Cargando…
Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial
BACKGROUND: Multiple pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth, and therefore an important cause of infant mortality and morbidity. A pessary is a simple and potentially effective measure for the prevention of preterm birth. Small studies have indicated its effectiveness, but large studies with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19761606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-44 |
_version_ | 1782172393924460544 |
---|---|
author | Hegeman, Maud A Bekedam, Dick J Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Kwee, Anneke Papatsonis, Dimitri NM van der Post, Joris AM Lim, Arianne C Scheepers, Hubertina CJ Willekes, Christine Duvekot, Johannes J Spaanderman, Marc Porath, Martina van Eyck, Jim Haak, Monique C van Pampus, Marielle G Bruinse, Hein W Mol, Ben Willem J |
author_facet | Hegeman, Maud A Bekedam, Dick J Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Kwee, Anneke Papatsonis, Dimitri NM van der Post, Joris AM Lim, Arianne C Scheepers, Hubertina CJ Willekes, Christine Duvekot, Johannes J Spaanderman, Marc Porath, Martina van Eyck, Jim Haak, Monique C van Pampus, Marielle G Bruinse, Hein W Mol, Ben Willem J |
author_sort | Hegeman, Maud A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth, and therefore an important cause of infant mortality and morbidity. A pessary is a simple and potentially effective measure for the prevention of preterm birth. Small studies have indicated its effectiveness, but large studies with sufficient power on the subject are lacking. Despite this lack of evidence, the treatment is at present applied by some gynaecologists in The Netherlands. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to investigate the hypothesis that prophylactic use of a cervical pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm delivery in multiple pregnancy. We will evaluate the costs and effects of this intervention. At study entry, cervical length will be measured. Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either a cervical pessary or no intervention. The cervical pessary will be placed in situ at 16 to 20 weeks, and will stay in situ up to 36 weeks gestation or until delivery, whatever comes first. The primary outcome is composite bad neonatal condition (perinatal death or severe morbidity). Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32 and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm labour and costs. We need to include 660 women to indicate a reduction in bad neonatal outcome from 7.2% without to 3.9% with a cervical pessary, using a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on whether a cervical pessary will decrease the incidence of early preterm birth and its concomitant bad neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: NTR 1858 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2754434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27544342009-09-30 Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial Hegeman, Maud A Bekedam, Dick J Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Kwee, Anneke Papatsonis, Dimitri NM van der Post, Joris AM Lim, Arianne C Scheepers, Hubertina CJ Willekes, Christine Duvekot, Johannes J Spaanderman, Marc Porath, Martina van Eyck, Jim Haak, Monique C van Pampus, Marielle G Bruinse, Hein W Mol, Ben Willem J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Multiple pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth, and therefore an important cause of infant mortality and morbidity. A pessary is a simple and potentially effective measure for the prevention of preterm birth. Small studies have indicated its effectiveness, but large studies with sufficient power on the subject are lacking. Despite this lack of evidence, the treatment is at present applied by some gynaecologists in The Netherlands. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to investigate the hypothesis that prophylactic use of a cervical pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm delivery in multiple pregnancy. We will evaluate the costs and effects of this intervention. At study entry, cervical length will be measured. Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either a cervical pessary or no intervention. The cervical pessary will be placed in situ at 16 to 20 weeks, and will stay in situ up to 36 weeks gestation or until delivery, whatever comes first. The primary outcome is composite bad neonatal condition (perinatal death or severe morbidity). Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32 and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm labour and costs. We need to include 660 women to indicate a reduction in bad neonatal outcome from 7.2% without to 3.9% with a cervical pessary, using a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on whether a cervical pessary will decrease the incidence of early preterm birth and its concomitant bad neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: NTR 1858 BioMed Central 2009-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2754434/ /pubmed/19761606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-44 Text en Copyright © 2009 Hegeman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hegeman, Maud A Bekedam, Dick J Bloemenkamp, Kitty WM Kwee, Anneke Papatsonis, Dimitri NM van der Post, Joris AM Lim, Arianne C Scheepers, Hubertina CJ Willekes, Christine Duvekot, Johannes J Spaanderman, Marc Porath, Martina van Eyck, Jim Haak, Monique C van Pampus, Marielle G Bruinse, Hein W Mol, Ben Willem J Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial |
title | Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial |
title_full | Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial |
title_fullStr | Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial |
title_short | Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial |
title_sort | pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the protwin trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19761606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-44 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hegemanmauda pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT bekedamdickj pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT bloemenkampkittywm pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT kweeanneke pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT papatsonisdimitrinm pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT vanderpostjorisam pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT limariannec pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT scheepershubertinacj pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT willekeschristine pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT duvekotjohannesj pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT spaandermanmarc pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT porathmartina pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT vaneyckjim pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT haakmoniquec pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT vanpampusmarielleg pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT bruinseheinw pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial AT molbenwillemj pessariesinmultiplepregnancyasapreventionofpretermbirththeprotwintrial |