Cargando…

Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether neonatal nasogastric enteral feeding tubes are colonised by the opportunistic pathogen Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii) and other Enterobacteriaceae, and whether their presence was influenced by the feeding regime. METHODS: On...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurrell, Edward, Kucerova, Eva, Loughlin, Michael, Caubilla-Barron, Juncal, Hilton, Anthony, Armstrong, Richard, Smith, Craig, Grant, Judith, Shoo, Shiu, Forsythe, Stephen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2749046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19723318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-146
_version_ 1782172159329697792
author Hurrell, Edward
Kucerova, Eva
Loughlin, Michael
Caubilla-Barron, Juncal
Hilton, Anthony
Armstrong, Richard
Smith, Craig
Grant, Judith
Shoo, Shiu
Forsythe, Stephen
author_facet Hurrell, Edward
Kucerova, Eva
Loughlin, Michael
Caubilla-Barron, Juncal
Hilton, Anthony
Armstrong, Richard
Smith, Craig
Grant, Judith
Shoo, Shiu
Forsythe, Stephen
author_sort Hurrell, Edward
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether neonatal nasogastric enteral feeding tubes are colonised by the opportunistic pathogen Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii) and other Enterobacteriaceae, and whether their presence was influenced by the feeding regime. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine tubes were collected from two neonatal intensive care units (NICU). A questionnaire on feeding regime was completed with each sample. Enterobacteriaceae present in the tubes were identified using conventional and molecular methods, and their antibiograms determined. RESULTS: The neonates were fed breast milk (16%), fortified breast milk (28%), ready to feed formula (20%), reconstituted powdered infant formula (PIF, 6%), or a mixture of these (21%). Eight percent of tubes were received from neonates who were 'nil by mouth'. Organisms were isolated from 76% of enteral feeding tubes as a biofilm (up to 10(7 )cfu/tube from neonates fed fortified breast milk and reconstituted PIF) and in the residual lumen liquid (up to 10(7 )Enterobacteriaceae cfu/ml, average volume 250 μl). The most common isolates were Enterobacter cancerogenus (41%), Serratia marcescens (36%), E. hormaechei (33%), Escherichia coli (29%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%), Raoultella terrigena (10%), and S. liquefaciens (12%). Other organisms isolated included C. sakazakii (2%),Yersinia enterocolitica (1%),Citrobacter freundii (1%), E. vulneris (1%), Pseudomonas fluorescens (1%), and P. luteola (1%). The enteral feeding tubes were in place between < 6 h (22%) to > 48 h (13%). All the S. marcescens isolates from the enteral feeding tubes were resistant to amoxicillin and co-amoxiclav. Of additional importance was that a quarter of E. hormaechei isolates were resistant to the 3(rd )generation cephalosporins ceftazidime and cefotaxime. During the period of the study, K. pneumoniae and S. marcescens caused infections in the two NICUs. CONCLUSION: This study shows that neonatal enteral feeding tubes, irrespective of feeding regime, act as loci for the bacterial attachment and multiplication of numerous opportunistic pathogens within the Enterobacteriaceae family. Subsequently, these organisms will enter the stomach as a bolus with each feed. Therefore, enteral feeding tubes are an important risk factor to consider with respect to neonatal infections.
format Text
id pubmed-2749046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27490462009-09-23 Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae Hurrell, Edward Kucerova, Eva Loughlin, Michael Caubilla-Barron, Juncal Hilton, Anthony Armstrong, Richard Smith, Craig Grant, Judith Shoo, Shiu Forsythe, Stephen BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether neonatal nasogastric enteral feeding tubes are colonised by the opportunistic pathogen Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii) and other Enterobacteriaceae, and whether their presence was influenced by the feeding regime. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine tubes were collected from two neonatal intensive care units (NICU). A questionnaire on feeding regime was completed with each sample. Enterobacteriaceae present in the tubes were identified using conventional and molecular methods, and their antibiograms determined. RESULTS: The neonates were fed breast milk (16%), fortified breast milk (28%), ready to feed formula (20%), reconstituted powdered infant formula (PIF, 6%), or a mixture of these (21%). Eight percent of tubes were received from neonates who were 'nil by mouth'. Organisms were isolated from 76% of enteral feeding tubes as a biofilm (up to 10(7 )cfu/tube from neonates fed fortified breast milk and reconstituted PIF) and in the residual lumen liquid (up to 10(7 )Enterobacteriaceae cfu/ml, average volume 250 μl). The most common isolates were Enterobacter cancerogenus (41%), Serratia marcescens (36%), E. hormaechei (33%), Escherichia coli (29%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%), Raoultella terrigena (10%), and S. liquefaciens (12%). Other organisms isolated included C. sakazakii (2%),Yersinia enterocolitica (1%),Citrobacter freundii (1%), E. vulneris (1%), Pseudomonas fluorescens (1%), and P. luteola (1%). The enteral feeding tubes were in place between < 6 h (22%) to > 48 h (13%). All the S. marcescens isolates from the enteral feeding tubes were resistant to amoxicillin and co-amoxiclav. Of additional importance was that a quarter of E. hormaechei isolates were resistant to the 3(rd )generation cephalosporins ceftazidime and cefotaxime. During the period of the study, K. pneumoniae and S. marcescens caused infections in the two NICUs. CONCLUSION: This study shows that neonatal enteral feeding tubes, irrespective of feeding regime, act as loci for the bacterial attachment and multiplication of numerous opportunistic pathogens within the Enterobacteriaceae family. Subsequently, these organisms will enter the stomach as a bolus with each feed. Therefore, enteral feeding tubes are an important risk factor to consider with respect to neonatal infections. BioMed Central 2009-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2749046/ /pubmed/19723318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-146 Text en Copyright ©2009 Hurrell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hurrell, Edward
Kucerova, Eva
Loughlin, Michael
Caubilla-Barron, Juncal
Hilton, Anthony
Armstrong, Richard
Smith, Craig
Grant, Judith
Shoo, Shiu
Forsythe, Stephen
Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae
title Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae
title_full Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae
title_fullStr Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae
title_short Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae
title_sort neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the enterobacteriaceae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2749046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19723318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-146
work_keys_str_mv AT hurrelledward neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT kucerovaeva neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT loughlinmichael neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT caubillabarronjuncal neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT hiltonanthony neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT armstrongrichard neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT smithcraig neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT grantjudith neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT shooshiu neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae
AT forsythestephen neonatalenteralfeedingtubesaslociforcolonisationbymembersoftheenterobacteriaceae