Cargando…

Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe

AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate whether protection with rubber or plastic gloves during post-mortem explantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers enough protection for the explanting operator during a worst-case scenario (i.e. ICD shock). METHODS AND RESULTS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Räder, Sune B.E.W., Zeijlemaker, Volkert, Pehrson, Steen, Svendsen, Jesper H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2751617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19797147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup249
_version_ 1782172248578195456
author Räder, Sune B.E.W.
Zeijlemaker, Volkert
Pehrson, Steen
Svendsen, Jesper H.
author_facet Räder, Sune B.E.W.
Zeijlemaker, Volkert
Pehrson, Steen
Svendsen, Jesper H.
author_sort Räder, Sune B.E.W.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate whether protection with rubber or plastic gloves during post-mortem explantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers enough protection for the explanting operator during a worst-case scenario (i.e. ICD shock). METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the insulating properties of rubber and plastic gloves (double layer) within the first 60 min exposure (mimicking the maximum time of an explantation procedure) to saline (simulating the effects of body fluids on the gloves). For latex gloves, we measured an increase in voltage up to 68.1 V (P < 0.0001), for neoprene a maximum voltage of 5.3 V (P = 0.245), and for plastic a voltage of 2.3 V within the first hour. If the exposure time to fluid did not exceed 50 min, a double pair of intact gloves made of latex, neoprene, or plastic constituted such a large resistance that the resting voltage over the operating person would not exceed 50 V. CONCLUSION: The use of intact medical gloves made of latex, neoprene, or plastic eliminates the potential electrical risk during explantation of an ICD. Two gloves on each hand offer sufficient protection. We will recommend the use of neoprene gloves.
format Text
id pubmed-2751617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27516172009-10-01 Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe Räder, Sune B.E.W. Zeijlemaker, Volkert Pehrson, Steen Svendsen, Jesper H. Europace Clinical Research AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate whether protection with rubber or plastic gloves during post-mortem explantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers enough protection for the explanting operator during a worst-case scenario (i.e. ICD shock). METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the insulating properties of rubber and plastic gloves (double layer) within the first 60 min exposure (mimicking the maximum time of an explantation procedure) to saline (simulating the effects of body fluids on the gloves). For latex gloves, we measured an increase in voltage up to 68.1 V (P < 0.0001), for neoprene a maximum voltage of 5.3 V (P = 0.245), and for plastic a voltage of 2.3 V within the first hour. If the exposure time to fluid did not exceed 50 min, a double pair of intact gloves made of latex, neoprene, or plastic constituted such a large resistance that the resting voltage over the operating person would not exceed 50 V. CONCLUSION: The use of intact medical gloves made of latex, neoprene, or plastic eliminates the potential electrical risk during explantation of an ICD. Two gloves on each hand offer sufficient protection. We will recommend the use of neoprene gloves. Oxford University Press 2009-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2751617/ /pubmed/19797147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup249 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Räder, Sune B.E.W.
Zeijlemaker, Volkert
Pehrson, Steen
Svendsen, Jesper H.
Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
title Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
title_full Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
title_fullStr Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
title_full_unstemmed Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
title_short Making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
title_sort making post-mortem implantable cardioverter defibrillator explantation safe
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2751617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19797147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup249
work_keys_str_mv AT radersunebew makingpostmortemimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorexplantationsafe
AT zeijlemakervolkert makingpostmortemimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorexplantationsafe
AT pehrsonsteen makingpostmortemimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorexplantationsafe
AT svendsenjesperh makingpostmortemimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorexplantationsafe