Cargando…
Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring info...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17932661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1 |
_version_ | 1782172468324073472 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Katharina Aschersleben, Gisa Schmitz, Frank Schnitzler, Alfons Freund, Hans-Joachim Prinz, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Müller, Katharina Aschersleben, Gisa Schmitz, Frank Schnitzler, Alfons Freund, Hans-Joachim Prinz, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Müller, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring information from the auditory and tactile modality to coincide. The aim of the present study was to illuminate whether the synchronization error is a finding specific to an intermodal timing task and whether the underlying cortical mechanisms are modality-specific or supramodal. We collected behavioral data and cortical evoked responses by magneto-encephalography (MEG) during performance of cross- and unimodal tapping-tasks. As expected, subjects showed negative asynchrony in performing an auditorily paced tapping task. However, no asynchrony emerged during tactile pacing, neither during pacing at the opposite finger nor at the toe. Analysis of cortical signals resulted in a three dipole model best explaining tap-contingent activity in all three conditions. The temporal behavior of the sources was similar between the conditions and, thus, modality independent. The localization of the two earlier activated sources was modality-independent as well whereas location of the third source varied with modality. In the auditory pacing condition it was localized in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, during tactile pacing it was localized in contralateral posterior parietal cortex. In previous studies with auditory pacing the functional role of this third source was contradictory: A special temporal coupling pattern argued for involvement of the source in evaluating the temporal distance between tap and click whereas subsequent data gave no evidence for such an interpretation. Present data shed new light on this question by demonstrating differences between modalities in the localization of the third source with similar temporal behavior. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2755785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27557852009-10-07 Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study Müller, Katharina Aschersleben, Gisa Schmitz, Frank Schnitzler, Alfons Freund, Hans-Joachim Prinz, Wolfgang Exp Brain Res Research Article Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring information from the auditory and tactile modality to coincide. The aim of the present study was to illuminate whether the synchronization error is a finding specific to an intermodal timing task and whether the underlying cortical mechanisms are modality-specific or supramodal. We collected behavioral data and cortical evoked responses by magneto-encephalography (MEG) during performance of cross- and unimodal tapping-tasks. As expected, subjects showed negative asynchrony in performing an auditorily paced tapping task. However, no asynchrony emerged during tactile pacing, neither during pacing at the opposite finger nor at the toe. Analysis of cortical signals resulted in a three dipole model best explaining tap-contingent activity in all three conditions. The temporal behavior of the sources was similar between the conditions and, thus, modality independent. The localization of the two earlier activated sources was modality-independent as well whereas location of the third source varied with modality. In the auditory pacing condition it was localized in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, during tactile pacing it was localized in contralateral posterior parietal cortex. In previous studies with auditory pacing the functional role of this third source was contradictory: A special temporal coupling pattern argued for involvement of the source in evaluating the temporal distance between tap and click whereas subsequent data gave no evidence for such an interpretation. Present data shed new light on this question by demonstrating differences between modalities in the localization of the third source with similar temporal behavior. Springer-Verlag 2007-10-12 2008-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2755785/ /pubmed/17932661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Müller, Katharina Aschersleben, Gisa Schmitz, Frank Schnitzler, Alfons Freund, Hans-Joachim Prinz, Wolfgang Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
title | Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
title_full | Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
title_fullStr | Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
title_short | Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
title_sort | inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17932661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerkatharina interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy AT ascherslebengisa interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy AT schmitzfrank interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy AT schnitzleralfons interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy AT freundhansjoachim interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy AT prinzwolfgang interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy |