Cargando…
Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings
BACKGROUND: After its introduction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy rapidly expanded around the world and was accepted the procedure of choice by consensus. However, analysis of evidence shows no difference regarding primary outcome measures between laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy. In a...
Autores principales: | Keus, Frederik, de Jonge, Trudy, Gooszen, Hein G, Buskens, Erik, van Laarhoven, Cornelis JHM |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2748072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19732431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-80 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessing factors influencing return back to work after cholecystectomy: a qualitative research
por: Keus, Frederik, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: Health status in a blind randomised trial
por: Keus, Frederik, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Evidence at a glance: error matrix approach for overviewing available evidence
por: Keus, Frederik, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
A systematic review of individual patient data meta-analyses on surgical interventions
por: Hannink, Gerjon, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
por: Lee, Sun Min, et al.
Publicado: (2021)