Cargando…

Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma

Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croner, Roland S., Lausen, Berthold, Schellerer, Vera, Zeittraeger, Isabel, Wein, Axel, Schildberg, Claus, Papadopoulos, Thomas, Dimmler, Arno, Hahn, Eckhart G., Hohenberger, Werner, Brueckl, Wolfgang M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/837170
_version_ 1782172736090537984
author Croner, Roland S.
Lausen, Berthold
Schellerer, Vera
Zeittraeger, Isabel
Wein, Axel
Schildberg, Claus
Papadopoulos, Thomas
Dimmler, Arno
Hahn, Eckhart G.
Hohenberger, Werner
Brueckl, Wolfgang M.
author_facet Croner, Roland S.
Lausen, Berthold
Schellerer, Vera
Zeittraeger, Isabel
Wein, Axel
Schildberg, Claus
Papadopoulos, Thomas
Dimmler, Arno
Hahn, Eckhart G.
Hohenberger, Werner
Brueckl, Wolfgang M.
author_sort Croner, Roland S.
collection PubMed
description Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is limited. In such cases the preamplification of RNA might be necessary prior to microarray hybridisation. To evaluate the comparability of microarray results generated either by amplified or non amplified RNA we isolated RNA from colorectal cancer samples (stage UICC IV) following tumour tissue enrichment by macroscopic manual dissection (CMD). One part of the RNA was directly labelled and hybridised to GeneChips (HG-U133A, Affymetrix), the other part of the RNA was amplified according to the “Eberwine” protocol and was then hybridised to the microarrays. During unsupervised hierarchical clustering the samples were divided in groups regarding the RNA pre-treatment and 5.726 differentially expressed genes were identified. Using independent microarray data of 31 amplified vs. 24 non amplified RNA samples from colon carcinomas (stage UICC III) in a set of 50 predictive genes we validated the amplification bias. In conclusion microarray data resulting from different pre-processing regarding RNA pre-amplification can not be compared within one analysis.
format Text
id pubmed-2760353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27603532009-10-13 Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma Croner, Roland S. Lausen, Berthold Schellerer, Vera Zeittraeger, Isabel Wein, Axel Schildberg, Claus Papadopoulos, Thomas Dimmler, Arno Hahn, Eckhart G. Hohenberger, Werner Brueckl, Wolfgang M. J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is limited. In such cases the preamplification of RNA might be necessary prior to microarray hybridisation. To evaluate the comparability of microarray results generated either by amplified or non amplified RNA we isolated RNA from colorectal cancer samples (stage UICC IV) following tumour tissue enrichment by macroscopic manual dissection (CMD). One part of the RNA was directly labelled and hybridised to GeneChips (HG-U133A, Affymetrix), the other part of the RNA was amplified according to the “Eberwine” protocol and was then hybridised to the microarrays. During unsupervised hierarchical clustering the samples were divided in groups regarding the RNA pre-treatment and 5.726 differentially expressed genes were identified. Using independent microarray data of 31 amplified vs. 24 non amplified RNA samples from colon carcinomas (stage UICC III) in a set of 50 predictive genes we validated the amplification bias. In conclusion microarray data resulting from different pre-processing regarding RNA pre-amplification can not be compared within one analysis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2009 2009-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2760353/ /pubmed/19826639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/837170 Text en Copyright © 2009 Roland S. Croner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Croner, Roland S.
Lausen, Berthold
Schellerer, Vera
Zeittraeger, Isabel
Wein, Axel
Schildberg, Claus
Papadopoulos, Thomas
Dimmler, Arno
Hahn, Eckhart G.
Hohenberger, Werner
Brueckl, Wolfgang M.
Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
title Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_full Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_short Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
title_sort comparability of microarray data between amplified and non amplified rna in colorectal carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/837170
work_keys_str_mv AT cronerrolands comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT lausenberthold comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT schellerervera comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT zeittraegerisabel comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT weinaxel comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT schildbergclaus comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT papadopoulosthomas comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT dimmlerarno comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT hahneckhartg comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT hohenbergerwerner comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma
AT bruecklwolfgangm comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma