Cargando…

Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report

INTRODUCTION: Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome is an unusual complication of pacemaker implantation. Endothelial damage caused by repeated trauma from the lead is thought to be responsible for the stenosis. Malignancy has been historically the most common etiology. However, the increase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senthilvel, Egambaram, Papadakis, Aphrodite, Jain, Vikas, Bruner, Julia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cases Network Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19829810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-6463
_version_ 1782171681608957952
author Senthilvel, Egambaram
Papadakis, Aphrodite
Jain, Vikas
Bruner, Julia
author_facet Senthilvel, Egambaram
Papadakis, Aphrodite
Jain, Vikas
Bruner, Julia
author_sort Senthilvel, Egambaram
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome is an unusual complication of pacemaker implantation. Endothelial damage caused by repeated trauma from the lead is thought to be responsible for the stenosis. Malignancy has been historically the most common etiology. However, the increase in use of indwelling venous catheters and cardiac pacemaker has resulted in more patients with superior vena cava syndrome of benign etiology. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old female presented with recurrent spasm and swelling of the neck for the duration of two months. Pacemaker was implanted in 1997 for symptomatic third degree heart block. It was removed in 2007 due to recurrent infection at the lead site. Computed tomography of the chest and venogram were performed which showed stenosis at origin of the superior vena cava with some collateral circulation. She underwent angioplasty by the interventional radiology and is currently free of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlights a relatively uncommon complication of pacemaker. As a primary care physician, one should be aware of this unusual complication of pacemaker. Superior vena cava syndrome should be suspected in patients with history of pacemaker insertion who present to the primary care physician with neck spasm or neck swelling. Primary care physicians should also be aware balloon angioplasty is a reasonable primary intervention in selected patient population.
format Text
id pubmed-2740218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Cases Network Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27402182009-10-14 Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report Senthilvel, Egambaram Papadakis, Aphrodite Jain, Vikas Bruner, Julia Cases J Case report INTRODUCTION: Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome is an unusual complication of pacemaker implantation. Endothelial damage caused by repeated trauma from the lead is thought to be responsible for the stenosis. Malignancy has been historically the most common etiology. However, the increase in use of indwelling venous catheters and cardiac pacemaker has resulted in more patients with superior vena cava syndrome of benign etiology. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old female presented with recurrent spasm and swelling of the neck for the duration of two months. Pacemaker was implanted in 1997 for symptomatic third degree heart block. It was removed in 2007 due to recurrent infection at the lead site. Computed tomography of the chest and venogram were performed which showed stenosis at origin of the superior vena cava with some collateral circulation. She underwent angioplasty by the interventional radiology and is currently free of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlights a relatively uncommon complication of pacemaker. As a primary care physician, one should be aware of this unusual complication of pacemaker. Superior vena cava syndrome should be suspected in patients with history of pacemaker insertion who present to the primary care physician with neck spasm or neck swelling. Primary care physicians should also be aware balloon angioplasty is a reasonable primary intervention in selected patient population. Cases Network Ltd 2009-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2740218/ /pubmed/19829810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-6463 Text en © 2009 Senthilvel et al.; licensee Cases Network Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case report
Senthilvel, Egambaram
Papadakis, Aphrodite
Jain, Vikas
Bruner, Julia
Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
title Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
title_full Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
title_fullStr Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
title_short Pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
title_sort pacemaker induced superior vena cava syndrome: a case report
topic Case report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19829810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-6463
work_keys_str_mv AT senthilvelegambaram pacemakerinducedsuperiorvenacavasyndromeacasereport
AT papadakisaphrodite pacemakerinducedsuperiorvenacavasyndromeacasereport
AT jainvikas pacemakerinducedsuperiorvenacavasyndromeacasereport
AT brunerjulia pacemakerinducedsuperiorvenacavasyndromeacasereport