Cargando…
Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
BACKGROUND: Recruiting to primary care studies is complex. With the current drive to increase numbers of patients involved in primary care studies, we need to know more about successful recruitment approaches. There is limited evidence on recruitment to focus group studies, particularly when no natu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-65 |
_version_ | 1782172712349728768 |
---|---|
author | Dyas, Jane V Apekey, Tanefa Tilling, Michelle Siriwardena, A Niroshan |
author_facet | Dyas, Jane V Apekey, Tanefa Tilling, Michelle Siriwardena, A Niroshan |
author_sort | Dyas, Jane V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruiting to primary care studies is complex. With the current drive to increase numbers of patients involved in primary care studies, we need to know more about successful recruitment approaches. There is limited evidence on recruitment to focus group studies, particularly when no natural grouping exists and where participants do not regularly meet. The aim of this paper is to reflect on recruitment to a focus group study comparing the methods used with existing evidence using a resource for research recruitment, PROSPeR (Planning Recruitment Options: Strategies for Primary Care). METHODS: The focus group formed part of modelling a complex intervention in primary care in the Resources for Effective Sleep Treatment (REST) study. Despite a considered approach at the design stage, there were a number of difficulties with recruitment. The recruitment strategy and subsequent revisions are detailed. RESULTS: The researchers' modifications to recruitment, justifications and evidence from the literature in support of them are presented. Contrary evidence is used to analyse why some aspects were unsuccessful and evidence is used to suggest improvements. Recruitment to focus group studies should be considered in two distinct phases; getting potential participants to contact the researcher, and converting those contacts into attendance. The difficulty of recruitment in primary care is underemphasised in the literature especially where people do not regularly come together, typified by this case study of patients with sleep problems. CONCLUSION: We recommend training GPs and nurses to recruit patients during consultations. Multiple recruitment methods should be employed from the outset and the need to build topic related non-financial incentives into the group meeting should be considered. Recruitment should be monitored regularly with barriers addressed iteratively as a study progresses. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2759948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27599482009-10-11 Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework Dyas, Jane V Apekey, Tanefa Tilling, Michelle Siriwardena, A Niroshan BMC Med Res Methodol Correspondence BACKGROUND: Recruiting to primary care studies is complex. With the current drive to increase numbers of patients involved in primary care studies, we need to know more about successful recruitment approaches. There is limited evidence on recruitment to focus group studies, particularly when no natural grouping exists and where participants do not regularly meet. The aim of this paper is to reflect on recruitment to a focus group study comparing the methods used with existing evidence using a resource for research recruitment, PROSPeR (Planning Recruitment Options: Strategies for Primary Care). METHODS: The focus group formed part of modelling a complex intervention in primary care in the Resources for Effective Sleep Treatment (REST) study. Despite a considered approach at the design stage, there were a number of difficulties with recruitment. The recruitment strategy and subsequent revisions are detailed. RESULTS: The researchers' modifications to recruitment, justifications and evidence from the literature in support of them are presented. Contrary evidence is used to analyse why some aspects were unsuccessful and evidence is used to suggest improvements. Recruitment to focus group studies should be considered in two distinct phases; getting potential participants to contact the researcher, and converting those contacts into attendance. The difficulty of recruitment in primary care is underemphasised in the literature especially where people do not regularly come together, typified by this case study of patients with sleep problems. CONCLUSION: We recommend training GPs and nurses to recruit patients during consultations. Multiple recruitment methods should be employed from the outset and the need to build topic related non-financial incentives into the group meeting should be considered. Recruitment should be monitored regularly with barriers addressed iteratively as a study progresses. BioMed Central 2009-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2759948/ /pubmed/19772603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-65 Text en Copyright ©2009 Dyas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Dyas, Jane V Apekey, Tanefa Tilling, Michelle Siriwardena, A Niroshan Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
title | Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
title_full | Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
title_fullStr | Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
title_short | Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
title_sort | strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dyasjanev strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework AT apekeytanefa strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework AT tillingmichelle strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework AT siriwardenaaniroshan strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework |