Cargando…

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic design for the use in primary total knee arthroplasty has evolved into designs that preserve the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and those in which the ligament is routinely sacrificed (posterior stabilized). In patients with a functional PCL the decision which design is cho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Boom, Lennard GH, Brouwer, Reinoud W, van den Akker-Scheek, Inge, Bulstra, Sjoerd K, van Raaij, Jos JAM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-119
_version_ 1782172824067112960
author van den Boom, Lennard GH
Brouwer, Reinoud W
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
van Raaij, Jos JAM
author_facet van den Boom, Lennard GH
Brouwer, Reinoud W
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
van Raaij, Jos JAM
author_sort van den Boom, Lennard GH
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prosthetic design for the use in primary total knee arthroplasty has evolved into designs that preserve the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and those in which the ligament is routinely sacrificed (posterior stabilized). In patients with a functional PCL the decision which design is chosen depends largely on the favour and training of the surgeon. The objective of this study is to determine whether the patient's perceived outcome and speed of recovery differs between a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients who are admitted for primary unilateral TKA due to primary osteoarthrosis are included when the following inclusion criteria are met: non-fixed fixed varus or valgus deformity less than 10 degrees, age between 55 and 85 years, body mass index less than 35 kg/m(2 )and ASA score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) I or II. Patients are randomized in 2 groups. Patients in the posterior cruciate retaining group will receive a prosthesis with a posterior cut-out for the posterior cruciate ligament and relatively flat topography. In patients allocated to the posterior stabilized group, in which the posterior cruciate ligament is excised, the design may substitute for this function by an intercondylar tibial prominence that articulates with the femur in flexion. Measurements will take place preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. At all measurement points patient's perceived outcome will be assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcome measures are quality of life (SF-36) and physician reported functional status and range of motion as determined with the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS). DISCUSSION: In the current practice both posterior cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized designs for total knee arthroplasty are being used. To date no studies have been performed determining whether there is a difference in patient's perceived outcome between the two designs. Additionally, there is a lack of studies determining the speed of recovery in both designs as most studies only determine the final outcome. This randomised controlled study has been designed to determine whether the patient's perceived outcome and speed of recovery differs between a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR1673).
format Text
id pubmed-2761294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27612942009-10-14 Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial van den Boom, Lennard GH Brouwer, Reinoud W van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Bulstra, Sjoerd K van Raaij, Jos JAM BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Prosthetic design for the use in primary total knee arthroplasty has evolved into designs that preserve the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and those in which the ligament is routinely sacrificed (posterior stabilized). In patients with a functional PCL the decision which design is chosen depends largely on the favour and training of the surgeon. The objective of this study is to determine whether the patient's perceived outcome and speed of recovery differs between a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients who are admitted for primary unilateral TKA due to primary osteoarthrosis are included when the following inclusion criteria are met: non-fixed fixed varus or valgus deformity less than 10 degrees, age between 55 and 85 years, body mass index less than 35 kg/m(2 )and ASA score (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) I or II. Patients are randomized in 2 groups. Patients in the posterior cruciate retaining group will receive a prosthesis with a posterior cut-out for the posterior cruciate ligament and relatively flat topography. In patients allocated to the posterior stabilized group, in which the posterior cruciate ligament is excised, the design may substitute for this function by an intercondylar tibial prominence that articulates with the femur in flexion. Measurements will take place preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. At all measurement points patient's perceived outcome will be assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcome measures are quality of life (SF-36) and physician reported functional status and range of motion as determined with the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS). DISCUSSION: In the current practice both posterior cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized designs for total knee arthroplasty are being used. To date no studies have been performed determining whether there is a difference in patient's perceived outcome between the two designs. Additionally, there is a lack of studies determining the speed of recovery in both designs as most studies only determine the final outcome. This randomised controlled study has been designed to determine whether the patient's perceived outcome and speed of recovery differs between a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR1673). BioMed Central 2009-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2761294/ /pubmed/19793397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-119 Text en Copyright © 2009 van den Boom et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van den Boom, Lennard GH
Brouwer, Reinoud W
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
van Raaij, Jos JAM
Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
title Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-119
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenboomlennardgh retentionoftheposteriorcruciateligamentversustheposteriorstabilizeddesignintotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT brouwerreinoudw retentionoftheposteriorcruciateligamentversustheposteriorstabilizeddesignintotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vandenakkerscheekinge retentionoftheposteriorcruciateligamentversustheposteriorstabilizeddesignintotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT bulstrasjoerdk retentionoftheposteriorcruciateligamentversustheposteriorstabilizeddesignintotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vanraaijjosjam retentionoftheposteriorcruciateligamentversustheposteriorstabilizeddesignintotalkneearthroplastyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial