Cargando…

Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci

The terminology and classification of the Anginosus group streptococci has been inconsistent. We tested the utility of 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing and conventional biochemical tests for the reliable differentiation of the Anginosus group streptococci. Biochemical testing included Rapid ID...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Summanen, P. H., Rowlinson, M.-C., Wooton, J., Finegold, S. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2758201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19495818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0758-9
_version_ 1782172576596885504
author Summanen, P. H.
Rowlinson, M.-C.
Wooton, J.
Finegold, S. M.
author_facet Summanen, P. H.
Rowlinson, M.-C.
Wooton, J.
Finegold, S. M.
author_sort Summanen, P. H.
collection PubMed
description The terminology and classification of the Anginosus group streptococci has been inconsistent. We tested the utility of 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing and conventional biochemical tests for the reliable differentiation of the Anginosus group streptococci. Biochemical testing included Rapid ID 32 Strep, API Strep, Fluo-Card Milleri, Wee-tabs, and Lancefield antigen typing. Altogether, 61 Anginosus group isolates from skin and soft tissue infections and four reference strains were included. Our results showed a good agreement between 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing. Using the full sequence was less discriminatory than using the first part of the 16S rRNA gene. The three species could not be separated with the API 20 Strep test. Streptococcus intermedius could be differentiated from the other two species by β-galactosidase (ONPG) and β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase reactions. Rapid ID 32 Strep β-glucosidase reaction was useful in separating S. anginosus strains from S. constellatus. In conclusion, both 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing can be used for the reliable identification of the Anginosus group streptococci. S. intermedius can be readily differentiated from the other two species by phenotypic tests; however, 16S rRNA gene or tuf gene sequencing may be needed for separating some strains of S. constellatus from S. anginosus.
format Text
id pubmed-2758201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27582012009-10-07 Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci Summanen, P. H. Rowlinson, M.-C. Wooton, J. Finegold, S. M. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Article The terminology and classification of the Anginosus group streptococci has been inconsistent. We tested the utility of 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing and conventional biochemical tests for the reliable differentiation of the Anginosus group streptococci. Biochemical testing included Rapid ID 32 Strep, API Strep, Fluo-Card Milleri, Wee-tabs, and Lancefield antigen typing. Altogether, 61 Anginosus group isolates from skin and soft tissue infections and four reference strains were included. Our results showed a good agreement between 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing. Using the full sequence was less discriminatory than using the first part of the 16S rRNA gene. The three species could not be separated with the API 20 Strep test. Streptococcus intermedius could be differentiated from the other two species by β-galactosidase (ONPG) and β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase reactions. Rapid ID 32 Strep β-glucosidase reaction was useful in separating S. anginosus strains from S. constellatus. In conclusion, both 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing can be used for the reliable identification of the Anginosus group streptococci. S. intermedius can be readily differentiated from the other two species by phenotypic tests; however, 16S rRNA gene or tuf gene sequencing may be needed for separating some strains of S. constellatus from S. anginosus. Springer-Verlag 2009-06-04 2009-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2758201/ /pubmed/19495818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0758-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2009
spellingShingle Article
Summanen, P. H.
Rowlinson, M.-C.
Wooton, J.
Finegold, S. M.
Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci
title Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci
title_full Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci
title_fullStr Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci
title_short Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the Anginosus group streptococci
title_sort evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for differentiation of the members of the anginosus group streptococci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2758201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19495818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0758-9
work_keys_str_mv AT summanenph evaluationofgenotypicandphenotypicmethodsfordifferentiationofthemembersoftheanginosusgroupstreptococci
AT rowlinsonmc evaluationofgenotypicandphenotypicmethodsfordifferentiationofthemembersoftheanginosusgroupstreptococci
AT wootonj evaluationofgenotypicandphenotypicmethodsfordifferentiationofthemembersoftheanginosusgroupstreptococci
AT finegoldsm evaluationofgenotypicandphenotypicmethodsfordifferentiationofthemembersoftheanginosusgroupstreptococci