Cargando…

Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND: The use of electronic health records (EHRs) to support the organization and delivery of healthcare is evolving rapidly. However, little is known regarding potential variation in access to EHRs by provider type or care setting. This paper reports on observed variation in the perceptions o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orchard, Margo C, Dobrow, Mark J, Paszat, Lawrence, Jiang, Hedy, Brown, Patrick
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2746184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-38
_version_ 1782172018795347968
author Orchard, Margo C
Dobrow, Mark J
Paszat, Lawrence
Jiang, Hedy
Brown, Patrick
author_facet Orchard, Margo C
Dobrow, Mark J
Paszat, Lawrence
Jiang, Hedy
Brown, Patrick
author_sort Orchard, Margo C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of electronic health records (EHRs) to support the organization and delivery of healthcare is evolving rapidly. However, little is known regarding potential variation in access to EHRs by provider type or care setting. This paper reports on observed variation in the perceptions of access to EHRs by a wide range of cancer care providers covering diverse cancer care settings in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Perspectives were sought regarding EHR access and health record completeness for cancer patients as part of an internet survey of 5663 cancer care providers and administrators in Ontario. Data were analyzed using a multilevel logistic regression model. Provider type, location of work, and access to computer or internet were included as covariates in the model. RESULTS: A total of 1997 of 5663 (35%) valid responses were collected. Focusing on data from cancer care providers (N = 1247), significant variation in EHR access and health record completeness was observed between provider types, location of work, and level of computer access. Providers who worked in community hospitals were half as likely as those who worked in teaching hospitals to have access to their patients' EHRs (OR 0.45 95% CI: 0.24–0.85, p < 0.05) and were six times less likely to have access to other organizations' EHRs (OR 0.15 95% CI: 0.02–1.00, p < 0.05). Compared to surgeons, nurses (OR 3.47 95% CI: 1.80–6.68, p < 0.05), radiation therapists/physicists (OR 7.86 95% CI: 2.54–25.34, p < 0.05), and other clinicians (OR 4.92 95% CI: 2.15–11.27, p < 0.05) were more likely to report good access to their organization's EHRs. CONCLUSION: Variability in access across different provider groups, organization types, and geographic locations illustrates the fragmented nature of EHR adoption in the cancer system. Along with focusing on technological aspects of EHR adoption within organizations, it is essential that there is cross-organizational and cross-provider access to EHRs to ensure patient continuity of care, system efficiency, and high quality care.
format Text
id pubmed-2746184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27461842009-09-18 Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada Orchard, Margo C Dobrow, Mark J Paszat, Lawrence Jiang, Hedy Brown, Patrick BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of electronic health records (EHRs) to support the organization and delivery of healthcare is evolving rapidly. However, little is known regarding potential variation in access to EHRs by provider type or care setting. This paper reports on observed variation in the perceptions of access to EHRs by a wide range of cancer care providers covering diverse cancer care settings in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Perspectives were sought regarding EHR access and health record completeness for cancer patients as part of an internet survey of 5663 cancer care providers and administrators in Ontario. Data were analyzed using a multilevel logistic regression model. Provider type, location of work, and access to computer or internet were included as covariates in the model. RESULTS: A total of 1997 of 5663 (35%) valid responses were collected. Focusing on data from cancer care providers (N = 1247), significant variation in EHR access and health record completeness was observed between provider types, location of work, and level of computer access. Providers who worked in community hospitals were half as likely as those who worked in teaching hospitals to have access to their patients' EHRs (OR 0.45 95% CI: 0.24–0.85, p < 0.05) and were six times less likely to have access to other organizations' EHRs (OR 0.15 95% CI: 0.02–1.00, p < 0.05). Compared to surgeons, nurses (OR 3.47 95% CI: 1.80–6.68, p < 0.05), radiation therapists/physicists (OR 7.86 95% CI: 2.54–25.34, p < 0.05), and other clinicians (OR 4.92 95% CI: 2.15–11.27, p < 0.05) were more likely to report good access to their organization's EHRs. CONCLUSION: Variability in access across different provider groups, organization types, and geographic locations illustrates the fragmented nature of EHR adoption in the cancer system. Along with focusing on technological aspects of EHR adoption within organizations, it is essential that there is cross-organizational and cross-provider access to EHRs to ensure patient continuity of care, system efficiency, and high quality care. BioMed Central 2009-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2746184/ /pubmed/19664247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-38 Text en Copyright ©2009 Orchard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Orchard, Margo C
Dobrow, Mark J
Paszat, Lawrence
Jiang, Hedy
Brown, Patrick
Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
title Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
title_full Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
title_short Access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in Ontario, Canada
title_sort access to electronic health records by care setting and provider type: perceptions of cancer care providers in ontario, canada
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2746184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-38
work_keys_str_mv AT orchardmargoc accesstoelectronichealthrecordsbycaresettingandprovidertypeperceptionsofcancercareprovidersinontariocanada
AT dobrowmarkj accesstoelectronichealthrecordsbycaresettingandprovidertypeperceptionsofcancercareprovidersinontariocanada
AT paszatlawrence accesstoelectronichealthrecordsbycaresettingandprovidertypeperceptionsofcancercareprovidersinontariocanada
AT jianghedy accesstoelectronichealthrecordsbycaresettingandprovidertypeperceptionsofcancercareprovidersinontariocanada
AT brownpatrick accesstoelectronichealthrecordsbycaresettingandprovidertypeperceptionsofcancercareprovidersinontariocanada