Cargando…
Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0
Sequence simulation is an important tool in validating biological hypotheses as well as testing various bioinformatics and molecular evolutionary methods. Hypothesis testing relies on the representational ability of the sequence simulation method. Simple hypotheses are testable through simulation of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp174 |
_version_ | 1782172742373605376 |
---|---|
author | Strope, Cory L. Abel, Kevin Scott, Stephen D. Moriyama, Etsuko N. |
author_facet | Strope, Cory L. Abel, Kevin Scott, Stephen D. Moriyama, Etsuko N. |
author_sort | Strope, Cory L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sequence simulation is an important tool in validating biological hypotheses as well as testing various bioinformatics and molecular evolutionary methods. Hypothesis testing relies on the representational ability of the sequence simulation method. Simple hypotheses are testable through simulation of random, homogeneously evolving sequence sets. However, testing complex hypotheses, for example, local similarities, requires simulation of sequence evolution under heterogeneous models. To this end, we previously introduced indel-Seq-Gen version 1.0 (iSGv1.0; indel, insertion/deletion). iSGv1.0 allowed heterogeneous protein evolution and motif conservation as well as insertion and deletion constraints in subsequences. Despite these advances, for complex hypothesis testing, neither iSGv1.0 nor other currently available sequence simulation methods is sufficient. indel-Seq-Gen version 2.0 (iSGv2.0) aims at simulating evolution of highly divergent DNA sequences and protein superfamilies. iSGv2.0 improves upon iSGv1.0 through the addition of lineage-specific evolution, motif conservation using PROSITE-like regular expressions, indel tracking, subsequence-length constraints, as well as coding and noncoding DNA evolution. Furthermore, we formalize the sequence representation used for iSGv2.0 and uncover a flaw in the modeling of indels used in current state of the art methods, which biases simulation results for hypotheses involving indels. We fix this flaw in iSGv2.0 by using a novel discrete stepping procedure. Finally, we present an example simulation of the calycin-superfamily sequences and compare the performance of iSGv2.0 with iSGv1.0 and random model of sequence evolution. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2760465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27604652009-10-13 Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 Strope, Cory L. Abel, Kevin Scott, Stephen D. Moriyama, Etsuko N. Mol Biol Evol Research Articles Sequence simulation is an important tool in validating biological hypotheses as well as testing various bioinformatics and molecular evolutionary methods. Hypothesis testing relies on the representational ability of the sequence simulation method. Simple hypotheses are testable through simulation of random, homogeneously evolving sequence sets. However, testing complex hypotheses, for example, local similarities, requires simulation of sequence evolution under heterogeneous models. To this end, we previously introduced indel-Seq-Gen version 1.0 (iSGv1.0; indel, insertion/deletion). iSGv1.0 allowed heterogeneous protein evolution and motif conservation as well as insertion and deletion constraints in subsequences. Despite these advances, for complex hypothesis testing, neither iSGv1.0 nor other currently available sequence simulation methods is sufficient. indel-Seq-Gen version 2.0 (iSGv2.0) aims at simulating evolution of highly divergent DNA sequences and protein superfamilies. iSGv2.0 improves upon iSGv1.0 through the addition of lineage-specific evolution, motif conservation using PROSITE-like regular expressions, indel tracking, subsequence-length constraints, as well as coding and noncoding DNA evolution. Furthermore, we formalize the sequence representation used for iSGv2.0 and uncover a flaw in the modeling of indels used in current state of the art methods, which biases simulation results for hypotheses involving indels. We fix this flaw in iSGv2.0 by using a novel discrete stepping procedure. Finally, we present an example simulation of the calycin-superfamily sequences and compare the performance of iSGv2.0 with iSGv1.0 and random model of sequence evolution. Oxford University Press 2009-11 2009-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2760465/ /pubmed/19651852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp174 Text en © 2009 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Strope, Cory L. Abel, Kevin Scott, Stephen D. Moriyama, Etsuko N. Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 |
title | Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 |
title_full | Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 |
title_fullStr | Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 |
title_short | Biological Sequence Simulation for Testing Complex Evolutionary Hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen Version 2.0 |
title_sort | biological sequence simulation for testing complex evolutionary hypotheses: indel-seq-gen version 2.0 |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19651852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stropecoryl biologicalsequencesimulationfortestingcomplexevolutionaryhypothesesindelseqgenversion20 AT abelkevin biologicalsequencesimulationfortestingcomplexevolutionaryhypothesesindelseqgenversion20 AT scottstephend biologicalsequencesimulationfortestingcomplexevolutionaryhypothesesindelseqgenversion20 AT moriyamaetsukon biologicalsequencesimulationfortestingcomplexevolutionaryhypothesesindelseqgenversion20 |