Cargando…

Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 10-15% of all clinically recognised pregnancies result in a spontaneous abortion or miscarriage. Previous studies have indicated that in up to 50% of first trimester miscarriages, chromosomal abnormalities can be identified. For several decades chromosome analysis ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menten, Björn, Swerts, Katrien, Chiaie, Barbara Delle, Janssens, Sandra, Buysse, Karen, Philippé, Jan, Speleman, Frank
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2753309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19751515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-89
_version_ 1782172330496098304
author Menten, Björn
Swerts, Katrien
Chiaie, Barbara Delle
Janssens, Sandra
Buysse, Karen
Philippé, Jan
Speleman, Frank
author_facet Menten, Björn
Swerts, Katrien
Chiaie, Barbara Delle
Janssens, Sandra
Buysse, Karen
Philippé, Jan
Speleman, Frank
author_sort Menten, Björn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 10-15% of all clinically recognised pregnancies result in a spontaneous abortion or miscarriage. Previous studies have indicated that in up to 50% of first trimester miscarriages, chromosomal abnormalities can be identified. For several decades chromosome analysis has been the golden standard to detect these genomic imbalances. A major drawback of this method is the requirement of short term cultures of fetal cells. In this study we evaluated the combined use of array CGH and flow cytometry (FCM), for detection of chromosomal abnormalities, as an alternative for karyotyping. METHODS: In total 100 spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples were investigated by karyotyping and array CGH in combination with FCM in order to compare the results for both methods. RESULTS: Chromosome analysis revealed 17 abnormal karyotypes whereas array CGH in combination with FCM identified 26 aberrations due to the increased test success rate. Karyotyping was unsuccessful in 28% of cases as compared to only two out of hundred samples with inconclusive results for combined array CGH and FCM analysis. CONCLUSION: This study convincingly shows that array CGH analysis for detection of numerical and segmental imbalances in combination with flow cytometry for detection of ploidy status has a significant higher detection rate for chromosomal abnormalities as compared to karyotyping of miscarriages samples.
format Text
id pubmed-2753309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27533092009-09-29 Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples Menten, Björn Swerts, Katrien Chiaie, Barbara Delle Janssens, Sandra Buysse, Karen Philippé, Jan Speleman, Frank BMC Med Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 10-15% of all clinically recognised pregnancies result in a spontaneous abortion or miscarriage. Previous studies have indicated that in up to 50% of first trimester miscarriages, chromosomal abnormalities can be identified. For several decades chromosome analysis has been the golden standard to detect these genomic imbalances. A major drawback of this method is the requirement of short term cultures of fetal cells. In this study we evaluated the combined use of array CGH and flow cytometry (FCM), for detection of chromosomal abnormalities, as an alternative for karyotyping. METHODS: In total 100 spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples were investigated by karyotyping and array CGH in combination with FCM in order to compare the results for both methods. RESULTS: Chromosome analysis revealed 17 abnormal karyotypes whereas array CGH in combination with FCM identified 26 aberrations due to the increased test success rate. Karyotyping was unsuccessful in 28% of cases as compared to only two out of hundred samples with inconclusive results for combined array CGH and FCM analysis. CONCLUSION: This study convincingly shows that array CGH analysis for detection of numerical and segmental imbalances in combination with flow cytometry for detection of ploidy status has a significant higher detection rate for chromosomal abnormalities as compared to karyotyping of miscarriages samples. BioMed Central 2009-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2753309/ /pubmed/19751515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-89 Text en Copyright © 2009 Menten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Menten, Björn
Swerts, Katrien
Chiaie, Barbara Delle
Janssens, Sandra
Buysse, Karen
Philippé, Jan
Speleman, Frank
Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
title Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
title_full Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
title_fullStr Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
title_full_unstemmed Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
title_short Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
title_sort array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2753309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19751515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-10-89
work_keys_str_mv AT mentenbjorn arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples
AT swertskatrien arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples
AT chiaiebarbaradelle arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples
AT janssenssandra arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples
AT buyssekaren arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples
AT philippejan arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples
AT spelemanfrank arraycomparativegenomichybridizationandflowcytometryanalysisofspontaneousabortionsandmorsinuterosamples