Cargando…

Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common feature in patients with chronic kidney disease. Its serious clinical consequences include renal osteodystrophy, calcific uremic arteriolopathy, and vascular calcifications that increase morbidity and mortality. Reduced synthesis of active vitami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Ditte, Brandi, Lisbet, Rasmussen, Knud
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19778452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-28
_version_ 1782172754593710080
author Hansen, Ditte
Brandi, Lisbet
Rasmussen, Knud
author_facet Hansen, Ditte
Brandi, Lisbet
Rasmussen, Knud
author_sort Hansen, Ditte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common feature in patients with chronic kidney disease. Its serious clinical consequences include renal osteodystrophy, calcific uremic arteriolopathy, and vascular calcifications that increase morbidity and mortality. Reduced synthesis of active vitamin D contributes to secondary hyperparathyroidism. Therefore, this condition is managed with activated vitamin D. However, hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia limit the use of activated vitamin D. In Denmark alfacalcidol is the primary choice of vitamin D analog. A new vitamin D analog, paricalcitol, may be less prone to induce hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. However, a randomised controlled clinical study comparing alfacalcidol and paricalcitol has never been performed. The primary objective of this study is to compare alfacalcidol and paricalcitol. We evaluate the suppression of the secondary hyperparathyroidism and the tendency towards hyperphosphatemia and hypercalcemia. METHODS/DESIGN: This is an investigator-initiated cross-over study. Nine Danish haemodialysis units will recruit 117 patients with end stage renal failure on maintenance haemodialysis therapy. Patients are randomised into two treatment arms. After a wash out period of 6 weeks they receive increasing doses of alfacalcidol or paricalcitol for a period of 16 weeks and after a further wash out period of 6 weeks they receive the contrary treatment (paricalcitol or alfacalcidol) for 16 weeks. DISCUSSION: Hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. If there is any difference in the ability of these two vitamin D analogs to decrease the secondary hyperparathyroidism without causing hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, there may also be a difference in the risk of cardiovascular mortality depending on which vitamin D analog that are used. This has potential major importance for this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT004695
format Text
id pubmed-2760547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27605472009-10-13 Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol Hansen, Ditte Brandi, Lisbet Rasmussen, Knud BMC Nephrol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common feature in patients with chronic kidney disease. Its serious clinical consequences include renal osteodystrophy, calcific uremic arteriolopathy, and vascular calcifications that increase morbidity and mortality. Reduced synthesis of active vitamin D contributes to secondary hyperparathyroidism. Therefore, this condition is managed with activated vitamin D. However, hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia limit the use of activated vitamin D. In Denmark alfacalcidol is the primary choice of vitamin D analog. A new vitamin D analog, paricalcitol, may be less prone to induce hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. However, a randomised controlled clinical study comparing alfacalcidol and paricalcitol has never been performed. The primary objective of this study is to compare alfacalcidol and paricalcitol. We evaluate the suppression of the secondary hyperparathyroidism and the tendency towards hyperphosphatemia and hypercalcemia. METHODS/DESIGN: This is an investigator-initiated cross-over study. Nine Danish haemodialysis units will recruit 117 patients with end stage renal failure on maintenance haemodialysis therapy. Patients are randomised into two treatment arms. After a wash out period of 6 weeks they receive increasing doses of alfacalcidol or paricalcitol for a period of 16 weeks and after a further wash out period of 6 weeks they receive the contrary treatment (paricalcitol or alfacalcidol) for 16 weeks. DISCUSSION: Hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. If there is any difference in the ability of these two vitamin D analogs to decrease the secondary hyperparathyroidism without causing hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, there may also be a difference in the risk of cardiovascular mortality depending on which vitamin D analog that are used. This has potential major importance for this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT004695 BioMed Central 2009-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2760547/ /pubmed/19778452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-28 Text en Copyright ©2009 Hansen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hansen, Ditte
Brandi, Lisbet
Rasmussen, Knud
Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
title Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
title_full Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
title_fullStr Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
title_short Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
title_sort treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial comparing paricalcitol and alfacalcidol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19778452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-10-28
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenditte treatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminhaemodialysispatientsarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingparicalcitolandalfacalcidol
AT brandilisbet treatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminhaemodialysispatientsarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingparicalcitolandalfacalcidol
AT rasmussenknud treatmentofsecondaryhyperparathyroidisminhaemodialysispatientsarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingparicalcitolandalfacalcidol