Cargando…

Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia

Various histologic classification systems have been proposed as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of Goseki classification as well as the TNM staging system, histological tumour grading, Lauren, WHO, Goseki and Siewert classifications in 100 patients with cardia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontana, M G, La Pinta, M, Moneghini, D, Villanacci, V, Donato, F, Rindi, G, Paparini, S, Baronchelli, C, Bertoli, G, Alquati, P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12569383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600663
_version_ 1782172104796405760
author Fontana, M G
La Pinta, M
Moneghini, D
Villanacci, V
Donato, F
Rindi, G
Paparini, S
Baronchelli, C
Bertoli, G
Alquati, P
author_facet Fontana, M G
La Pinta, M
Moneghini, D
Villanacci, V
Donato, F
Rindi, G
Paparini, S
Baronchelli, C
Bertoli, G
Alquati, P
author_sort Fontana, M G
collection PubMed
description Various histologic classification systems have been proposed as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of Goseki classification as well as the TNM staging system, histological tumour grading, Lauren, WHO, Goseki and Siewert classifications in 100 patients with cardia carcinoma undergoing curative surgery. Two patients were lost at follow-up. The median time of follow-up in the remaining patients was 32.9 months after surgery (range: 0.1–142.1 months). No differences in survival rates were observed according to tumour grading, Lauren or WHO histologic or Siewert topographical classification. No differences were found according to Goseki classes, when considering either the mucin content of the carcinoma (types I and III vs II and IV) or the differentiation grade (types I and II vs III and IV). Multivariate analysis showed that the only lymph node positivity was a significant predictor of survival: 7.2% of patients with, but 41.5% of those without nodal involvement were alive after five years (P=0.0001). In conclusion, we found no prognostic role for Goseki or the traditional histological indexes, while the TNM staging system and particularly lymph node positivity were the main predictors of survival in patients with cardia adenocarcinoma.
format Text
id pubmed-2747543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27475432009-09-21 Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia Fontana, M G La Pinta, M Moneghini, D Villanacci, V Donato, F Rindi, G Paparini, S Baronchelli, C Bertoli, G Alquati, P Br J Cancer Molecular and Cellular Pathology Various histologic classification systems have been proposed as prognostic factors for gastric cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of Goseki classification as well as the TNM staging system, histological tumour grading, Lauren, WHO, Goseki and Siewert classifications in 100 patients with cardia carcinoma undergoing curative surgery. Two patients were lost at follow-up. The median time of follow-up in the remaining patients was 32.9 months after surgery (range: 0.1–142.1 months). No differences in survival rates were observed according to tumour grading, Lauren or WHO histologic or Siewert topographical classification. No differences were found according to Goseki classes, when considering either the mucin content of the carcinoma (types I and III vs II and IV) or the differentiation grade (types I and II vs III and IV). Multivariate analysis showed that the only lymph node positivity was a significant predictor of survival: 7.2% of patients with, but 41.5% of those without nodal involvement were alive after five years (P=0.0001). In conclusion, we found no prognostic role for Goseki or the traditional histological indexes, while the TNM staging system and particularly lymph node positivity were the main predictors of survival in patients with cardia adenocarcinoma. Nature Publishing Group 2003-02-10 2003-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2747543/ /pubmed/12569383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600663 Text en Copyright © 2003 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular and Cellular Pathology
Fontana, M G
La Pinta, M
Moneghini, D
Villanacci, V
Donato, F
Rindi, G
Paparini, S
Baronchelli, C
Bertoli, G
Alquati, P
Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
title Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
title_full Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
title_fullStr Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
title_short Prognostic value of Goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
title_sort prognostic value of goseki histological classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia
topic Molecular and Cellular Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12569383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600663
work_keys_str_mv AT fontanamg prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT lapintam prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT moneghinid prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT villanacciv prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT donatof prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT rindig prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT paparinis prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT baronchellic prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT bertolig prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia
AT alquatip prognosticvalueofgosekihistologicalclassificationinadenocarcinomaofthecardia