Cargando…

Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate

Until recently, only bovine-derived thrombin was available for use as a stand-alone topical hemostat or as a component of other hemostatic devices. Concerns over a number of case reports of immune-mediated coagulopathies associated with the use of bovine-derived thrombin resulted in a United States...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lomax, Christopher
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2749812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19732447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-21
_version_ 1782172185213796352
author Lomax, Christopher
author_facet Lomax, Christopher
author_sort Lomax, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Until recently, only bovine-derived thrombin was available for use as a stand-alone topical hemostat or as a component of other hemostatic devices. Concerns over a number of case reports of immune-mediated coagulopathies associated with the use of bovine-derived thrombin resulted in a United States Food and Drug Administration warning letter being issued in 1996 and the later addition of a boxed warning ("Black Box Warning") to all bovine-derived thrombin products. Since 2007, both a human-pooled plasma thrombin product and a recombinant thrombin have entered the market. With the addition of these two products to the topical thrombin class, a unique situation has developed in which only a single member (bovine-derived thrombin) within the class carries the Food and Drug Administration's strongest cautionary language about possible adverse events related to an agent's use. Neither the human-pooled plasma thrombin nor the recombinant thrombin products have a boxed warning; although, the human-pooled plasma product does include a precaution/warning about infectious agent transmission - a warning common to products derived from human sources. This report will address this unique situation and the impact, clinical and non-clinical, that thrombin choice may have. Since alternatives are now available, institutions may need to revisit their formulary choice of thrombin preparation, taking into consideration the potential risks associated with bovine-derived products.
format Text
id pubmed-2749812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27498122009-09-24 Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate Lomax, Christopher Patient Saf Surg Debate Until recently, only bovine-derived thrombin was available for use as a stand-alone topical hemostat or as a component of other hemostatic devices. Concerns over a number of case reports of immune-mediated coagulopathies associated with the use of bovine-derived thrombin resulted in a United States Food and Drug Administration warning letter being issued in 1996 and the later addition of a boxed warning ("Black Box Warning") to all bovine-derived thrombin products. Since 2007, both a human-pooled plasma thrombin product and a recombinant thrombin have entered the market. With the addition of these two products to the topical thrombin class, a unique situation has developed in which only a single member (bovine-derived thrombin) within the class carries the Food and Drug Administration's strongest cautionary language about possible adverse events related to an agent's use. Neither the human-pooled plasma thrombin nor the recombinant thrombin products have a boxed warning; although, the human-pooled plasma product does include a precaution/warning about infectious agent transmission - a warning common to products derived from human sources. This report will address this unique situation and the impact, clinical and non-clinical, that thrombin choice may have. Since alternatives are now available, institutions may need to revisit their formulary choice of thrombin preparation, taking into consideration the potential risks associated with bovine-derived products. BioMed Central 2009-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2749812/ /pubmed/19732447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-21 Text en Copyright © 2009 Lomax; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Lomax, Christopher
Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
title Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
title_full Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
title_fullStr Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
title_full_unstemmed Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
title_short Safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
title_sort safety of topical thrombins: the ongoing debate
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2749812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19732447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-21
work_keys_str_mv AT lomaxchristopher safetyoftopicalthrombinstheongoingdebate