Cargando…

Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility

BACKGROUND: Clinical association studies have yielded varied results regarding the impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency upon susceptibility to malaria. Analyses have been complicated by varied methods used to diagnose G6PD deficiency. METHODOLOGY/PRINICIPAL FINDINGS: We comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Marla K., Clark, Tamara D., Njama-Meya, Denise, Rosenthal, Philip J., Parikh, Sunil
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2748715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19789650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007246
_version_ 1782172146372444160
author Johnson, Marla K.
Clark, Tamara D.
Njama-Meya, Denise
Rosenthal, Philip J.
Parikh, Sunil
author_facet Johnson, Marla K.
Clark, Tamara D.
Njama-Meya, Denise
Rosenthal, Philip J.
Parikh, Sunil
author_sort Johnson, Marla K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical association studies have yielded varied results regarding the impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency upon susceptibility to malaria. Analyses have been complicated by varied methods used to diagnose G6PD deficiency. METHODOLOGY/PRINICIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the association between uncomplicated malaria incidence and G6PD deficiency in a cohort of 601 Ugandan children using two different diagnostic methods, enzyme activity and G6PD genotype (G202A, the predominant East African allele). Although roughly the same percentage of males were identified as deficient using enzyme activity (12%) and genotype (14%), nearly 30% of males who were enzymatically deficient were wild-type at G202A. The number of deficient females was three-fold higher with assessment by genotype (21%) compared to enzyme activity (7%). Heterozygous females accounted for the majority (46/54) of children with a mutant genotype but normal enzyme activity. G6PD deficiency, as determined by G6PD enzyme activity, conferred a 52% (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.31–0.75) reduced risk of uncomplicated malaria in females. In contrast, when G6PD deficiency was defined based on genotype, the protective association for females was no longer seen (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.70–1.39). Notably, restricting the analysis to those females who were both genotypically and enzymatically deficient, the association of deficiency and protection from uncomplicated malaria was again demonstrated in females, but not in males (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.88 for females). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study underscores the impact that the method of identifying G6PD deficient individuals has upon association studies of G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria. We found that G6PD-deficient females were significantly protected against uncomplicated malaria, but this protection was only seen when G6PD deficiency is described using enzyme activity. These observations may help to explain the discrepancy in some published association studies involving G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria.
format Text
id pubmed-2748715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27487152009-09-30 Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility Johnson, Marla K. Clark, Tamara D. Njama-Meya, Denise Rosenthal, Philip J. Parikh, Sunil PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical association studies have yielded varied results regarding the impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency upon susceptibility to malaria. Analyses have been complicated by varied methods used to diagnose G6PD deficiency. METHODOLOGY/PRINICIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the association between uncomplicated malaria incidence and G6PD deficiency in a cohort of 601 Ugandan children using two different diagnostic methods, enzyme activity and G6PD genotype (G202A, the predominant East African allele). Although roughly the same percentage of males were identified as deficient using enzyme activity (12%) and genotype (14%), nearly 30% of males who were enzymatically deficient were wild-type at G202A. The number of deficient females was three-fold higher with assessment by genotype (21%) compared to enzyme activity (7%). Heterozygous females accounted for the majority (46/54) of children with a mutant genotype but normal enzyme activity. G6PD deficiency, as determined by G6PD enzyme activity, conferred a 52% (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.31–0.75) reduced risk of uncomplicated malaria in females. In contrast, when G6PD deficiency was defined based on genotype, the protective association for females was no longer seen (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.70–1.39). Notably, restricting the analysis to those females who were both genotypically and enzymatically deficient, the association of deficiency and protection from uncomplicated malaria was again demonstrated in females, but not in males (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.88 for females). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study underscores the impact that the method of identifying G6PD deficient individuals has upon association studies of G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria. We found that G6PD-deficient females were significantly protected against uncomplicated malaria, but this protection was only seen when G6PD deficiency is described using enzyme activity. These observations may help to explain the discrepancy in some published association studies involving G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria. Public Library of Science 2009-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2748715/ /pubmed/19789650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007246 Text en Johnson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Marla K.
Clark, Tamara D.
Njama-Meya, Denise
Rosenthal, Philip J.
Parikh, Sunil
Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility
title Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility
title_full Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility
title_fullStr Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility
title_short Impact of the Method of G6PD Deficiency Assessment on Genetic Association Studies of Malaria Susceptibility
title_sort impact of the method of g6pd deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2748715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19789650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007246
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmarlak impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT clarktamarad impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT njamameyadenise impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT rosenthalphilipj impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT parikhsunil impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility