Cargando…
Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) volumes, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and symptoms of patients with heart failure (HF). However, ≥ 30% of patients have no significant clinical or echocardiographic improvement following CRT. Reverse remodeling...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-39 |
_version_ | 1782171908926603264 |
---|---|
author | Magne, Julien Dubois, Michelle Champagne, Jean Dumesnil, Jean G Pibarot, Philippe Philippon, François O'Hara, Gilles Sénéchal, Mario |
author_facet | Magne, Julien Dubois, Michelle Champagne, Jean Dumesnil, Jean G Pibarot, Philippe Philippon, François O'Hara, Gilles Sénéchal, Mario |
author_sort | Magne, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) volumes, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and symptoms of patients with heart failure (HF). However, ≥ 30% of patients have no significant clinical or echocardiographic improvement following CRT. Reverse remodeling after CRT correlates with improved clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that in NT-pro BNP monitoring is accurate to identify responders following CRT. METHODS: 42 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years, male 68%) with HF undergoing CRT were prospectively enrolled. Responders at follow-up were defined by echocardiography (decrease in LV end systolic volume ≥ 15%). Echocardiography and NT-pro BNP measurement were performed at baseline and repeated 3 to 6 month after CRT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between responders (n = 29, 69%) and non-responders (n = 13, 31%) regarding baseline NT-pro BNP level. Responders had significantly higher decrease in NT-pro BNP levels during follow-up than non-responders (absolute: -1428 ± 1333 pg.ml(-1 )vs. -61 ± 959 pg.ml(-1), p = 0.002; relative: -45 ± 28% vs. 2 ± 28%, p < 0.0001). A decrease of ≥ 15% in NT-pro BNP 3–6 months after CRT identifies echocardiographic responders with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 77%. CONCLUSION: NT-pro BNP monitoring can accurately identify echocardiographic responders after CRT. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2744656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27446562009-09-16 Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy Magne, Julien Dubois, Michelle Champagne, Jean Dumesnil, Jean G Pibarot, Philippe Philippon, François O'Hara, Gilles Sénéchal, Mario Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) volumes, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and symptoms of patients with heart failure (HF). However, ≥ 30% of patients have no significant clinical or echocardiographic improvement following CRT. Reverse remodeling after CRT correlates with improved clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that in NT-pro BNP monitoring is accurate to identify responders following CRT. METHODS: 42 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years, male 68%) with HF undergoing CRT were prospectively enrolled. Responders at follow-up were defined by echocardiography (decrease in LV end systolic volume ≥ 15%). Echocardiography and NT-pro BNP measurement were performed at baseline and repeated 3 to 6 month after CRT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between responders (n = 29, 69%) and non-responders (n = 13, 31%) regarding baseline NT-pro BNP level. Responders had significantly higher decrease in NT-pro BNP levels during follow-up than non-responders (absolute: -1428 ± 1333 pg.ml(-1 )vs. -61 ± 959 pg.ml(-1), p = 0.002; relative: -45 ± 28% vs. 2 ± 28%, p < 0.0001). A decrease of ≥ 15% in NT-pro BNP 3–6 months after CRT identifies echocardiographic responders with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 77%. CONCLUSION: NT-pro BNP monitoring can accurately identify echocardiographic responders after CRT. BioMed Central 2009-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2744656/ /pubmed/19695099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-39 Text en Copyright © 2009 Magne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Magne, Julien Dubois, Michelle Champagne, Jean Dumesnil, Jean G Pibarot, Philippe Philippon, François O'Hara, Gilles Sénéchal, Mario Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title | Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full | Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_short | Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_sort | usefulness of nt-pro bnp monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magnejulien usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT duboismichelle usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT champagnejean usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT dumesniljeang usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT pibarotphilippe usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT philipponfrancois usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT oharagilles usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT senechalmario usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy |