Cargando…

Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of one-step adhesive systems to dry or moist dental substrate. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were sectioned into two halves, in the mesio-distal direction, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each half was embedded in a pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faria-e-Silva, André Luís, Fabião, Mayra Melo, Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini, de Souza Meneses, Murilo, Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas, Soares, Paulo Vinícius, Martins, Luís Roberto
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826601
_version_ 1782172804471324672
author Faria-e-Silva, André Luís
Fabião, Mayra Melo
Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini
de Souza Meneses, Murilo
Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas
Soares, Paulo Vinícius
Martins, Luís Roberto
author_facet Faria-e-Silva, André Luís
Fabião, Mayra Melo
Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini
de Souza Meneses, Murilo
Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas
Soares, Paulo Vinícius
Martins, Luís Roberto
author_sort Faria-e-Silva, André Luís
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of one-step adhesive systems to dry or moist dental substrate. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were sectioned into two halves, in the mesio-distal direction, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each half was embedded in a polystyrene resin cylinder so that the buccal/lingual surface remained exposed. This exposed surface was abraded to obtain both flat exposed enamel and dentin. The samples were randomly allocated according to the adhesive system (Xeno III, Adper Prompt and iBond) and moisture condition (dry and moist). The substrates were air-dried for 30 s for dry condition, while the moist substrates were re-wet with 2.5 μl of distilled water after drying. After the adhesive procedures, two resin composite cylinders were build-up on dentin and enamel substrates, totaling four per sample. A shear load was applied to the samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The evaluated one-step adhesives showed higher bond strength to dentin than enamel. The iBond presented better bond performance to moist substrate and Xeno III to dry substrate. The moisture condition did not interfere in the performance of Adper Prompt. The Xeno III and iBond presented higher bond strength than the other adhesives to both dry and moist substrates. CONCLUSIONS: The moisture condition of substrate interfered in the performance of one-step self-etching adhesives and the best moisture condition was material dependent.
format Text
id pubmed-2761160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dental Investigations Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27611602009-10-13 Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions Faria-e-Silva, André Luís Fabião, Mayra Melo Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini de Souza Meneses, Murilo Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas Soares, Paulo Vinícius Martins, Luís Roberto Eur J Dent Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of one-step adhesive systems to dry or moist dental substrate. METHODS: Thirty human third molars were sectioned into two halves, in the mesio-distal direction, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each half was embedded in a polystyrene resin cylinder so that the buccal/lingual surface remained exposed. This exposed surface was abraded to obtain both flat exposed enamel and dentin. The samples were randomly allocated according to the adhesive system (Xeno III, Adper Prompt and iBond) and moisture condition (dry and moist). The substrates were air-dried for 30 s for dry condition, while the moist substrates were re-wet with 2.5 μl of distilled water after drying. After the adhesive procedures, two resin composite cylinders were build-up on dentin and enamel substrates, totaling four per sample. A shear load was applied to the samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The evaluated one-step adhesives showed higher bond strength to dentin than enamel. The iBond presented better bond performance to moist substrate and Xeno III to dry substrate. The moisture condition did not interfere in the performance of Adper Prompt. The Xeno III and iBond presented higher bond strength than the other adhesives to both dry and moist substrates. CONCLUSIONS: The moisture condition of substrate interfered in the performance of one-step self-etching adhesives and the best moisture condition was material dependent. Dental Investigations Society 2009-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2761160/ /pubmed/19826601 Text en Copyright 2009 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Article
Faria-e-Silva, André Luís
Fabião, Mayra Melo
Sfalcin, Ravana Angelini
de Souza Meneses, Murilo
Santos-Filho, Paulo César Freitas
Soares, Paulo Vinícius
Martins, Luís Roberto
Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
title Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
title_full Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
title_fullStr Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
title_short Bond Strength of One-Step Adhesives under Different Substrate Moisture Conditions
title_sort bond strength of one-step adhesives under different substrate moisture conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826601
work_keys_str_mv AT fariaesilvaandreluis bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions
AT fabiaomayramelo bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions
AT sfalcinravanaangelini bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions
AT desouzamenesesmurilo bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions
AT santosfilhopaulocesarfreitas bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions
AT soarespaulovinicius bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions
AT martinsluisroberto bondstrengthofonestepadhesivesunderdifferentsubstratemoistureconditions