Cargando…

Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the water absorption and the amount of hydroxyethyl metacrylate (HEMA) level released from various resin modified glass ionomer cements. METHODS: Advance, Vitremer and Protec-Cem resin modified glass ionomer cements were used to evaluate the HEMA rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beriat, Nilufer Celebi, Nalbant, Dilek
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826597
_version_ 1782172803535994880
author Beriat, Nilufer Celebi
Nalbant, Dilek
author_facet Beriat, Nilufer Celebi
Nalbant, Dilek
author_sort Beriat, Nilufer Celebi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the water absorption and the amount of hydroxyethyl metacrylate (HEMA) level released from various resin modified glass ionomer cements. METHODS: Advance, Vitremer and Protec-Cem resin modified glass ionomer cements were used to evaluate the HEMA release. Ten specimens were fabricated from each cement in 10 x 1 mm height. Thirty specimens were immersed in glass containers filled with 20 ml deionized water. 1 ml solution was taken from the container at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 24 hour and 7 days intervals from each group and analyzed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) machine and the results are presented in ppm. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests at a 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: At all time intervals Vitremer showed highest HEMA release ( 10 min: 54.2 ppm; 1 h: 86.8 ppm; 24 h: 93.4 ppm) (P=0.0001). At the end of 10 minutes and first hour, following Vitremer, HEMA release was highest for Protec-Cem (10 min: 14.8 ppm; 1 h: 23.6 ppm) and then Advance (10 min: 5.5 ppm; 1 h: 18.8 ppm) (P<.05). Water absorption tests were performed according to the specifications of ISO 4049. Water absorption was highest for Vitremer and lowest for the Protec-Cem and the difference among cement groups was significant (P<.005). CONCLUSIONS: Vitremer showed the highest HEMA release and water absorption values and Protec-Cem showed the lowest values. HEMA release by time was significant for Advance cement. This release may be relevant both to the risk of adverse pulpal responses in patients and to the risk of allergy in patients and dental personnel.
format Text
id pubmed-2761156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dental Investigations Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27611562009-10-13 Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers Beriat, Nilufer Celebi Nalbant, Dilek Eur J Dent Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the water absorption and the amount of hydroxyethyl metacrylate (HEMA) level released from various resin modified glass ionomer cements. METHODS: Advance, Vitremer and Protec-Cem resin modified glass ionomer cements were used to evaluate the HEMA release. Ten specimens were fabricated from each cement in 10 x 1 mm height. Thirty specimens were immersed in glass containers filled with 20 ml deionized water. 1 ml solution was taken from the container at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 24 hour and 7 days intervals from each group and analyzed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) machine and the results are presented in ppm. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests at a 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: At all time intervals Vitremer showed highest HEMA release ( 10 min: 54.2 ppm; 1 h: 86.8 ppm; 24 h: 93.4 ppm) (P=0.0001). At the end of 10 minutes and first hour, following Vitremer, HEMA release was highest for Protec-Cem (10 min: 14.8 ppm; 1 h: 23.6 ppm) and then Advance (10 min: 5.5 ppm; 1 h: 18.8 ppm) (P<.05). Water absorption tests were performed according to the specifications of ISO 4049. Water absorption was highest for Vitremer and lowest for the Protec-Cem and the difference among cement groups was significant (P<.005). CONCLUSIONS: Vitremer showed the highest HEMA release and water absorption values and Protec-Cem showed the lowest values. HEMA release by time was significant for Advance cement. This release may be relevant both to the risk of adverse pulpal responses in patients and to the risk of allergy in patients and dental personnel. Dental Investigations Society 2009-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2761156/ /pubmed/19826597 Text en Copyright 2009 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Article
Beriat, Nilufer Celebi
Nalbant, Dilek
Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers
title Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers
title_full Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers
title_fullStr Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers
title_full_unstemmed Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers
title_short Water Absorption and HEMA Release of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomers
title_sort water absorption and hema release of resin-modified glass-ionomers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826597
work_keys_str_mv AT beriatnilufercelebi waterabsorptionandhemareleaseofresinmodifiedglassionomers
AT nalbantdilek waterabsorptionandhemareleaseofresinmodifiedglassionomers