Cargando…

Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients

BACKGROUND: Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. AIM: To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koczulla, Rembert, Dragonieri, Silvano, Schot, Robert, Bals, Robert, Gauw, Stefanie A, Vogelmeier, Claus, Rabe, Klaus F, Sterk, Peter J, Hiemstra, Pieter S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-78
_version_ 1782172123724251136
author Koczulla, Rembert
Dragonieri, Silvano
Schot, Robert
Bals, Robert
Gauw, Stefanie A
Vogelmeier, Claus
Rabe, Klaus F
Sterk, Peter J
Hiemstra, Pieter S
author_facet Koczulla, Rembert
Dragonieri, Silvano
Schot, Robert
Bals, Robert
Gauw, Stefanie A
Vogelmeier, Claus
Rabe, Klaus F
Sterk, Peter J
Hiemstra, Pieter S
author_sort Koczulla, Rembert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. AIM: To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls. METHODS: EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min. RESULTS: In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold.
format Text
id pubmed-2747836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27478362009-09-22 Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients Koczulla, Rembert Dragonieri, Silvano Schot, Robert Bals, Robert Gauw, Stefanie A Vogelmeier, Claus Rabe, Klaus F Sterk, Peter J Hiemstra, Pieter S Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. AIM: To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls. METHODS: EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min. RESULTS: In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold. BioMed Central 2009 2009-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2747836/ /pubmed/19703285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-78 Text en Copyright ©2009 Koczulla et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Koczulla, Rembert
Dragonieri, Silvano
Schot, Robert
Bals, Robert
Gauw, Stefanie A
Vogelmeier, Claus
Rabe, Klaus F
Sterk, Peter J
Hiemstra, Pieter S
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
title Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
title_full Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
title_fullStr Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
title_short Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
title_sort comparison of exhaled breath condensate ph using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and copd patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19703285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-78
work_keys_str_mv AT koczullarembert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT dragonierisilvano comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT schotrobert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT balsrobert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT gauwstefaniea comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT vogelmeierclaus comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT rabeklausf comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT sterkpeterj comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients
AT hiemstrapieters comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients