Cargando…

Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae

BACKGROUND: The Mycobacterium leprae genome has less than 50% coding capacity and 1,133 pseudogenes. Preliminary evidence suggests that some pseudogenes are expressed. Therefore, defining pseudogene transcriptional and translational potentials of this genome should increase our understanding of thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Diana L, Slayden, Richard A, Amin, Amol, Martinez, Alejandra N, Pittman, Tana L, Mira, Alex, Mitra, Anirban, Nagaraja, Valakunja, Morrison, Norman E, Moraes, Milton, Gillis, Thomas P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2753549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19706172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-397
_version_ 1782172343195402240
author Williams, Diana L
Slayden, Richard A
Amin, Amol
Martinez, Alejandra N
Pittman, Tana L
Mira, Alex
Mitra, Anirban
Nagaraja, Valakunja
Morrison, Norman E
Moraes, Milton
Gillis, Thomas P
author_facet Williams, Diana L
Slayden, Richard A
Amin, Amol
Martinez, Alejandra N
Pittman, Tana L
Mira, Alex
Mitra, Anirban
Nagaraja, Valakunja
Morrison, Norman E
Moraes, Milton
Gillis, Thomas P
author_sort Williams, Diana L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Mycobacterium leprae genome has less than 50% coding capacity and 1,133 pseudogenes. Preliminary evidence suggests that some pseudogenes are expressed. Therefore, defining pseudogene transcriptional and translational potentials of this genome should increase our understanding of their impact on M. leprae physiology. RESULTS: Gene expression analysis identified transcripts from 49% of all M. leprae genes including 57% of all ORFs and 43% of all pseudogenes in the genome. Transcribed pseudogenes were randomly distributed throughout the chromosome. Factors resulting in pseudogene transcription included: 1) co-orientation of transcribed pseudogenes with transcribed ORFs within or exclusive of operon-like structures; 2) the paucity of intrinsic stem-loop transcriptional terminators between transcribed ORFs and downstream pseudogenes; and 3) predicted pseudogene promoters. Mechanisms for translational "silencing" of pseudogene transcripts included the lack of both translational start codons and strong Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequences. Transcribed pseudogenes also contained multiple "in-frame" stop codons and high Ka/Ks ratios, compared to that of homologs in M. tuberculosis and ORFs in M. leprae. A pseudogene transcript containing an active promoter, strong SD site, a start codon, but containing two in frame stop codons yielded a protein product when expressed in E. coli. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of M. leprae's transcriptome consists of inactive gene products consuming energy and resources without potential benefit to M. leprae. Presently it is unclear what additional detrimental affect(s) this large number of inactive mRNAs has on the functional capability of this organism. Translation of these pseudogenes may play an important role in overall energy consumption and resultant pathophysiological characteristics of M. leprae. However, this study also demonstrated that multiple translational "silencing" mechanisms are present, reducing additional energy and resource expenditure required for protein production from the vast majority of these transcripts.
format Text
id pubmed-2753549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27535492009-09-29 Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae Williams, Diana L Slayden, Richard A Amin, Amol Martinez, Alejandra N Pittman, Tana L Mira, Alex Mitra, Anirban Nagaraja, Valakunja Morrison, Norman E Moraes, Milton Gillis, Thomas P BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The Mycobacterium leprae genome has less than 50% coding capacity and 1,133 pseudogenes. Preliminary evidence suggests that some pseudogenes are expressed. Therefore, defining pseudogene transcriptional and translational potentials of this genome should increase our understanding of their impact on M. leprae physiology. RESULTS: Gene expression analysis identified transcripts from 49% of all M. leprae genes including 57% of all ORFs and 43% of all pseudogenes in the genome. Transcribed pseudogenes were randomly distributed throughout the chromosome. Factors resulting in pseudogene transcription included: 1) co-orientation of transcribed pseudogenes with transcribed ORFs within or exclusive of operon-like structures; 2) the paucity of intrinsic stem-loop transcriptional terminators between transcribed ORFs and downstream pseudogenes; and 3) predicted pseudogene promoters. Mechanisms for translational "silencing" of pseudogene transcripts included the lack of both translational start codons and strong Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequences. Transcribed pseudogenes also contained multiple "in-frame" stop codons and high Ka/Ks ratios, compared to that of homologs in M. tuberculosis and ORFs in M. leprae. A pseudogene transcript containing an active promoter, strong SD site, a start codon, but containing two in frame stop codons yielded a protein product when expressed in E. coli. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of M. leprae's transcriptome consists of inactive gene products consuming energy and resources without potential benefit to M. leprae. Presently it is unclear what additional detrimental affect(s) this large number of inactive mRNAs has on the functional capability of this organism. Translation of these pseudogenes may play an important role in overall energy consumption and resultant pathophysiological characteristics of M. leprae. However, this study also demonstrated that multiple translational "silencing" mechanisms are present, reducing additional energy and resource expenditure required for protein production from the vast majority of these transcripts. BioMed Central 2009-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2753549/ /pubmed/19706172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-397 Text en Copyright © 2009 Williams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Williams, Diana L
Slayden, Richard A
Amin, Amol
Martinez, Alejandra N
Pittman, Tana L
Mira, Alex
Mitra, Anirban
Nagaraja, Valakunja
Morrison, Norman E
Moraes, Milton
Gillis, Thomas P
Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae
title Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae
title_full Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae
title_fullStr Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae
title_full_unstemmed Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae
title_short Implications of high level pseudogene transcription in Mycobacterium leprae
title_sort implications of high level pseudogene transcription in mycobacterium leprae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2753549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19706172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-397
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsdianal implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT slaydenricharda implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT aminamol implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT martinezalejandran implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT pittmantanal implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT miraalex implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT mitraanirban implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT nagarajavalakunja implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT morrisonnormane implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT moraesmilton implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae
AT gillisthomasp implicationsofhighlevelpseudogenetranscriptioninmycobacteriumleprae