Cargando…
Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
Various histologic classification systems have been proposed as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of Goseki classification as well as the TNM staging system, histological tumour grading, Lauren, WHO, Goseki and Siewert classifications in 100 patients with cardia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12569383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600663 |
_version_ | 1782172104796405760 |
---|---|
author | Fontana, M G La Pinta, M Moneghini, D Villanacci, V Donato, F Rindi, G Paparini, S Baronchelli, C Bertoli, G Alquati, P |
author_facet | Fontana, M G La Pinta, M Moneghini, D Villanacci, V Donato, F Rindi, G Paparini, S Baronchelli, C Bertoli, G Alquati, P |
author_sort | Fontana, M G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various histologic classification systems have been proposed as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of Goseki classification as well as the TNM staging system, histological tumour grading, Lauren, WHO, Goseki and Siewert classifications in 100 patients with cardia carcinoma undergoing curative surgery. Two patients were lost at follow-up. The median time of follow-up in the remaining patients was 32.9 months after surgery (range: 0.1–142.1 months). No differences in survival rates were observed according to tumour grading, Lauren or WHO histologic or Siewert topographical classification. No differences were found according to Goseki classes, when considering either the mucin content of the carcinoma (types I and III vs II and IV) or the differentiation grade (types I and II vs III and IV). Multivariate analysis showed that the only lymph node positivity was a significant predictor of survival: 7.2% of patients with, but 41.5% of those without nodal involvement were alive after five years (P=0.0001). In conclusion, we found no prognostic role for Goseki or the traditional histological indexes, while the TNM staging system and particularly lymph node positivity were the main predictors of survival in patients with cardia adenocarcinoma. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2747543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27475432009-09-21 Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia Fontana, M G La Pinta, M Moneghini, D Villanacci, V Donato, F Rindi, G Paparini, S Baronchelli, C Bertoli, G Alquati, P Br J Cancer Molecular and Cellular Pathology Various histologic classification systems have been proposed as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of Goseki classification as well as the TNM staging system, histological tumour grading, Lauren, WHO, Goseki and Siewert classifications in 100 patients with cardia carcinoma undergoing curative surgery. Two patients were lost at follow-up. The median time of follow-up in the remaining patients was 32.9 months after surgery (range: 0.1–142.1 months). No differences in survival rates were observed according to tumour grading, Lauren or WHO histologic or Siewert topographical classification. No differences were found according to Goseki classes, when considering either the mucin content of the carcinoma (types I and III vs II and IV) or the differentiation grade (types I and II vs III and IV). Multivariate analysis showed that the only lymph node positivity was a significant predictor of survival: 7.2% of patients with, but 41.5% of those without nodal involvement were alive after five years (P=0.0001). In conclusion, we found no prognostic role for Goseki or the traditional histological indexes, while the TNM staging system and particularly lymph node positivity were the main predictors of survival in patients with cardia adenocarcinoma. Nature Publishing Group 2003-02-10 2003-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2747543/ /pubmed/12569383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600663 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Molecular and Cellular Pathology Fontana, M G La Pinta, M Moneghini, D Villanacci, V Donato, F Rindi, G Paparini, S Baronchelli, C Bertoli, G Alquati, P Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
title | Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
title_full | Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
title_short | Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
title_sort | prognostic value of goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia |
topic | Molecular and Cellular Pathology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12569383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fontanamg prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT lapintam prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT moneghinid prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT villanacciv prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT donatof prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT rindig prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT paparinis prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT baronchellic prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT bertolig prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia AT alquatip prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia |