Cargando…

Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework

BACKGROUND: Recruiting to primary care studies is complex. With the current drive to increase numbers of patients involved in primary care studies, we need to know more about successful recruitment approaches. There is limited evidence on recruitment to focus group studies, particularly when no natu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyas, Jane V, Apekey, Tanefa, Tilling, Michelle, Siriwardena, A Niroshan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-65
_version_ 1782172712349728768
author Dyas, Jane V
Apekey, Tanefa
Tilling, Michelle
Siriwardena, A Niroshan
author_facet Dyas, Jane V
Apekey, Tanefa
Tilling, Michelle
Siriwardena, A Niroshan
author_sort Dyas, Jane V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruiting to primary care studies is complex. With the current drive to increase numbers of patients involved in primary care studies, we need to know more about successful recruitment approaches. There is limited evidence on recruitment to focus group studies, particularly when no natural grouping exists and where participants do not regularly meet. The aim of this paper is to reflect on recruitment to a focus group study comparing the methods used with existing evidence using a resource for research recruitment, PROSPeR (Planning Recruitment Options: Strategies for Primary Care). METHODS: The focus group formed part of modelling a complex intervention in primary care in the Resources for Effective Sleep Treatment (REST) study. Despite a considered approach at the design stage, there were a number of difficulties with recruitment. The recruitment strategy and subsequent revisions are detailed. RESULTS: The researchers' modifications to recruitment, justifications and evidence from the literature in support of them are presented. Contrary evidence is used to analyse why some aspects were unsuccessful and evidence is used to suggest improvements. Recruitment to focus group studies should be considered in two distinct phases; getting potential participants to contact the researcher, and converting those contacts into attendance. The difficulty of recruitment in primary care is underemphasised in the literature especially where people do not regularly come together, typified by this case study of patients with sleep problems. CONCLUSION: We recommend training GPs and nurses to recruit patients during consultations. Multiple recruitment methods should be employed from the outset and the need to build topic related non-financial incentives into the group meeting should be considered. Recruitment should be monitored regularly with barriers addressed iteratively as a study progresses.
format Text
id pubmed-2759948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27599482009-10-11 Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework Dyas, Jane V Apekey, Tanefa Tilling, Michelle Siriwardena, A Niroshan BMC Med Res Methodol Correspondence BACKGROUND: Recruiting to primary care studies is complex. With the current drive to increase numbers of patients involved in primary care studies, we need to know more about successful recruitment approaches. There is limited evidence on recruitment to focus group studies, particularly when no natural grouping exists and where participants do not regularly meet. The aim of this paper is to reflect on recruitment to a focus group study comparing the methods used with existing evidence using a resource for research recruitment, PROSPeR (Planning Recruitment Options: Strategies for Primary Care). METHODS: The focus group formed part of modelling a complex intervention in primary care in the Resources for Effective Sleep Treatment (REST) study. Despite a considered approach at the design stage, there were a number of difficulties with recruitment. The recruitment strategy and subsequent revisions are detailed. RESULTS: The researchers' modifications to recruitment, justifications and evidence from the literature in support of them are presented. Contrary evidence is used to analyse why some aspects were unsuccessful and evidence is used to suggest improvements. Recruitment to focus group studies should be considered in two distinct phases; getting potential participants to contact the researcher, and converting those contacts into attendance. The difficulty of recruitment in primary care is underemphasised in the literature especially where people do not regularly come together, typified by this case study of patients with sleep problems. CONCLUSION: We recommend training GPs and nurses to recruit patients during consultations. Multiple recruitment methods should be employed from the outset and the need to build topic related non-financial incentives into the group meeting should be considered. Recruitment should be monitored regularly with barriers addressed iteratively as a study progresses. BioMed Central 2009-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2759948/ /pubmed/19772603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-65 Text en Copyright ©2009 Dyas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Dyas, Jane V
Apekey, Tanefa
Tilling, Michelle
Siriwardena, A Niroshan
Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
title Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
title_full Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
title_fullStr Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
title_short Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
title_sort strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-65
work_keys_str_mv AT dyasjanev strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework
AT apekeytanefa strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework
AT tillingmichelle strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework
AT siriwardenaaniroshan strategiesforimprovingpatientrecruitmenttofocusgroupsinprimarycareacasestudyreflectivepaperusingananalyticalframework