancer metastasis. The earliest xenograft models in which human tumor cells were grown in immunosuppressed mice involved subcutaneous implantation of human head and neck cancer cell lines. Subcutaneous xenograft models have been popular because they are easy to establish, easy to manage, and lend themselves to ready quantitation of the tumor burden. More recently, orthotopic xenograft models, in which the tumor cells are implanted in the tumor site of origin, have been used with greater frequency in animal studies of head and neck cancers. Orthotopic xenograft models are advantageous for their ability to mimic local tumor growth and recapitulate the pathways of metastasis seen in human head and neck cancers. In addition, recent innovations in cell labeling techniques and small-animal imaging have enabled investigators to monitor the metastatic process and quantitate the growth and spread of orthopically implanted tumors. This review summarizes the progress in the development of murine xenograft models of head and neck cancers. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of xenograft model. We also discuss the potential for these models to help elucidate the mechanisms of regional and distant metastasis, which could improve our ability to treat head and neck cancers.
format Text
id pubmed-2737672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27376722009-09-04 Xenograft models of head and neck cancers Sano, Daisuke Myers, Jeffrey N Head Neck Oncol Review Head and neck cancers are among the most prevalent tumors in the world. Despite advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors, the survival of patients with these cancers has not markedly improved over the past several decades because of our inability to control and our poor understanding of the regional and distant spread of this disease. One of the factors contributing to our poor understanding may be the lack of reliable animal models of head and neck cancer metastasis. The earliest xenograft models in which human tumor cells were grown in immunosuppressed mice involved subcutaneous implantation of human head and neck cancer cell lines. Subcutaneous xenograft models have been popular because they are easy to establish, easy to manage, and lend themselves to ready quantitation of the tumor burden. More recently, orthotopic xenograft models, in which the tumor cells are implanted in the tumor site of origin, have been used with greater frequency in animal studies of head and neck cancers. Orthotopic xenograft models are advantageous for their ability to mimic local tumor growth and recapitulate the pathways of metastasis seen in human head and neck cancers. In addition, recent innovations in cell labeling techniques and small-animal imaging have enabled investigators to monitor the metastatic process and quantitate the growth and spread of orthopically implanted tumors. This review summarizes the progress in the development of murine xenograft models of head and neck cancers. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of xenograft model. We also discuss the potential for these models to help elucidate the mechanisms of regional and distant metastasis, which could improve our ability to treat head and neck cancers. BioMed Central 2009-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2737672/ /pubmed/19678942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-1-32 Text en Copyright © 2009 Sano and Myers; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Sano, Daisuke
Myers, Jeffrey N
Xenograft models of head and neck cancers
title Xenograft models of head and neck cancers
title_full Xenograft models of head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Xenograft models of head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Xenograft models of head and neck cancers
title_short Xenograft models of head and neck cancers
title_sort xenograft models of head and neck cancers
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2737672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19678942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-1-32
work_keys_str_mv AT sanodaisuke xenograftmodelsofheadandneckcancers
AT myersjeffreyn xenograftmodelsofheadandneckcancers