Cargando…
Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts
Many concepts have been devised for the treatment of late periprosthetic infections of total hip prostheses. A two-stage revision with a temporary antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer and a cemented prosthesis appears to be the most preferred procedure although, in recent times, there seems to be a...
Autor principal: | Fink, Bernd |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19834595 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Titanium-copper-nitride coated spacers for two-stage revision of infected total hip endoprostheses
por: Ellenrieder, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Oral Health Screening for Risk Reduction for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Hip and Knee Endoprostheses—Results of a Prospective Cohort Study
por: Fenske, Fabian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach: The pros and cons
por: Kyriakopoulos, Georgios, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Periprosthetic femoral fractures around tumor endoprostheses treated with limited revision surgery combined with allograft: A case report
por: Wu, Jianhua, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Periprosthetic joint infections in modular endoprostheses of the lower extremities: a retrospective observational study in 101 patients
por: Zajonz, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)