Cargando…
Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center
BACKGROUND: Despite variations in technique, the results of primary and revision lumbar discectomy have been good. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review cases of primary and revision lumbar discectomy performed in our institute over a three-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826524 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.40254 |
_version_ | 1782172695614455808 |
---|---|
author | Acharya, KN Nathan, TS Senthil Kumar, J Renjit Menon, K Venugopal |
author_facet | Acharya, KN Nathan, TS Senthil Kumar, J Renjit Menon, K Venugopal |
author_sort | Acharya, KN |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite variations in technique, the results of primary and revision lumbar discectomy have been good. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review cases of primary and revision lumbar discectomy performed in our institute over a three-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case records of 273 patients who underwent lumbar discectomy between January 2001-2004 and fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed. Of these, 259 were primary discectomies and 14 were revision surgeries. Recurrence was defined as ipsilateral disc herniation at the previously operated level. Demographic parameters, magnetic resonance imaging of the disc, patient satisfaction and rate of recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: The primary surgery group had 52 (20.08%) contained and 207 (79.92%) extruded or sequestered discs, while the numbers in the revision group were three (21.43%) and 11 (78.57%) respectively. “Satisfactory” outcome was noted in 96.5% of the primary surgeries, with a recurrence rate of 3.5%. In the revision group 78.6% had “satisfactory” outcome. In 9.4% of the primary group we encountered complications, while it was 21.43% in the revision group. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar discectomy is a safe, simple and effective procedure with satisfactory outcome in 96.5% of primary disc surgery and 78.6% of revision disc surgery. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2759631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27596312009-10-13 Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center Acharya, KN Nathan, TS Senthil Kumar, J Renjit Menon, K Venugopal Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite variations in technique, the results of primary and revision lumbar discectomy have been good. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review cases of primary and revision lumbar discectomy performed in our institute over a three-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case records of 273 patients who underwent lumbar discectomy between January 2001-2004 and fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed. Of these, 259 were primary discectomies and 14 were revision surgeries. Recurrence was defined as ipsilateral disc herniation at the previously operated level. Demographic parameters, magnetic resonance imaging of the disc, patient satisfaction and rate of recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: The primary surgery group had 52 (20.08%) contained and 207 (79.92%) extruded or sequestered discs, while the numbers in the revision group were three (21.43%) and 11 (78.57%) respectively. “Satisfactory” outcome was noted in 96.5% of the primary surgeries, with a recurrence rate of 3.5%. In the revision group 78.6% had “satisfactory” outcome. In 9.4% of the primary group we encountered complications, while it was 21.43% in the revision group. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar discectomy is a safe, simple and effective procedure with satisfactory outcome in 96.5% of primary disc surgery and 78.6% of revision disc surgery. Medknow Publications 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2759631/ /pubmed/19826524 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.40254 Text en © Indian Journal of Psychiatry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Acharya, KN Nathan, TS Senthil Kumar, J Renjit Menon, K Venugopal Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center |
title | Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center |
title_full | Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center |
title_fullStr | Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center |
title_short | Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: A three-year review from one center |
title_sort | primary and revision lumbar discectomy: a three-year review from one center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826524 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.40254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acharyakn primaryandrevisionlumbardiscectomyathreeyearreviewfromonecenter AT nathantssenthil primaryandrevisionlumbardiscectomyathreeyearreviewfromonecenter AT kumarjrenjit primaryandrevisionlumbardiscectomyathreeyearreviewfromonecenter AT menonkvenugopal primaryandrevisionlumbardiscectomyathreeyearreviewfromonecenter |