Cargando…
Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module
BACKGROUND: The availability of alternative sources of information, e. g. the internet, may influence the quantity and quality of information cancer patients receive regarding their disease and treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of information in cancer patients dur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-40 |
_version_ | 1782172758381166592 |
---|---|
author | Adler, Johannes Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne Jahn, Patrick Landenberger, Margarete Leplow, Bernd Vordermark, Dirk |
author_facet | Adler, Johannes Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne Jahn, Patrick Landenberger, Margarete Leplow, Bernd Vordermark, Dirk |
author_sort | Adler, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The availability of alternative sources of information, e. g. the internet, may influence the quantity and quality of information cancer patients receive regarding their disease and treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of information in cancer patients during radiotherapy as well as media preferences and specifically the utilization of the internet. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, single-centre study 94 patients currently undergoing radiotherapy were asked to complete two questionnaires. The EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module was used to assess the quality and quantity of information received by patients in the areas disease, medical tests, treatment, other services, different places of care and how to help themselves, as well as qualitative aspects as helpfulness of and satisfaction with this information. The importance of different media, in particular the internet, was investigated by a nine-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was n = 72 patients (77%). Patients felt best informed concerning medical tests (mean ± SD score 79 ± 22, scale 0-100) followed by disease (68 ± 21). Treatment (52 ± 24) and different places of care and other services (30 ± 36 and 30 ± 30, respectively) ranked last. 37% of patients were very satisfied and 37% moderately satisfied with the amount of information received, 61% wished more information. Among eight media, brochures, television and internet were ranked as most important. 41% used the internet themselves or via friends or family, mostly for research of classic and alternative treatment options. Unavailability and the necessity of computer skills were most mentioned obstacles. CONCLUSION: In a single-center pilot study, radiotherapy patients indicated having received most information about medical tests and their disease. Patients very satisfied with their information had received the largest amount of information. Brochures, television and internet were the most important media. Individual patient needs should be considered in the development of novel information strategies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2760563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27605632009-10-13 Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module Adler, Johannes Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne Jahn, Patrick Landenberger, Margarete Leplow, Bernd Vordermark, Dirk Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The availability of alternative sources of information, e. g. the internet, may influence the quantity and quality of information cancer patients receive regarding their disease and treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of information in cancer patients during radiotherapy as well as media preferences and specifically the utilization of the internet. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, single-centre study 94 patients currently undergoing radiotherapy were asked to complete two questionnaires. The EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module was used to assess the quality and quantity of information received by patients in the areas disease, medical tests, treatment, other services, different places of care and how to help themselves, as well as qualitative aspects as helpfulness of and satisfaction with this information. The importance of different media, in particular the internet, was investigated by a nine-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was n = 72 patients (77%). Patients felt best informed concerning medical tests (mean ± SD score 79 ± 22, scale 0-100) followed by disease (68 ± 21). Treatment (52 ± 24) and different places of care and other services (30 ± 36 and 30 ± 30, respectively) ranked last. 37% of patients were very satisfied and 37% moderately satisfied with the amount of information received, 61% wished more information. Among eight media, brochures, television and internet were ranked as most important. 41% used the internet themselves or via friends or family, mostly for research of classic and alternative treatment options. Unavailability and the necessity of computer skills were most mentioned obstacles. CONCLUSION: In a single-center pilot study, radiotherapy patients indicated having received most information about medical tests and their disease. Patients very satisfied with their information had received the largest amount of information. Brochures, television and internet were the most important media. Individual patient needs should be considered in the development of novel information strategies. BioMed Central 2009-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2760563/ /pubmed/19785759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-40 Text en Copyright © 2009 Adler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Adler, Johannes Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne Jahn, Patrick Landenberger, Margarete Leplow, Bernd Vordermark, Dirk Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module |
title | Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module |
title_full | Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module |
title_fullStr | Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module |
title_short | Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module |
title_sort | patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the eortc qlq-info26 module |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adlerjohannes patientinformationinradiationoncologyacrosssectionalpilotstudyusingtheeortcqlqinfo26module AT paeleckehabermannyvonne patientinformationinradiationoncologyacrosssectionalpilotstudyusingtheeortcqlqinfo26module AT jahnpatrick patientinformationinradiationoncologyacrosssectionalpilotstudyusingtheeortcqlqinfo26module AT landenbergermargarete patientinformationinradiationoncologyacrosssectionalpilotstudyusingtheeortcqlqinfo26module AT leplowbernd patientinformationinradiationoncologyacrosssectionalpilotstudyusingtheeortcqlqinfo26module AT vordermarkdirk patientinformationinradiationoncologyacrosssectionalpilotstudyusingtheeortcqlqinfo26module |