Cargando…

Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study

Objective To evaluate if prostate specific antigen test attains validity standards required for screening in view of recent prostate cancer screening trial results. Design Case-control study nested in longitudinal cohort. Setting Västerbotten Intervention Project cohort, Umeå, Sweden. Participants 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmström, Benny, Johansson, Mattias, Bergh, Anders, Stenman, Ulf-Håkan, Hallmans, Göran, Stattin, Pär
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2751815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19778969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3537
Descripción
Sumario:Objective To evaluate if prostate specific antigen test attains validity standards required for screening in view of recent prostate cancer screening trial results. Design Case-control study nested in longitudinal cohort. Setting Västerbotten Intervention Project cohort, Umeå, Sweden. Participants 540 cases and 1034 controls matched for age and date of blood draw. Main outcome measure Validity of prostate specific antigen for prediction of subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis by record linkage to cancer registry. Results Blood samples were drawn on average 7.1 (SD 3.7) years before diagnosis. The area under the curve for prostate specific antigen was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.86). At prostate specific antigen cut-off values of 3, 4, and 5 ng/ml, sensitivity estimates were 59%, 44%, and 33%, and specificity estimates were 87%, 92%, and 95%. The positive likelihood ratio commonly considered to “rule in disease” is 10; in this study the positive likelihood ratios were 4.5, 5.5, and 6.4 for prostate specific antigen cut-off values of 3, 4, and 5 ng/ml. The negative likelihood ratio commonly considered to “rule out disease” is 0.1; in this study the negative likelihood ratios were 0.47, 0.61, and 0.70 for prostate specific antigen cut-off values of 3, 4, and 5 ng/ml. For a cut-off of 1.0 ng/ml, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08. Conclusions No single cut-off value for prostate specific antigen concentration attained likelihood ratios formally required for a screening test. Prostate specific antigen concentrations below 1.0 ng/ml virtually ruled out a prostate cancer diagnosis during the follow-up. Additional biomarkers for early detection of prostate cancer are needed before population based screening for prostate cancer should be introduced.