Cargando…

Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study

Aerosol delivery of Iloprost is a promising therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to determine the output of an ultrasonic nebulizer in different ventilation set-ups at the tip of different endotracheal tubes. METHOD: In set-up A, an ultrasonic nebulizer was connected directly to the endot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winterhalter, Michael, Bund, Michael, Khaladj, Nawid, Hagl, Christian, Simon, Andre, Hoy, Ludwig, Piepenbrock, Siegfried, Rahe-Meyer, Niels
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920888
_version_ 1782172808054308864
author Winterhalter, Michael
Bund, Michael
Khaladj, Nawid
Hagl, Christian
Simon, Andre
Hoy, Ludwig
Piepenbrock, Siegfried
Rahe-Meyer, Niels
author_facet Winterhalter, Michael
Bund, Michael
Khaladj, Nawid
Hagl, Christian
Simon, Andre
Hoy, Ludwig
Piepenbrock, Siegfried
Rahe-Meyer, Niels
author_sort Winterhalter, Michael
collection PubMed
description Aerosol delivery of Iloprost is a promising therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to determine the output of an ultrasonic nebulizer in different ventilation set-ups at the tip of different endotracheal tubes. METHOD: In set-up A, an ultrasonic nebulizer was connected directly to the endotracheal tube. In set-up B, the nebulizer was incorporated into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit; a bypass arrangement allowed to selectively direct the exspiratory air discharged from the model lung. The test lungs were ventilated through a standard endotracheal tube (ET) and through a double-lumen tube (DLT). The nebulizer was filled with 5 ml of a Tc-99m 0.9%-NaCl solution. After nebulization, distribution of radioactivity was detected by gamma scintigraphy. RESULTS: Set-up A, ventilation in volume-controlled mode (VCV) via an ET: Delivered dose (1.61 ± 0.41 ml), nebulization time 10.13 ± 1.71 min. Set-up A, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), via a DLT: Delivered dose (1.33 ± 0.88 ml), nebulization time 13.27 ± 2.58 min. Set-up B, VCV mode via an ET: Delivered dose (1.57 ± 0.44 ml), nebulization time (25.9 ± 3.8 min). Set-up B, PCV mode, via a DLT: Delivered dose (1.3 ± 0.17 ml), nebulization time (25.6 ± 4.0 min). Set-up B did not yield a significantly higher output (p < 0.05), but the nebulization time was significantly longer (p > 0.05) compared with set-up A. CONCLUSION: Set-ups which involve connecting the nebulizer directly to an ET or a DLT exhibit sufficient output of aerosol and short nebulization times.
format Text
id pubmed-2761175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27611752009-11-17 Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study Winterhalter, Michael Bund, Michael Khaladj, Nawid Hagl, Christian Simon, Andre Hoy, Ludwig Piepenbrock, Siegfried Rahe-Meyer, Niels Drug Des Devel Ther Opinion Aerosol delivery of Iloprost is a promising therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to determine the output of an ultrasonic nebulizer in different ventilation set-ups at the tip of different endotracheal tubes. METHOD: In set-up A, an ultrasonic nebulizer was connected directly to the endotracheal tube. In set-up B, the nebulizer was incorporated into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator circuit; a bypass arrangement allowed to selectively direct the exspiratory air discharged from the model lung. The test lungs were ventilated through a standard endotracheal tube (ET) and through a double-lumen tube (DLT). The nebulizer was filled with 5 ml of a Tc-99m 0.9%-NaCl solution. After nebulization, distribution of radioactivity was detected by gamma scintigraphy. RESULTS: Set-up A, ventilation in volume-controlled mode (VCV) via an ET: Delivered dose (1.61 ± 0.41 ml), nebulization time 10.13 ± 1.71 min. Set-up A, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), via a DLT: Delivered dose (1.33 ± 0.88 ml), nebulization time 13.27 ± 2.58 min. Set-up B, VCV mode via an ET: Delivered dose (1.57 ± 0.44 ml), nebulization time (25.9 ± 3.8 min). Set-up B, PCV mode, via a DLT: Delivered dose (1.3 ± 0.17 ml), nebulization time (25.6 ± 4.0 min). Set-up B did not yield a significantly higher output (p < 0.05), but the nebulization time was significantly longer (p > 0.05) compared with set-up A. CONCLUSION: Set-ups which involve connecting the nebulizer directly to an ET or a DLT exhibit sufficient output of aerosol and short nebulization times. Dove Medical Press 2009-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2761175/ /pubmed/19920888 Text en © 2008 Winterhalter et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion
Winterhalter, Michael
Bund, Michael
Khaladj, Nawid
Hagl, Christian
Simon, Andre
Hoy, Ludwig
Piepenbrock, Siegfried
Rahe-Meyer, Niels
Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
title Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
title_full Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
title_fullStr Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
title_short Aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
title_sort aerosol delivery by an ultrasonic nebulizer during different mechanical ventilation settings in a lung model – a pilot study
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19920888
work_keys_str_mv AT winterhaltermichael aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT bundmichael aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT khaladjnawid aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT haglchristian aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT simonandre aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT hoyludwig aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT piepenbrocksiegfried aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy
AT rahemeyerniels aerosoldeliverybyanultrasonicnebulizerduringdifferentmechanicalventilationsettingsinalungmodelapilotstudy