Cargando…

Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND: When combined with adequate tumoricidal doses, accurate target volume delineation remains to be the one of the most important predictive factors for radiotherapy (RT) success in locally advanced or medically inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. Recently, 18-fluorodeo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pehlivan, Berrin, Topkan, Erkan, Onal, Cem, Nursal, Gul Nihal, Yuksel, Oznur, Dolek, Yemliha, Yavuz, Melek Nur, Yavuz, Ali Aydin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19758456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-35
_version_ 1782172407487791104
author Pehlivan, Berrin
Topkan, Erkan
Onal, Cem
Nursal, Gul Nihal
Yuksel, Oznur
Dolek, Yemliha
Yavuz, Melek Nur
Yavuz, Ali Aydin
author_facet Pehlivan, Berrin
Topkan, Erkan
Onal, Cem
Nursal, Gul Nihal
Yuksel, Oznur
Dolek, Yemliha
Yavuz, Melek Nur
Yavuz, Ali Aydin
author_sort Pehlivan, Berrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When combined with adequate tumoricidal doses, accurate target volume delineation remains to be the one of the most important predictive factors for radiotherapy (RT) success in locally advanced or medically inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. Recently, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) has demonstrated significant improvements in diagnosis and accurate staging of MPM. However, role of additional PET data has not been studied in RT planning (RTP) of patients with inoperable MPM or in those who refuse surgery. Therefore, we planned to compare CT with co-registered PET-CT as the basis for delineating target volumes in these patients group. METHODS: Retrospectively, the CT and co-registered PET-CT data of 13 patients with histologically proven MPM were utilized to delineate target volumes separately. For each patient, target volumes (gross tumor volume [GTV], clinical target volume [CTV], and planning target volume [PTV]) were defined using the CT and PET-CT fusion data sets. The PTV was measured in two ways: PTV1 was CTV plus a 1-cm margin, and PTV2 was GTV plus a 1-cm margin. We analyzed differences in target volumes. RESULTS: In 12 of 13 patients, compared to CT-based delineation, PET-CT-based delineation resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the mean GTV, CTV, PTV1, and PTV2. In these 12 patients, mean GTV decreased by 47.1% ± 28.4%, mean CTV decreased by 38.7% ± 24.7%, mean PTV1 decreased by 31.1% ± 23.1%, and mean PTV2 decreased by 40.0% ± 24.0%. In 4 of 13 patients, hilar lymph nodes were identified by PET-CT that was not identified by CT alone, changing the nodal status of tumor staging in those patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the usefulness of PET-CT-based target volume delineation in patients with MPM. Co-registration of PET and CT information reduces the likelihood of geographic misses, and additionally, significant reductions observed in target volumes may potentially allow escalation of RT dose beyond conventional limits potential clinical benefits in tumor control rates, which needs to be tested in future studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2754492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27544922009-09-30 Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma Pehlivan, Berrin Topkan, Erkan Onal, Cem Nursal, Gul Nihal Yuksel, Oznur Dolek, Yemliha Yavuz, Melek Nur Yavuz, Ali Aydin Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: When combined with adequate tumoricidal doses, accurate target volume delineation remains to be the one of the most important predictive factors for radiotherapy (RT) success in locally advanced or medically inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. Recently, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) has demonstrated significant improvements in diagnosis and accurate staging of MPM. However, role of additional PET data has not been studied in RT planning (RTP) of patients with inoperable MPM or in those who refuse surgery. Therefore, we planned to compare CT with co-registered PET-CT as the basis for delineating target volumes in these patients group. METHODS: Retrospectively, the CT and co-registered PET-CT data of 13 patients with histologically proven MPM were utilized to delineate target volumes separately. For each patient, target volumes (gross tumor volume [GTV], clinical target volume [CTV], and planning target volume [PTV]) were defined using the CT and PET-CT fusion data sets. The PTV was measured in two ways: PTV1 was CTV plus a 1-cm margin, and PTV2 was GTV plus a 1-cm margin. We analyzed differences in target volumes. RESULTS: In 12 of 13 patients, compared to CT-based delineation, PET-CT-based delineation resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the mean GTV, CTV, PTV1, and PTV2. In these 12 patients, mean GTV decreased by 47.1% ± 28.4%, mean CTV decreased by 38.7% ± 24.7%, mean PTV1 decreased by 31.1% ± 23.1%, and mean PTV2 decreased by 40.0% ± 24.0%. In 4 of 13 patients, hilar lymph nodes were identified by PET-CT that was not identified by CT alone, changing the nodal status of tumor staging in those patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the usefulness of PET-CT-based target volume delineation in patients with MPM. Co-registration of PET and CT information reduces the likelihood of geographic misses, and additionally, significant reductions observed in target volumes may potentially allow escalation of RT dose beyond conventional limits potential clinical benefits in tumor control rates, which needs to be tested in future studies. BioMed Central 2009-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2754492/ /pubmed/19758456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-35 Text en Copyright © 2009 Pehlivan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pehlivan, Berrin
Topkan, Erkan
Onal, Cem
Nursal, Gul Nihal
Yuksel, Oznur
Dolek, Yemliha
Yavuz, Melek Nur
Yavuz, Ali Aydin
Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_full Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_fullStr Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_short Comparison of CT and integrated PET-CT based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
title_sort comparison of ct and integrated pet-ct based radiation therapy planning in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19758456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-35
work_keys_str_mv AT pehlivanberrin comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT topkanerkan comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT onalcem comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT nursalgulnihal comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT yukseloznur comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT dolekyemliha comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT yavuzmeleknur comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma
AT yavuzaliaydin comparisonofctandintegratedpetctbasedradiationtherapyplanninginpatientswithmalignantpleuralmesothelioma