Cargando…

Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study

Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring info...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Katharina, Aschersleben, Gisa, Schmitz, Frank, Schnitzler, Alfons, Freund, Hans-Joachim, Prinz, Wolfgang
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17932661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1
_version_ 1782172468324073472
author Müller, Katharina
Aschersleben, Gisa
Schmitz, Frank
Schnitzler, Alfons
Freund, Hans-Joachim
Prinz, Wolfgang
author_facet Müller, Katharina
Aschersleben, Gisa
Schmitz, Frank
Schnitzler, Alfons
Freund, Hans-Joachim
Prinz, Wolfgang
author_sort Müller, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring information from the auditory and tactile modality to coincide. The aim of the present study was to illuminate whether the synchronization error is a finding specific to an intermodal timing task and whether the underlying cortical mechanisms are modality-specific or supramodal. We collected behavioral data and cortical evoked responses by magneto-encephalography (MEG) during performance of cross- and unimodal tapping-tasks. As expected, subjects showed negative asynchrony in performing an auditorily paced tapping task. However, no asynchrony emerged during tactile pacing, neither during pacing at the opposite finger nor at the toe. Analysis of cortical signals resulted in a three dipole model best explaining tap-contingent activity in all three conditions. The temporal behavior of the sources was similar between the conditions and, thus, modality independent. The localization of the two earlier activated sources was modality-independent as well whereas location of the third source varied with modality. In the auditory pacing condition it was localized in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, during tactile pacing it was localized in contralateral posterior parietal cortex. In previous studies with auditory pacing the functional role of this third source was contradictory: A special temporal coupling pattern argued for involvement of the source in evaluating the temporal distance between tap and click whereas subsequent data gave no evidence for such an interpretation. Present data shed new light on this question by demonstrating differences between modalities in the localization of the third source with similar temporal behavior.
format Text
id pubmed-2755785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27557852009-10-07 Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study Müller, Katharina Aschersleben, Gisa Schmitz, Frank Schnitzler, Alfons Freund, Hans-Joachim Prinz, Wolfgang Exp Brain Res Research Article Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring information from the auditory and tactile modality to coincide. The aim of the present study was to illuminate whether the synchronization error is a finding specific to an intermodal timing task and whether the underlying cortical mechanisms are modality-specific or supramodal. We collected behavioral data and cortical evoked responses by magneto-encephalography (MEG) during performance of cross- and unimodal tapping-tasks. As expected, subjects showed negative asynchrony in performing an auditorily paced tapping task. However, no asynchrony emerged during tactile pacing, neither during pacing at the opposite finger nor at the toe. Analysis of cortical signals resulted in a three dipole model best explaining tap-contingent activity in all three conditions. The temporal behavior of the sources was similar between the conditions and, thus, modality independent. The localization of the two earlier activated sources was modality-independent as well whereas location of the third source varied with modality. In the auditory pacing condition it was localized in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, during tactile pacing it was localized in contralateral posterior parietal cortex. In previous studies with auditory pacing the functional role of this third source was contradictory: A special temporal coupling pattern argued for involvement of the source in evaluating the temporal distance between tap and click whereas subsequent data gave no evidence for such an interpretation. Present data shed new light on this question by demonstrating differences between modalities in the localization of the third source with similar temporal behavior. Springer-Verlag 2007-10-12 2008-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2755785/ /pubmed/17932661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2007
spellingShingle Research Article
Müller, Katharina
Aschersleben, Gisa
Schmitz, Frank
Schnitzler, Alfons
Freund, Hans-Joachim
Prinz, Wolfgang
Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
title Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
title_full Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
title_fullStr Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
title_full_unstemmed Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
title_short Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
title_sort inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17932661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1155-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerkatharina interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy
AT ascherslebengisa interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy
AT schmitzfrank interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy
AT schnitzleralfons interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy
AT freundhansjoachim interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy
AT prinzwolfgang interversusintramodalintegrationinsensorimotorsynchronizationacombinedbehavioralandmagnetoencephalographicstudy