Cargando…
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
BACKGROUND: Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. AIM: To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-78 |
_version_ | 1782172123724251136 |
---|---|
author | Koczulla, Rembert Dragonieri, Silvano Schot, Robert Bals, Robert Gauw, Stefanie A Vogelmeier, Claus Rabe, Klaus F Sterk, Peter J Hiemstra, Pieter S |
author_facet | Koczulla, Rembert Dragonieri, Silvano Schot, Robert Bals, Robert Gauw, Stefanie A Vogelmeier, Claus Rabe, Klaus F Sterk, Peter J Hiemstra, Pieter S |
author_sort | Koczulla, Rembert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. AIM: To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls. METHODS: EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min. RESULTS: In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2747836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27478362009-09-22 Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients Koczulla, Rembert Dragonieri, Silvano Schot, Robert Bals, Robert Gauw, Stefanie A Vogelmeier, Claus Rabe, Klaus F Sterk, Peter J Hiemstra, Pieter S Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. AIM: To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls. METHODS: EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min. RESULTS: In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold. BioMed Central 2009 2009-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2747836/ /pubmed/19703285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-78 Text en Copyright ©2009 Koczulla et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Koczulla, Rembert Dragonieri, Silvano Schot, Robert Bals, Robert Gauw, Stefanie A Vogelmeier, Claus Rabe, Klaus F Sterk, Peter J Hiemstra, Pieter S Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title | Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_full | Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_short | Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_sort | comparison of exhaled breath condensate ph using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and copd patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-78 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koczullarembert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT dragonierisilvano comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT schotrobert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT balsrobert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT gauwstefaniea comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT vogelmeierclaus comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT rabeklausf comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT sterkpeterj comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT hiemstrapieters comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients |