Cargando…
Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers
In case of periprosthetic hip infections the implantation of antibiotic-loaded PMMA spacers is accepted for an adequate treatment option. Although their indication for the treatment of destructive, bacterial infections of the proximal femur would make sense, literature data are scarce. Hence, the ai...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19841730 |
_version_ | 1782172436281688064 |
---|---|
author | Kelm, J. Bohrer, P. Schmitt, E. Anagnostakos, K. |
author_facet | Kelm, J. Bohrer, P. Schmitt, E. Anagnostakos, K. |
author_sort | Kelm, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In case of periprosthetic hip infections the implantation of antibiotic-loaded PMMA spacers is accepted for an adequate treatment option. Although their indication for the treatment of destructive, bacterial infections of the proximal femur would make sense, literature data are scarce. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated spacers in the treatment of proximal femur infections. In 10 consecutive patients (5 M/ 5 F, mean age 66 y.) with bacterial proximal femur infections, a femoral head/neck resection was prospectively performed with a subsequent implantation of an antibiotic-loaded spacer. The joint-specific outcome was evaluated by the Merle d´Aubigne and the Mayo hip score, the general outcome by SF-36. The time periods were divided into “infection situation”, “between stages” and meanly 1 year “after prosthesis implantation”. The spacers were meanly implanted over 90 [155-744] days. In all cases an infection eradication could be achieved. After infection eradication, a prosthesis implantation was performed in 8 cases. The general scores showed significant increases at each time period. With regard to the dimension “pain”, both scores demonstrated a significant increase between “infection situation” and “between stages”, but no significance between “between stages” and “after prosthesis implantation”. Spacers could be indicated in the treatment of proximal femur infections. Besides an infection eradication, a pain reduction is also possible. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2755122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27551222009-10-19 Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers Kelm, J. Bohrer, P. Schmitt, E. Anagnostakos, K. Int J Med Sci Research Paper In case of periprosthetic hip infections the implantation of antibiotic-loaded PMMA spacers is accepted for an adequate treatment option. Although their indication for the treatment of destructive, bacterial infections of the proximal femur would make sense, literature data are scarce. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated spacers in the treatment of proximal femur infections. In 10 consecutive patients (5 M/ 5 F, mean age 66 y.) with bacterial proximal femur infections, a femoral head/neck resection was prospectively performed with a subsequent implantation of an antibiotic-loaded spacer. The joint-specific outcome was evaluated by the Merle d´Aubigne and the Mayo hip score, the general outcome by SF-36. The time periods were divided into “infection situation”, “between stages” and meanly 1 year “after prosthesis implantation”. The spacers were meanly implanted over 90 [155-744] days. In all cases an infection eradication could be achieved. After infection eradication, a prosthesis implantation was performed in 8 cases. The general scores showed significant increases at each time period. With regard to the dimension “pain”, both scores demonstrated a significant increase between “infection situation” and “between stages”, but no significance between “between stages” and “after prosthesis implantation”. Spacers could be indicated in the treatment of proximal femur infections. Besides an infection eradication, a pain reduction is also possible. Ivyspring International Publisher 2009-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2755122/ /pubmed/19841730 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kelm, J. Bohrer, P. Schmitt, E. Anagnostakos, K. Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
title | Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
title_full | Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
title_fullStr | Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
title_short | Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
title_sort | treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19841730 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kelmj treatmentofproximalfemurinfectionswithantibioticloadedcementspacers AT bohrerp treatmentofproximalfemurinfectionswithantibioticloadedcementspacers AT schmitte treatmentofproximalfemurinfectionswithantibioticloadedcementspacers AT anagnostakosk treatmentofproximalfemurinfectionswithantibioticloadedcementspacers |