Cargando…

Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling

Production efficiency models (PEMs) are based on the theory of light use efficiency (LUE) which states that a relatively constant relationship exists between photosynthetic carbon uptake and radiation receipt at the canopy level. Challenges remain however in the application of the PEM methodology to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCallum, Ian, Wagner, Wolfgang, Schmullius, Christiane, Shvidenko, Anatoly, Obersteiner, Michael, Fritz, Steffen, Nilsson, Sten
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19765285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-8
_version_ 1782172395371495424
author McCallum, Ian
Wagner, Wolfgang
Schmullius, Christiane
Shvidenko, Anatoly
Obersteiner, Michael
Fritz, Steffen
Nilsson, Sten
author_facet McCallum, Ian
Wagner, Wolfgang
Schmullius, Christiane
Shvidenko, Anatoly
Obersteiner, Michael
Fritz, Steffen
Nilsson, Sten
author_sort McCallum, Ian
collection PubMed
description Production efficiency models (PEMs) are based on the theory of light use efficiency (LUE) which states that a relatively constant relationship exists between photosynthetic carbon uptake and radiation receipt at the canopy level. Challenges remain however in the application of the PEM methodology to global net primary productivity (NPP) monitoring. The objectives of this review are as follows: 1) to describe the general functioning of six PEMs (CASA; GLO-PEM; TURC; C-Fix; MOD17; and BEAMS) identified in the literature; 2) to review each model to determine potential improvements to the general PEM methodology; 3) to review the related literature on satellite-based gross primary productivity (GPP) and NPP modeling for additional possibilities for improvement; and 4) based on this review, propose items for coordinated research. This review noted a number of possibilities for improvement to the general PEM architecture - ranging from LUE to meteorological and satellite-based inputs. Current PEMs tend to treat the globe similarly in terms of physiological and meteorological factors, often ignoring unique regional aspects. Each of the existing PEMs has developed unique methods to estimate NPP and the combination of the most successful of these could lead to improvements. It may be beneficial to develop regional PEMs that can be combined under a global framework. The results of this review suggest the creation of a hybrid PEM could bring about a significant enhancement to the PEM methodology and thus terrestrial carbon flux modeling. Key items topping the PEM research agenda identified in this review include the following: LUE should not be assumed constant, but should vary by plant functional type (PFT) or photosynthetic pathway; evidence is mounting that PEMs should consider incorporating diffuse radiation; continue to pursue relationships between satellite-derived variables and LUE, GPP and autotrophic respiration (Ra); there is an urgent need for satellite-based biomass measurements to improve Ra estimation; and satellite-based soil moisture data could improve determination of soil water stress.
format Text
id pubmed-2754440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27544402009-09-30 Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling McCallum, Ian Wagner, Wolfgang Schmullius, Christiane Shvidenko, Anatoly Obersteiner, Michael Fritz, Steffen Nilsson, Sten Carbon Balance Manag Review Production efficiency models (PEMs) are based on the theory of light use efficiency (LUE) which states that a relatively constant relationship exists between photosynthetic carbon uptake and radiation receipt at the canopy level. Challenges remain however in the application of the PEM methodology to global net primary productivity (NPP) monitoring. The objectives of this review are as follows: 1) to describe the general functioning of six PEMs (CASA; GLO-PEM; TURC; C-Fix; MOD17; and BEAMS) identified in the literature; 2) to review each model to determine potential improvements to the general PEM methodology; 3) to review the related literature on satellite-based gross primary productivity (GPP) and NPP modeling for additional possibilities for improvement; and 4) based on this review, propose items for coordinated research. This review noted a number of possibilities for improvement to the general PEM architecture - ranging from LUE to meteorological and satellite-based inputs. Current PEMs tend to treat the globe similarly in terms of physiological and meteorological factors, often ignoring unique regional aspects. Each of the existing PEMs has developed unique methods to estimate NPP and the combination of the most successful of these could lead to improvements. It may be beneficial to develop regional PEMs that can be combined under a global framework. The results of this review suggest the creation of a hybrid PEM could bring about a significant enhancement to the PEM methodology and thus terrestrial carbon flux modeling. Key items topping the PEM research agenda identified in this review include the following: LUE should not be assumed constant, but should vary by plant functional type (PFT) or photosynthetic pathway; evidence is mounting that PEMs should consider incorporating diffuse radiation; continue to pursue relationships between satellite-derived variables and LUE, GPP and autotrophic respiration (Ra); there is an urgent need for satellite-based biomass measurements to improve Ra estimation; and satellite-based soil moisture data could improve determination of soil water stress. BioMed Central 2009-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2754440/ /pubmed/19765285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-8 Text en Copyright © 2009 McCallum et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
McCallum, Ian
Wagner, Wolfgang
Schmullius, Christiane
Shvidenko, Anatoly
Obersteiner, Michael
Fritz, Steffen
Nilsson, Sten
Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
title Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
title_full Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
title_fullStr Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
title_full_unstemmed Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
title_short Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
title_sort satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19765285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mccallumian satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling
AT wagnerwolfgang satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling
AT schmulliuschristiane satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling
AT shvidenkoanatoly satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling
AT obersteinermichael satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling
AT fritzsteffen satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling
AT nilssonsten satellitebasedterrestrialproductionefficiencymodeling