Cargando…

Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) lung densitometry has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive and specific outcome measure for the assessment of emphysema-modifying therapy, but the optimum densitometric index has yet to be determined and targeted sampling may be more sensitive than whole lu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parr, David G, Dirksen, Asger, Piitulainen, Eeva, Deng, Chunqin, Wencker, Marion, Stockley, Robert A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19678952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-75
_version_ 1782171755104698368
author Parr, David G
Dirksen, Asger
Piitulainen, Eeva
Deng, Chunqin
Wencker, Marion
Stockley, Robert A
author_facet Parr, David G
Dirksen, Asger
Piitulainen, Eeva
Deng, Chunqin
Wencker, Marion
Stockley, Robert A
author_sort Parr, David G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) lung densitometry has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive and specific outcome measure for the assessment of emphysema-modifying therapy, but the optimum densitometric index has yet to be determined and targeted sampling may be more sensitive than whole lung assessment. The EXAcerbations and CT scan as Lung Endpoints (EXACTLE) trial aimed to clarify the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry data for the assessment of alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) augmentation therapy on the progression of emphysema in AAT deficiency (AATD). METHODS: Patients with AATD (n = 77) were randomised to weekly infusions of 60 mg/kg human AAT (Prolastin(®)) or placebo over 2 to 2.5 years. Lung volume was included as a covariate in an endpoint analysis and a comparison was made of different CT densitometric indices (15th percentile lung density [PD15], mean lung density [MLD] and voxel index at a threshold of -910 [VI-910] and -950 [VI-950] Hounsfield Units) obtained from whole lung scans at baseline and at 24 to 30 months. Targeted regional sampling was compared with whole lung assessment. RESULTS: Whole lung analysis of the total change (baseline to last CT scan) compared with placebo indicated a concordant trend that was suggestive of a treatment effect for all densitometric indices (MLD [1.402 g/L, p = 0.204]; VI-910 [-0.611, p = 0.389]; VI-950 [-0.432, p = 0.452]) and that was significant using PD15 (1.472 g/L, p = 0.049). Assessment of the progression of emphysema in the apical, middle and basal regions of the lung by measurement with PD15 showed that this treatment effect was more evident when the basal third was sampled (1.722 g/L, p = 0.040). A comparison between different densitometric indices indicated that the influence of inspiratory variability between scans was greatest for PD15, but when adjustment for lung volume was made this index was the most sensitive measure of emphysema progression. CONCLUSION: PD15 is the most sensitive index of emphysema progression and of treatment modification. Targeted sampling may be more sensitive than whole lung analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as 'Antitrypsin (AAT) to Treat Emphysema in AAT-Deficient Patients'; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263887.
format Text
id pubmed-2740846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27408462009-09-10 Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency Parr, David G Dirksen, Asger Piitulainen, Eeva Deng, Chunqin Wencker, Marion Stockley, Robert A Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) lung densitometry has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive and specific outcome measure for the assessment of emphysema-modifying therapy, but the optimum densitometric index has yet to be determined and targeted sampling may be more sensitive than whole lung assessment. The EXAcerbations and CT scan as Lung Endpoints (EXACTLE) trial aimed to clarify the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry data for the assessment of alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) augmentation therapy on the progression of emphysema in AAT deficiency (AATD). METHODS: Patients with AATD (n = 77) were randomised to weekly infusions of 60 mg/kg human AAT (Prolastin(®)) or placebo over 2 to 2.5 years. Lung volume was included as a covariate in an endpoint analysis and a comparison was made of different CT densitometric indices (15th percentile lung density [PD15], mean lung density [MLD] and voxel index at a threshold of -910 [VI-910] and -950 [VI-950] Hounsfield Units) obtained from whole lung scans at baseline and at 24 to 30 months. Targeted regional sampling was compared with whole lung assessment. RESULTS: Whole lung analysis of the total change (baseline to last CT scan) compared with placebo indicated a concordant trend that was suggestive of a treatment effect for all densitometric indices (MLD [1.402 g/L, p = 0.204]; VI-910 [-0.611, p = 0.389]; VI-950 [-0.432, p = 0.452]) and that was significant using PD15 (1.472 g/L, p = 0.049). Assessment of the progression of emphysema in the apical, middle and basal regions of the lung by measurement with PD15 showed that this treatment effect was more evident when the basal third was sampled (1.722 g/L, p = 0.040). A comparison between different densitometric indices indicated that the influence of inspiratory variability between scans was greatest for PD15, but when adjustment for lung volume was made this index was the most sensitive measure of emphysema progression. CONCLUSION: PD15 is the most sensitive index of emphysema progression and of treatment modification. Targeted sampling may be more sensitive than whole lung analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as 'Antitrypsin (AAT) to Treat Emphysema in AAT-Deficient Patients'; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263887. BioMed Central 2009 2009-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2740846/ /pubmed/19678952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-75 Text en Copyright © 2009 Parr et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Parr, David G
Dirksen, Asger
Piitulainen, Eeva
Deng, Chunqin
Wencker, Marion
Stockley, Robert A
Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
title Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
title_full Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
title_fullStr Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
title_short Exploring the optimum approach to the use of CT densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
title_sort exploring the optimum approach to the use of ct densitometry in a randomised placebo-controlled study of augmentation therapy in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19678952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-75
work_keys_str_mv AT parrdavidg exploringtheoptimumapproachtotheuseofctdensitometryinarandomisedplacebocontrolledstudyofaugmentationtherapyinalpha1antitrypsindeficiency
AT dirksenasger exploringtheoptimumapproachtotheuseofctdensitometryinarandomisedplacebocontrolledstudyofaugmentationtherapyinalpha1antitrypsindeficiency
AT piitulaineneeva exploringtheoptimumapproachtotheuseofctdensitometryinarandomisedplacebocontrolledstudyofaugmentationtherapyinalpha1antitrypsindeficiency
AT dengchunqin exploringtheoptimumapproachtotheuseofctdensitometryinarandomisedplacebocontrolledstudyofaugmentationtherapyinalpha1antitrypsindeficiency
AT wenckermarion exploringtheoptimumapproachtotheuseofctdensitometryinarandomisedplacebocontrolledstudyofaugmentationtherapyinalpha1antitrypsindeficiency
AT stockleyroberta exploringtheoptimumapproachtotheuseofctdensitometryinarandomisedplacebocontrolledstudyofaugmentationtherapyinalpha1antitrypsindeficiency