Cargando…
Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension
OBJECTIVE: Megestrol acetate oral suspension (MAOS) is an appetite stimulant indicated for cachexia in patients with AIDS. It is available in its original formulation, Megace(®) (MAOS), and as a nanocrystal dispersion, Megace(®) ES (MA-ES). Three studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokineti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19774117 |
_version_ | 1782172081581981696 |
---|---|
author | Deschamps, Benoit Musaji, Naomi Gillespie, John A |
author_facet | Deschamps, Benoit Musaji, Naomi Gillespie, John A |
author_sort | Deschamps, Benoit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Megestrol acetate oral suspension (MAOS) is an appetite stimulant indicated for cachexia in patients with AIDS. It is available in its original formulation, Megace(®) (MAOS), and as a nanocrystal dispersion, Megace(®) ES (MA-ES). Three studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of these formulations under fed and fasting conditions. METHODS: An open-label, crossover trial was conducted in 24 healthy males randomized to MA-ES 625 mg/5 mL given with a high-calorie, high-fat meal, or after an overnight fast. Blood samples were drawn at multiple time points and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Two separate, open-label reference studies evaluated MAOS 800 mg/20 mL in 40 fed or 40 fasting healthy male volunteers. RESULTS: In fasting MA-ES subjects, the average maximum concentration (C(max)) was 30% less than the fed C(max) value. For MAOS, fasting C(max) was 86% less than fed C(max). In fasting subjects, the area under the curve was 12,095 ng·h/mL for MA-ES, and 8,942 ng·h/mL for MAOS. In fed subjects, the absorption of the two formulations was comparable. CONCLUSION: Bioavailability and absorption are greater for MA-ES than MAOS in fasting subjects. MA-ES may be a preferred formulation of megestrol acetate when managing cachectic patients whose caloric intake is reduced. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2747353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27473532009-09-22 Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension Deschamps, Benoit Musaji, Naomi Gillespie, John A Int J Nanomedicine Original Research OBJECTIVE: Megestrol acetate oral suspension (MAOS) is an appetite stimulant indicated for cachexia in patients with AIDS. It is available in its original formulation, Megace(®) (MAOS), and as a nanocrystal dispersion, Megace(®) ES (MA-ES). Three studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of these formulations under fed and fasting conditions. METHODS: An open-label, crossover trial was conducted in 24 healthy males randomized to MA-ES 625 mg/5 mL given with a high-calorie, high-fat meal, or after an overnight fast. Blood samples were drawn at multiple time points and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Two separate, open-label reference studies evaluated MAOS 800 mg/20 mL in 40 fed or 40 fasting healthy male volunteers. RESULTS: In fasting MA-ES subjects, the average maximum concentration (C(max)) was 30% less than the fed C(max) value. For MAOS, fasting C(max) was 86% less than fed C(max). In fasting subjects, the area under the curve was 12,095 ng·h/mL for MA-ES, and 8,942 ng·h/mL for MAOS. In fed subjects, the absorption of the two formulations was comparable. CONCLUSION: Bioavailability and absorption are greater for MA-ES than MAOS in fasting subjects. MA-ES may be a preferred formulation of megestrol acetate when managing cachectic patients whose caloric intake is reduced. Dove Medical Press 2009 2009-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2747353/ /pubmed/19774117 Text en © 2009 Deschamps et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Deschamps, Benoit Musaji, Naomi Gillespie, John A Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
title | Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
title_full | Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
title_fullStr | Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
title_full_unstemmed | Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
title_short | Food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
title_sort | food effect on the bioavailability of two distinct formulations of megestrol acetate oral suspension |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19774117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deschampsbenoit foodeffectonthebioavailabilityoftwodistinctformulationsofmegestrolacetateoralsuspension AT musajinaomi foodeffectonthebioavailabilityoftwodistinctformulationsofmegestrolacetateoralsuspension AT gillespiejohna foodeffectonthebioavailabilityoftwodistinctformulationsofmegestrolacetateoralsuspension |