Cargando…
Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma
Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/837170 |
_version_ | 1782172736090537984 |
---|---|
author | Croner, Roland S. Lausen, Berthold Schellerer, Vera Zeittraeger, Isabel Wein, Axel Schildberg, Claus Papadopoulos, Thomas Dimmler, Arno Hahn, Eckhart G. Hohenberger, Werner Brueckl, Wolfgang M. |
author_facet | Croner, Roland S. Lausen, Berthold Schellerer, Vera Zeittraeger, Isabel Wein, Axel Schildberg, Claus Papadopoulos, Thomas Dimmler, Arno Hahn, Eckhart G. Hohenberger, Werner Brueckl, Wolfgang M. |
author_sort | Croner, Roland S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is limited. In such cases the preamplification of RNA might be necessary prior to microarray hybridisation. To evaluate the comparability of microarray results generated either by amplified or non amplified RNA we isolated RNA from colorectal cancer samples (stage UICC IV) following tumour tissue enrichment by macroscopic manual dissection (CMD). One part of the RNA was directly labelled and hybridised to GeneChips (HG-U133A, Affymetrix), the other part of the RNA was amplified according to the “Eberwine” protocol and was then hybridised to the microarrays. During unsupervised hierarchical clustering the samples were divided in groups regarding the RNA pre-treatment and 5.726 differentially expressed genes were identified. Using independent microarray data of 31 amplified vs. 24 non amplified RNA samples from colon carcinomas (stage UICC III) in a set of 50 predictive genes we validated the amplification bias. In conclusion microarray data resulting from different pre-processing regarding RNA pre-amplification can not be compared within one analysis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2760353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27603532009-10-13 Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma Croner, Roland S. Lausen, Berthold Schellerer, Vera Zeittraeger, Isabel Wein, Axel Schildberg, Claus Papadopoulos, Thomas Dimmler, Arno Hahn, Eckhart G. Hohenberger, Werner Brueckl, Wolfgang M. J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is limited. In such cases the preamplification of RNA might be necessary prior to microarray hybridisation. To evaluate the comparability of microarray results generated either by amplified or non amplified RNA we isolated RNA from colorectal cancer samples (stage UICC IV) following tumour tissue enrichment by macroscopic manual dissection (CMD). One part of the RNA was directly labelled and hybridised to GeneChips (HG-U133A, Affymetrix), the other part of the RNA was amplified according to the “Eberwine” protocol and was then hybridised to the microarrays. During unsupervised hierarchical clustering the samples were divided in groups regarding the RNA pre-treatment and 5.726 differentially expressed genes were identified. Using independent microarray data of 31 amplified vs. 24 non amplified RNA samples from colon carcinomas (stage UICC III) in a set of 50 predictive genes we validated the amplification bias. In conclusion microarray data resulting from different pre-processing regarding RNA pre-amplification can not be compared within one analysis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2009 2009-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2760353/ /pubmed/19826639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/837170 Text en Copyright © 2009 Roland S. Croner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Croner, Roland S. Lausen, Berthold Schellerer, Vera Zeittraeger, Isabel Wein, Axel Schildberg, Claus Papadopoulos, Thomas Dimmler, Arno Hahn, Eckhart G. Hohenberger, Werner Brueckl, Wolfgang M. Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title | Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_full | Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_short | Comparability of Microarray Data between Amplified and Non Amplified RNA in Colorectal Carcinoma |
title_sort | comparability of microarray data between amplified and non amplified rna in colorectal carcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/837170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cronerrolands comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT lausenberthold comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT schellerervera comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT zeittraegerisabel comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT weinaxel comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT schildbergclaus comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT papadopoulosthomas comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT dimmlerarno comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT hahneckhartg comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT hohenbergerwerner comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma AT bruecklwolfgangm comparabilityofmicroarraydatabetweenamplifiedandnonamplifiedrnaincolorectalcarcinoma |