Cargando…

Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature

Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vardy, J, Engelhardt, K, Cox, K, Jacquet, J, McDade, A, Boyer, M, Beale, P, Stockler, M, Loneragan, R, Dennien, B, Waugh, R, Clarke, S J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15316563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082
_version_ 1782172122819330048
author Vardy, J
Engelhardt, K
Cox, K
Jacquet, J
McDade, A
Boyer, M
Beale, P
Stockler, M
Loneragan, R
Dennien, B
Waugh, R
Clarke, S J
author_facet Vardy, J
Engelhardt, K
Cox, K
Jacquet, J
McDade, A
Boyer, M
Beale, P
Stockler, M
Loneragan, R
Dennien, B
Waugh, R
Clarke, S J
author_sort Vardy, J
collection PubMed
description Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complication rate, and duration that the CVAPD remained functional, following insertion by interventional radiologists in patients with solid tumours. A prospective study was undertaken in 110 consecutive patients who had insertion of 111 subclavian CVAPD. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 17–83), 64 were females; 68 patients (61%) had gastrointestinal tumours and 25 (23%) had breast cancer. CVAPD were successfully implanted in all but one patient. There were four (4%) immediate major complications: thrombosis 2 and pneumothorax 2. Nine patients (8%) had bruising or pain. Four devices (4%) became infected. In total, 100 CVAPD (90%) were either removed as planned at the end of treatment (n=23) after a median 203 days, or remained in situ for a median of 237 days (7–1133). Premature removal occurred in eight patients due to infection (n=4), thrombosis (n=3) or faulty device (n=1). Four patients were lost to follow-up. Radiological insertion of CVAPD is safe and convenient with low rates of complications.
format Text
id pubmed-2747721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27477212009-09-21 Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature Vardy, J Engelhardt, K Cox, K Jacquet, J McDade, A Boyer, M Beale, P Stockler, M Loneragan, R Dennien, B Waugh, R Clarke, S J Br J Cancer Clinical Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complication rate, and duration that the CVAPD remained functional, following insertion by interventional radiologists in patients with solid tumours. A prospective study was undertaken in 110 consecutive patients who had insertion of 111 subclavian CVAPD. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 17–83), 64 were females; 68 patients (61%) had gastrointestinal tumours and 25 (23%) had breast cancer. CVAPD were successfully implanted in all but one patient. There were four (4%) immediate major complications: thrombosis 2 and pneumothorax 2. Nine patients (8%) had bruising or pain. Four devices (4%) became infected. In total, 100 CVAPD (90%) were either removed as planned at the end of treatment (n=23) after a median 203 days, or remained in situ for a median of 237 days (7–1133). Premature removal occurred in eight patients due to infection (n=4), thrombosis (n=3) or faulty device (n=1). Four patients were lost to follow-up. Radiological insertion of CVAPD is safe and convenient with low rates of complications. Nature Publishing Group 2004-09-13 2004-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2747721/ /pubmed/15316563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Vardy, J
Engelhardt, K
Cox, K
Jacquet, J
McDade, A
Boyer, M
Beale, P
Stockler, M
Loneragan, R
Dennien, B
Waugh, R
Clarke, S J
Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
title Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
title_full Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
title_fullStr Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
title_short Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
title_sort long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (cvapd) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15316563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082
work_keys_str_mv AT vardyj longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT engelhardtk longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT coxk longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT jacquetj longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT mcdadea longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT boyerm longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT bealep longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT stocklerm longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT loneraganr longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT dennienb longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT waughr longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature
AT clarkesj longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature