Cargando…

Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) volumes, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and symptoms of patients with heart failure (HF). However, ≥ 30% of patients have no significant clinical or echocardiographic improvement following CRT. Reverse remodeling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magne, Julien, Dubois, Michelle, Champagne, Jean, Dumesnil, Jean G, Pibarot, Philippe, Philippon, François, O'Hara, Gilles, Sénéchal, Mario
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-39
_version_ 1782171908926603264
author Magne, Julien
Dubois, Michelle
Champagne, Jean
Dumesnil, Jean G
Pibarot, Philippe
Philippon, François
O'Hara, Gilles
Sénéchal, Mario
author_facet Magne, Julien
Dubois, Michelle
Champagne, Jean
Dumesnil, Jean G
Pibarot, Philippe
Philippon, François
O'Hara, Gilles
Sénéchal, Mario
author_sort Magne, Julien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) volumes, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and symptoms of patients with heart failure (HF). However, ≥ 30% of patients have no significant clinical or echocardiographic improvement following CRT. Reverse remodeling after CRT correlates with improved clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that in NT-pro BNP monitoring is accurate to identify responders following CRT. METHODS: 42 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years, male 68%) with HF undergoing CRT were prospectively enrolled. Responders at follow-up were defined by echocardiography (decrease in LV end systolic volume ≥ 15%). Echocardiography and NT-pro BNP measurement were performed at baseline and repeated 3 to 6 month after CRT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between responders (n = 29, 69%) and non-responders (n = 13, 31%) regarding baseline NT-pro BNP level. Responders had significantly higher decrease in NT-pro BNP levels during follow-up than non-responders (absolute: -1428 ± 1333 pg.ml(-1 )vs. -61 ± 959 pg.ml(-1), p = 0.002; relative: -45 ± 28% vs. 2 ± 28%, p < 0.0001). A decrease of ≥ 15% in NT-pro BNP 3–6 months after CRT identifies echocardiographic responders with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 77%. CONCLUSION: NT-pro BNP monitoring can accurately identify echocardiographic responders after CRT.
format Text
id pubmed-2744656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27446562009-09-16 Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy Magne, Julien Dubois, Michelle Champagne, Jean Dumesnil, Jean G Pibarot, Philippe Philippon, François O'Hara, Gilles Sénéchal, Mario Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) volumes, mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and symptoms of patients with heart failure (HF). However, ≥ 30% of patients have no significant clinical or echocardiographic improvement following CRT. Reverse remodeling after CRT correlates with improved clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that in NT-pro BNP monitoring is accurate to identify responders following CRT. METHODS: 42 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years, male 68%) with HF undergoing CRT were prospectively enrolled. Responders at follow-up were defined by echocardiography (decrease in LV end systolic volume ≥ 15%). Echocardiography and NT-pro BNP measurement were performed at baseline and repeated 3 to 6 month after CRT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between responders (n = 29, 69%) and non-responders (n = 13, 31%) regarding baseline NT-pro BNP level. Responders had significantly higher decrease in NT-pro BNP levels during follow-up than non-responders (absolute: -1428 ± 1333 pg.ml(-1 )vs. -61 ± 959 pg.ml(-1), p = 0.002; relative: -45 ± 28% vs. 2 ± 28%, p < 0.0001). A decrease of ≥ 15% in NT-pro BNP 3–6 months after CRT identifies echocardiographic responders with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 77%. CONCLUSION: NT-pro BNP monitoring can accurately identify echocardiographic responders after CRT. BioMed Central 2009-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2744656/ /pubmed/19695099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-39 Text en Copyright © 2009 Magne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Magne, Julien
Dubois, Michelle
Champagne, Jean
Dumesnil, Jean G
Pibarot, Philippe
Philippon, François
O'Hara, Gilles
Sénéchal, Mario
Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_fullStr Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_short Usefulness of NT-pro BNP monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_sort usefulness of nt-pro bnp monitoring to identify echocardiographic responders following cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19695099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-7-39
work_keys_str_mv AT magnejulien usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT duboismichelle usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT champagnejean usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT dumesniljeang usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT pibarotphilippe usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT philipponfrancois usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT oharagilles usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT senechalmario usefulnessofntprobnpmonitoringtoidentifyechocardiographicrespondersfollowingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy