Cargando…
Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of one-step adhesive systems to dry or moist dental substrate. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were sectioned into two halves, in the mesio-distal direction, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each half was embedded in a pol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Investigations Society
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826601 |
_version_ | 1782172804471324672 |
---|---|
author | Faria-e-Silva, André Luís Fabião, Mayra Melo Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini de Souza Meneses, Murilo Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas Soares, Paulo Vinícius Martins, Luís Roberto |
author_facet | Faria-e-Silva, André Luís Fabião, Mayra Melo Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini de Souza Meneses, Murilo Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas Soares, Paulo Vinícius Martins, Luís Roberto |
author_sort | Faria-e-Silva, André Luís |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of one-step adhesive systems to dry or moist dental substrate. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were sectioned into two halves, in the mesio-distal direction, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each half was embedded in a polystyrene resin cylinder so that the buccal/lingual surface remained exposed. This exposed surface was abraded to obtain both flat exposed enamel and dentin. The samples were randomly allocated according to the adhesive system (Xeno III, Adper Prompt and iBond) and moisture condition (dry and moist). The substrates were air-dried for 30 s for dry condition, while the moist substrates were re-wet with 2.5 μl of distilled water after drying. After the adhesive procedures, two resin composite cylinders were build-up on dentin and enamel substrates, totaling four per sample. A shear load was applied to the samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The evaluated one-step adhesives showed higher bond strength to dentin than enamel. The iBond presented better bond performance to moist substrate and Xeno III to dry substrate. The moisture condition did not interfere in the performance of Adper Prompt. The Xeno III and iBond presented higher bond strength than the other adhesives to both dry and moist substrates. CONCLUSIONS: The moisture condition of substrate interfered in the performance of one-step self-etching adhesives and the best moisture condition was material dependent. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2761160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Dental Investigations Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27611602009-10-13 Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions Faria-e-Silva, André Luís Fabião, Mayra Melo Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini de Souza Meneses, Murilo Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas Soares, Paulo Vinícius Martins, Luís Roberto Eur J Dent Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of one-step adhesive systems to dry or moist dental substrate. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were sectioned into two halves, in the mesio-distal direction, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each half was embedded in a polystyrene resin cylinder so that the buccal/lingual surface remained exposed. This exposed surface was abraded to obtain both flat exposed enamel and dentin. The samples were randomly allocated according to the adhesive system (Xeno III, Adper Prompt and iBond) and moisture condition (dry and moist). The substrates were air-dried for 30 s for dry condition, while the moist substrates were re-wet with 2.5 μl of distilled water after drying. After the adhesive procedures, two resin composite cylinders were build-up on dentin and enamel substrates, totaling four per sample. A shear load was applied to the samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The evaluated one-step adhesives showed higher bond strength to dentin than enamel. The iBond presented better bond performance to moist substrate and Xeno III to dry substrate. The moisture condition did not interfere in the performance of Adper Prompt. The Xeno III and iBond presented higher bond strength than the other adhesives to both dry and moist substrates. CONCLUSIONS: The moisture condition of substrate interfered in the performance of one-step self-etching adhesives and the best moisture condition was material dependent. Dental Investigations Society 2009-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2761160/ /pubmed/19826601 Text en Copyright 2009 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Article Faria-e-Silva, André Luís Fabião, Mayra Melo Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini de Souza Meneses, Murilo Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas Soares, Paulo Vinícius Martins, Luís Roberto Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions |
title | Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions |
title_full | Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions |
title_fullStr | Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions |
title_short | Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions |
title_sort | bond strength of one-step adhesives under different substrate moisture conditions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fariaesilvaandreluis bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions AT fabiaomayramelo bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions AT sfalcinravanaangelini bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions AT desouzamenesesmurilo bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions AT santosfilhopaulocesarfreitas bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions AT soarespaulovinicius bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions AT martinsluisroberto bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions |