Cargando…

Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control

Transmission of information from the terminals group II muscle afferents is subject to potent presynaptic modulation by both segmental group II and cutaneous afferents and by descending monoaminergic systems. Currently it is unknown whether descending corticospinal fibres affect this transmission. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggelopoulos, N. C., Chakrabarty, S., Edgley, S. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18231783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1279-y
_version_ 1782172458024960000
author Aggelopoulos, N. C.
Chakrabarty, S.
Edgley, S. A.
author_facet Aggelopoulos, N. C.
Chakrabarty, S.
Edgley, S. A.
author_sort Aggelopoulos, N. C.
collection PubMed
description Transmission of information from the terminals group II muscle afferents is subject to potent presynaptic modulation by both segmental group II and cutaneous afferents and by descending monoaminergic systems. Currently it is unknown whether descending corticospinal fibres affect this transmission. Here we have examined whether corticospinal tract activation modulates the size of monosynaptic focal synaptic potentials (FSPs) evoked by group II muscle afferents, and the excitability of intraspinal terminals of group II afferents, both of which are indices used to show presynaptic control. Conditioning stimulation of corticospinal pathways had no effects on the sizes of group II evoked FSPs in the midlumbar or sacral segments at either dorsal horn or intermediate zone locations. These stimuli also had no effect on the excitability of single group II afferent terminals in the dorsal horn of the midlumbar segments. As positive controls, we verified that the corticospinal conditioning stimuli used did effectively depress FSPs evoked from cutaneous afferents recorded at the same spinal locations as the group II field potentials in all experiments. Corticospinal tract conditioning stimuli did not consistently enhance or reduce the depression of group II FSPs that was evoked by stimulation of ipsilateral segmental group II or cutaneous afferents; in the large majority of cases there was no effect. The results reveal that the control of transmission of information from group II afferents in these regions of the spinal cord is independent of direct corticospinal control.
format Text
id pubmed-2755734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27557342009-10-07 Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control Aggelopoulos, N. C. Chakrabarty, S. Edgley, S. A. Exp Brain Res Research Article Transmission of information from the terminals group II muscle afferents is subject to potent presynaptic modulation by both segmental group II and cutaneous afferents and by descending monoaminergic systems. Currently it is unknown whether descending corticospinal fibres affect this transmission. Here we have examined whether corticospinal tract activation modulates the size of monosynaptic focal synaptic potentials (FSPs) evoked by group II muscle afferents, and the excitability of intraspinal terminals of group II afferents, both of which are indices used to show presynaptic control. Conditioning stimulation of corticospinal pathways had no effects on the sizes of group II evoked FSPs in the midlumbar or sacral segments at either dorsal horn or intermediate zone locations. These stimuli also had no effect on the excitability of single group II afferent terminals in the dorsal horn of the midlumbar segments. As positive controls, we verified that the corticospinal conditioning stimuli used did effectively depress FSPs evoked from cutaneous afferents recorded at the same spinal locations as the group II field potentials in all experiments. Corticospinal tract conditioning stimuli did not consistently enhance or reduce the depression of group II FSPs that was evoked by stimulation of ipsilateral segmental group II or cutaneous afferents; in the large majority of cases there was no effect. The results reveal that the control of transmission of information from group II afferents in these regions of the spinal cord is independent of direct corticospinal control. Springer-Verlag 2008-01-30 2008-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2755734/ /pubmed/18231783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1279-y Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008
spellingShingle Research Article
Aggelopoulos, N. C.
Chakrabarty, S.
Edgley, S. A.
Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
title Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
title_full Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
title_fullStr Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
title_full_unstemmed Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
title_short Presynaptic control of transmission through group II muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
title_sort presynaptic control of transmission through group ii muscle afferents in the midlumbar and sacral segments of the spinal cord is independent of corticospinal control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18231783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1279-y
work_keys_str_mv AT aggelopoulosnc presynapticcontroloftransmissionthroughgroupiimuscleafferentsinthemidlumbarandsacralsegmentsofthespinalcordisindependentofcorticospinalcontrol
AT chakrabartys presynapticcontroloftransmissionthroughgroupiimuscleafferentsinthemidlumbarandsacralsegmentsofthespinalcordisindependentofcorticospinalcontrol
AT edgleysa presynapticcontroloftransmissionthroughgroupiimuscleafferentsinthemidlumbarandsacralsegmentsofthespinalcordisindependentofcorticospinalcontrol