Cargando…
Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature
Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complicatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15316563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082 |
_version_ | 1782172122819330048 |
---|---|
author | Vardy, J Engelhardt, K Cox, K Jacquet, J McDade, A Boyer, M Beale, P Stockler, M Loneragan, R Dennien, B Waugh, R Clarke, S J |
author_facet | Vardy, J Engelhardt, K Cox, K Jacquet, J McDade, A Boyer, M Beale, P Stockler, M Loneragan, R Dennien, B Waugh, R Clarke, S J |
author_sort | Vardy, J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complication rate, and duration that the CVAPD remained functional, following insertion by interventional radiologists in patients with solid tumours. A prospective study was undertaken in 110 consecutive patients who had insertion of 111 subclavian CVAPD. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 17–83), 64 were females; 68 patients (61%) had gastrointestinal tumours and 25 (23%) had breast cancer. CVAPD were successfully implanted in all but one patient. There were four (4%) immediate major complications: thrombosis 2 and pneumothorax 2. Nine patients (8%) had bruising or pain. Four devices (4%) became infected. In total, 100 CVAPD (90%) were either removed as planned at the end of treatment (n=23) after a median 203 days, or remained in situ for a median of 237 days (7–1133). Premature removal occurred in eight patients due to infection (n=4), thrombosis (n=3) or faulty device (n=1). Four patients were lost to follow-up. Radiological insertion of CVAPD is safe and convenient with low rates of complications. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2747721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27477212009-09-21 Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature Vardy, J Engelhardt, K Cox, K Jacquet, J McDade, A Boyer, M Beale, P Stockler, M Loneragan, R Dennien, B Waugh, R Clarke, S J Br J Cancer Clinical Central venous access port devices (CVAPD) are necessary for delivery of prolonged infusional chemotherapy or in patients with poor peripheral venous access. Previous studies of Hickman catheters report complication rates in about 45% of patients. Our aim was to assess the early and late complication rate, and duration that the CVAPD remained functional, following insertion by interventional radiologists in patients with solid tumours. A prospective study was undertaken in 110 consecutive patients who had insertion of 111 subclavian CVAPD. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 17–83), 64 were females; 68 patients (61%) had gastrointestinal tumours and 25 (23%) had breast cancer. CVAPD were successfully implanted in all but one patient. There were four (4%) immediate major complications: thrombosis 2 and pneumothorax 2. Nine patients (8%) had bruising or pain. Four devices (4%) became infected. In total, 100 CVAPD (90%) were either removed as planned at the end of treatment (n=23) after a median 203 days, or remained in situ for a median of 237 days (7–1133). Premature removal occurred in eight patients due to infection (n=4), thrombosis (n=3) or faulty device (n=1). Four patients were lost to follow-up. Radiological insertion of CVAPD is safe and convenient with low rates of complications. Nature Publishing Group 2004-09-13 2004-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2747721/ /pubmed/15316563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Vardy, J Engelhardt, K Cox, K Jacquet, J McDade, A Boyer, M Beale, P Stockler, M Loneragan, R Dennien, B Waugh, R Clarke, S J Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
title | Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
title_full | Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
title_short | Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
title_sort | long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (cvapd) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15316563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vardyj longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT engelhardtk longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT coxk longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT jacquetj longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT mcdadea longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT boyerm longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT bealep longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT stocklerm longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT loneraganr longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT dennienb longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT waughr longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature AT clarkesj longtermoutcomeofradiologicalguidedinsertionofimplantedcentralvenousaccessportdevicescvapdforthedeliveryofchemotherapyincancerpatientsinstitutionalexperienceandreviewoftheliterature |