Cargando…
Incorporating multiple interventions in meta-analysis: an evaluation of the mixed treatment comparison with the adjusted indirect comparison
BACKGROUND: Comparing the effectiveness of interventions is now a requirement for regulatory approval in several countries. It also aids in clinical and public health decision-making. However, in the absence of head-to-head randomized trials (RCTs), determining the relative effectiveness of interven...
Autores principales: | O'Regan, Christopher, Ghement, Isabella, Eyawo, Oghenowede, Guyatt, Gordon H, Mills, Edward J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-86 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Estimating the Power of Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study
por: Mills, Edward J., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Pharmacotherapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
por: Mills, Edward J, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Metastatic renal cell cancer treatments: An indirect comparison meta-analysis
por: Mills, Edward J, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: a step forward into complexity
por: Mills, Edward J, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Traditional Chinese medicines in the treatment of hepatocellular cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wu, Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2009)