Cargando…

A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial

BACKGROUND: The development of suture hole bleeding at peripheral arterial bypass anastomoses using PTFE graft prostheses is a common problem in peripheral vascular surgery. Traditionally the problem is managed by compression with surgical swabs and reversal heparin or by using several haemostatic d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumann, Petra, Schumacher, Hardy, Hüsing, Johannes, Luntz, Steffen, Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19788736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-91
_version_ 1782172753641603072
author Baumann, Petra
Schumacher, Hardy
Hüsing, Johannes
Luntz, Steffen
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
author_facet Baumann, Petra
Schumacher, Hardy
Hüsing, Johannes
Luntz, Steffen
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
author_sort Baumann, Petra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of suture hole bleeding at peripheral arterial bypass anastomoses using PTFE graft prostheses is a common problem in peripheral vascular surgery. Traditionally the problem is managed by compression with surgical swabs and reversal heparin or by using several haemostatic device (e.g. different forms of collagen, oxidized cellulose, gelatine sponge, ethylcyanoacrylate glue or fibrin) with various success. Preclinical data suggest that the haemostatic effect of collagen is stronger than that of oxidized cellulose, but no direct clinical comparison of their hemostatic performance has been published so far. DESIGN: This randomized, controlled, prospective trial evaluates the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis. 28 patients undergoing an elective peripheral vascular reconstruction due to peripheral vascular disease will be included. Suture hole bleeding occurring at the arterial bypass anastomosis using a PTFE prostheses will be stopped by the application of Lyostypt and/or Surgicel. The proximal anastomoses will be randomized intraoperatively. The patients will be allocated into 4 different treatment groups. Group1 Lyostypt distal/Surgicel proximal; Group 2: Lyostypt proximal/Surgicel distal; Group 3: Surgicel distal and proximal; Group 4: Lyostypt distal and proximal. Primary endpoint of the study is time to haemostasis. Secondary endpoints are the number of intraoperatively used haemostatic devices, postoperative mortality within 30 days as well as the intraoperative efficacy rating of the two devices evaluated by the surgeon. As a safety secondary parameter, the local and general complication occurring till 30 ± 10 days postoperatively will also be analysed. After hospital discharge the investigator will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days after surgery. DISCUSSION: The COBBANA trial aims to assess, whether the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt is superior to Surgicel in suture hole bleedings of arterial bypass anastomoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00837954
format Text
id pubmed-2760543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27605432009-10-13 A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial Baumann, Petra Schumacher, Hardy Hüsing, Johannes Luntz, Steffen Knaebel, Hanns-Peter Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The development of suture hole bleeding at peripheral arterial bypass anastomoses using PTFE graft prostheses is a common problem in peripheral vascular surgery. Traditionally the problem is managed by compression with surgical swabs and reversal heparin or by using several haemostatic device (e.g. different forms of collagen, oxidized cellulose, gelatine sponge, ethylcyanoacrylate glue or fibrin) with various success. Preclinical data suggest that the haemostatic effect of collagen is stronger than that of oxidized cellulose, but no direct clinical comparison of their hemostatic performance has been published so far. DESIGN: This randomized, controlled, prospective trial evaluates the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis. 28 patients undergoing an elective peripheral vascular reconstruction due to peripheral vascular disease will be included. Suture hole bleeding occurring at the arterial bypass anastomosis using a PTFE prostheses will be stopped by the application of Lyostypt and/or Surgicel. The proximal anastomoses will be randomized intraoperatively. The patients will be allocated into 4 different treatment groups. Group1 Lyostypt distal/Surgicel proximal; Group 2: Lyostypt proximal/Surgicel distal; Group 3: Surgicel distal and proximal; Group 4: Lyostypt distal and proximal. Primary endpoint of the study is time to haemostasis. Secondary endpoints are the number of intraoperatively used haemostatic devices, postoperative mortality within 30 days as well as the intraoperative efficacy rating of the two devices evaluated by the surgeon. As a safety secondary parameter, the local and general complication occurring till 30 ± 10 days postoperatively will also be analysed. After hospital discharge the investigator will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days after surgery. DISCUSSION: The COBBANA trial aims to assess, whether the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt is superior to Surgicel in suture hole bleedings of arterial bypass anastomoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00837954 BioMed Central 2009-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2760543/ /pubmed/19788736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-91 Text en Copyright © 2009 Baumann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Baumann, Petra
Schumacher, Hardy
Hüsing, Johannes
Luntz, Steffen
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial
title A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial
title_full A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial
title_fullStr A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial
title_short A randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of Lyostypt versus Surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "COBBANA" trial
title_sort randomized, controlled, prospective trial to evaluate the haemostatic effect of lyostypt versus surgicel in arterial bypass anastomosis: "cobbana" trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19788736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-91
work_keys_str_mv AT baumannpetra arandomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT schumacherhardy arandomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT husingjohannes arandomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT luntzsteffen arandomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT knaebelhannspeter arandomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT baumannpetra randomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT schumacherhardy randomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT husingjohannes randomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT luntzsteffen randomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial
AT knaebelhannspeter randomizedcontrolledprospectivetrialtoevaluatethehaemostaticeffectoflyostyptversussurgicelinarterialbypassanastomosiscobbanatrial