Cargando…
Checklists to improve the quality of the orthopaedic literature
Several checklists have been developed in an effort to help journals and researchers improve the quality of reporting in research. The CONSORT statement and the CLEAR NPT evaluate randomized trials. The MOOSE and QUOROM checklists evaluate meta-analyses. The STROBE checklists assists readers in eval...
Autores principales: | Mundi, Raman, Chaudhry, Harman, Singh, Ishu, Bhandari, Mohit |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826520 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.40251 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How good is the orthopaedic literature?
por: Chaudhry, Harman, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Fracture healing
por: Mundi, Raman, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Evidence-based orthopaedics: A brief history
por: Hoppe, Daniel J, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Multicenter collaborative for orthopaedic research in India: An opportunity for global leadership
por: Mathew, George, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Design and execution of clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery
por: Mundi, R., et al.
Publicado: (2014)