Cargando…

An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'

BACKGROUND: Negotiations on a future climate policy framework addressing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are ongoing. Regardless of how such a framework will be designed, many technical solutions of estimating forest cover and forest carbon stock change exist to support p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böttcher, Hannes, Eisbrenner, Katja, Fritz, Steffen, Kindermann, Georg, Kraxner, Florian, McCallum, Ian, Obersteiner, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2741441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19709413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-7
_version_ 1782171787305418752
author Böttcher, Hannes
Eisbrenner, Katja
Fritz, Steffen
Kindermann, Georg
Kraxner, Florian
McCallum, Ian
Obersteiner, Michael
author_facet Böttcher, Hannes
Eisbrenner, Katja
Fritz, Steffen
Kindermann, Georg
Kraxner, Florian
McCallum, Ian
Obersteiner, Michael
author_sort Böttcher, Hannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Negotiations on a future climate policy framework addressing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are ongoing. Regardless of how such a framework will be designed, many technical solutions of estimating forest cover and forest carbon stock change exist to support policy in monitoring and accounting. These technologies typically combine remotely sensed data with ground-based inventories. In this article we assess the costs of monitoring REDD based on available technologies and requirements associated with key elements of REDD policy. RESULTS: We find that the design of a REDD policy framework (and specifically its rules) can have a significant impact on monitoring costs. Costs may vary from 0.5 to 550 US$ per square kilometre depending on the required precision of carbon stock and area change detection. Moreover, they follow economies of scale, i.e. single country or project solutions will face relatively higher monitoring costs. CONCLUSION: Although monitoring costs are relatively small compared to other cost items within a REDD system, they should be shared not only among countries but also among sectors, because an integrated monitoring system would have multiple benefits for non-REDD management. Overcoming initialization costs and unequal access to monitoring technologies is crucial for implementation of an integrated monitoring system, and demands for international cooperation.
format Text
id pubmed-2741441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27414412009-09-11 An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation' Böttcher, Hannes Eisbrenner, Katja Fritz, Steffen Kindermann, Georg Kraxner, Florian McCallum, Ian Obersteiner, Michael Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: Negotiations on a future climate policy framework addressing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are ongoing. Regardless of how such a framework will be designed, many technical solutions of estimating forest cover and forest carbon stock change exist to support policy in monitoring and accounting. These technologies typically combine remotely sensed data with ground-based inventories. In this article we assess the costs of monitoring REDD based on available technologies and requirements associated with key elements of REDD policy. RESULTS: We find that the design of a REDD policy framework (and specifically its rules) can have a significant impact on monitoring costs. Costs may vary from 0.5 to 550 US$ per square kilometre depending on the required precision of carbon stock and area change detection. Moreover, they follow economies of scale, i.e. single country or project solutions will face relatively higher monitoring costs. CONCLUSION: Although monitoring costs are relatively small compared to other cost items within a REDD system, they should be shared not only among countries but also among sectors, because an integrated monitoring system would have multiple benefits for non-REDD management. Overcoming initialization costs and unequal access to monitoring technologies is crucial for implementation of an integrated monitoring system, and demands for international cooperation. BioMed Central 2009-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2741441/ /pubmed/19709413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2009 Böttcher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Böttcher, Hannes
Eisbrenner, Katja
Fritz, Steffen
Kindermann, Georg
Kraxner, Florian
McCallum, Ian
Obersteiner, Michael
An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
title An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
title_full An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
title_fullStr An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
title_short An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
title_sort assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation'
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2741441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19709413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bottcherhannes anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT eisbrennerkatja anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT fritzsteffen anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT kindermanngeorg anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT kraxnerflorian anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT mccallumian anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT obersteinermichael anassessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT bottcherhannes assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT eisbrennerkatja assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT fritzsteffen assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT kindermanngeorg assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT kraxnerflorian assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT mccallumian assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation
AT obersteinermichael assessmentofmonitoringrequirementsandcostsofreducedemissionsfromdeforestationanddegradation