Cargando…

Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with collar or physiotherapy compared with a wait and see policy in recent onset cervical radiculopathy. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Neurology outpatient clinics in three Dutch hospitals. Participants 205 patients with symptoms and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuijper, Barbara, Tans, Jos Th J, Beelen, Anita, Nollet, Frans, de Visser, Marianne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2758937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19812130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3883
_version_ 1782172630136127488
author Kuijper, Barbara
Tans, Jos Th J
Beelen, Anita
Nollet, Frans
de Visser, Marianne
author_facet Kuijper, Barbara
Tans, Jos Th J
Beelen, Anita
Nollet, Frans
de Visser, Marianne
author_sort Kuijper, Barbara
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with collar or physiotherapy compared with a wait and see policy in recent onset cervical radiculopathy. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Neurology outpatient clinics in three Dutch hospitals. Participants 205 patients with symptoms and signs of cervical radiculopathy of less than one month’s duration Interventions Treatment with a semi-hard collar and taking rest for three to six weeks; 12 twice weekly sessions of physiotherapy and home exercises for six weeks; or continuation of daily activities as much as possible without specific treatment (control group). Main outcome measures Time course of changes in pain scores for arm and neck pain on a 100 mm visual analogue scale and in the neck disability index during the first six weeks. Results In the wait and see group, arm pain diminished by 3 mm/week on the visual analogue scale (β=−3.1 mm, 95% confidence interval −4.0 to −2.2 mm) and by 19 mm in total over six weeks. Patients who were treated with cervical collar or physiotherapy achieved additional pain reduction (collar: β=−1.9 mm, −3.3 to −0.5 mm; physiotherapy: β=−1.9, −3.3 to −0.8), resulting in an extra pain reduction compared with the control group of 12 mm after six weeks. In the wait and see group, neck pain did not decrease significantly in the first six weeks (β=−0.9 mm, −2.0 to 0.3). Treatment with the collar resulted in a weekly reduction on the visual analogue scale of 2.8 mm (−4.2 to −1.3), amounting to 17 mm in six weeks, whereas physiotherapy gave a weekly reduction of 2.4 mm (−3.9 to −0.8) resulting in a decrease of 14 mm after six weeks. Compared with a wait and see policy, the neck disability index showed a significant change with the use of the collar and rest (β=−0.9 mm, −1.6 to −0.1) and a non-significant effect with physiotherapy and home exercises. Conclusion A semi-hard cervical collar and rest for three to six weeks or physiotherapy accompanied by home exercises for six weeks reduced neck and arm pain substantially compared with a wait and see policy in the early phase of cervical radiculopathy. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00129714.
format Text
id pubmed-2758937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27589372009-12-30 Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial Kuijper, Barbara Tans, Jos Th J Beelen, Anita Nollet, Frans de Visser, Marianne BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with collar or physiotherapy compared with a wait and see policy in recent onset cervical radiculopathy. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Neurology outpatient clinics in three Dutch hospitals. Participants 205 patients with symptoms and signs of cervical radiculopathy of less than one month’s duration Interventions Treatment with a semi-hard collar and taking rest for three to six weeks; 12 twice weekly sessions of physiotherapy and home exercises for six weeks; or continuation of daily activities as much as possible without specific treatment (control group). Main outcome measures Time course of changes in pain scores for arm and neck pain on a 100 mm visual analogue scale and in the neck disability index during the first six weeks. Results In the wait and see group, arm pain diminished by 3 mm/week on the visual analogue scale (β=−3.1 mm, 95% confidence interval −4.0 to −2.2 mm) and by 19 mm in total over six weeks. Patients who were treated with cervical collar or physiotherapy achieved additional pain reduction (collar: β=−1.9 mm, −3.3 to −0.5 mm; physiotherapy: β=−1.9, −3.3 to −0.8), resulting in an extra pain reduction compared with the control group of 12 mm after six weeks. In the wait and see group, neck pain did not decrease significantly in the first six weeks (β=−0.9 mm, −2.0 to 0.3). Treatment with the collar resulted in a weekly reduction on the visual analogue scale of 2.8 mm (−4.2 to −1.3), amounting to 17 mm in six weeks, whereas physiotherapy gave a weekly reduction of 2.4 mm (−3.9 to −0.8) resulting in a decrease of 14 mm after six weeks. Compared with a wait and see policy, the neck disability index showed a significant change with the use of the collar and rest (β=−0.9 mm, −1.6 to −0.1) and a non-significant effect with physiotherapy and home exercises. Conclusion A semi-hard cervical collar and rest for three to six weeks or physiotherapy accompanied by home exercises for six weeks reduced neck and arm pain substantially compared with a wait and see policy in the early phase of cervical radiculopathy. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00129714. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2758937/ /pubmed/19812130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3883 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Kuijper, Barbara
Tans, Jos Th J
Beelen, Anita
Nollet, Frans
de Visser, Marianne
Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
title Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
title_full Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
title_fullStr Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
title_short Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
title_sort cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2758937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19812130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3883
work_keys_str_mv AT kuijperbarbara cervicalcollarorphysiotherapyversuswaitandseepolicyforrecentonsetcervicalradiculopathyrandomisedtrial
AT tansjosthj cervicalcollarorphysiotherapyversuswaitandseepolicyforrecentonsetcervicalradiculopathyrandomisedtrial
AT beelenanita cervicalcollarorphysiotherapyversuswaitandseepolicyforrecentonsetcervicalradiculopathyrandomisedtrial
AT nolletfrans cervicalcollarorphysiotherapyversuswaitandseepolicyforrecentonsetcervicalradiculopathyrandomisedtrial
AT devissermarianne cervicalcollarorphysiotherapyversuswaitandseepolicyforrecentonsetcervicalradiculopathyrandomisedtrial