Cargando…

Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things

BACKGROUND: The concept of a tree of life is prevalent in the evolutionary literature. It stems from attempting to obtain a grand unified natural system that reflects a recurrent process of species and lineage splittings for all forms of life. Traditionally, the discipline of systematics operates in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bapteste, Eric, O'Malley, Maureen A, Beiko, Robert G, Ereshefsky, Marc, Gogarten, J Peter, Franklin-Hall, Laura, Lapointe, François-Joseph, Dupré, John, Dagan, Tal, Boucher, Yan, Martin, William
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19788731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-4-34
_version_ 1782172825976569856
author Bapteste, Eric
O'Malley, Maureen A
Beiko, Robert G
Ereshefsky, Marc
Gogarten, J Peter
Franklin-Hall, Laura
Lapointe, François-Joseph
Dupré, John
Dagan, Tal
Boucher, Yan
Martin, William
author_facet Bapteste, Eric
O'Malley, Maureen A
Beiko, Robert G
Ereshefsky, Marc
Gogarten, J Peter
Franklin-Hall, Laura
Lapointe, François-Joseph
Dupré, John
Dagan, Tal
Boucher, Yan
Martin, William
author_sort Bapteste, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of a tree of life is prevalent in the evolutionary literature. It stems from attempting to obtain a grand unified natural system that reflects a recurrent process of species and lineage splittings for all forms of life. Traditionally, the discipline of systematics operates in a similar hierarchy of bifurcating (sometimes multifurcating) categories. The assumption of a universal tree of life hinges upon the process of evolution being tree-like throughout all forms of life and all of biological time. In multicellular eukaryotes, the molecular mechanisms and species-level population genetics of variation do indeed mainly cause a tree-like structure over time. In prokaryotes, they do not. Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things, and we need to treat them as such, rather than extrapolating from macroscopic life to prokaryotes. In the following we will consider this circumstance from philosophical, scientific, and epistemological perspectives, surmising that phylogeny opted for a single model as a holdover from the Modern Synthesis of evolution. RESULTS: It was far easier to envision and defend the concept of a universal tree of life before we had data from genomes. But the belief that prokaryotes are related by such a tree has now become stronger than the data to support it. The monistic concept of a single universal tree of life appears, in the face of genome data, increasingly obsolete. This traditional model to describe evolution is no longer the most scientifically productive position to hold, because of the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved. Forcing a single bifurcating scheme onto prokaryotic evolution disregards the non-tree-like nature of natural variation among prokaryotes and accounts for only a minority of observations from genomes. CONCLUSION: Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things. Hence we will briefly set out alternative models to the tree of life to study their evolution. Ultimately, the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved, such as the discontinuity of the process of evolution across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide, summons forth a pluralistic approach to studying evolution. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Ford Doolittle, John Logsdon and Nicolas Galtier.
format Text
id pubmed-2761302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27613022009-10-14 Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things Bapteste, Eric O'Malley, Maureen A Beiko, Robert G Ereshefsky, Marc Gogarten, J Peter Franklin-Hall, Laura Lapointe, François-Joseph Dupré, John Dagan, Tal Boucher, Yan Martin, William Biol Direct Review BACKGROUND: The concept of a tree of life is prevalent in the evolutionary literature. It stems from attempting to obtain a grand unified natural system that reflects a recurrent process of species and lineage splittings for all forms of life. Traditionally, the discipline of systematics operates in a similar hierarchy of bifurcating (sometimes multifurcating) categories. The assumption of a universal tree of life hinges upon the process of evolution being tree-like throughout all forms of life and all of biological time. In multicellular eukaryotes, the molecular mechanisms and species-level population genetics of variation do indeed mainly cause a tree-like structure over time. In prokaryotes, they do not. Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things, and we need to treat them as such, rather than extrapolating from macroscopic life to prokaryotes. In the following we will consider this circumstance from philosophical, scientific, and epistemological perspectives, surmising that phylogeny opted for a single model as a holdover from the Modern Synthesis of evolution. RESULTS: It was far easier to envision and defend the concept of a universal tree of life before we had data from genomes. But the belief that prokaryotes are related by such a tree has now become stronger than the data to support it. The monistic concept of a single universal tree of life appears, in the face of genome data, increasingly obsolete. This traditional model to describe evolution is no longer the most scientifically productive position to hold, because of the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved. Forcing a single bifurcating scheme onto prokaryotic evolution disregards the non-tree-like nature of natural variation among prokaryotes and accounts for only a minority of observations from genomes. CONCLUSION: Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things. Hence we will briefly set out alternative models to the tree of life to study their evolution. Ultimately, the plurality of evolutionary patterns and mechanisms involved, such as the discontinuity of the process of evolution across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide, summons forth a pluralistic approach to studying evolution. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Ford Doolittle, John Logsdon and Nicolas Galtier. BioMed Central 2009-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2761302/ /pubmed/19788731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-4-34 Text en Copyright © 2009 Bapteste et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Bapteste, Eric
O'Malley, Maureen A
Beiko, Robert G
Ereshefsky, Marc
Gogarten, J Peter
Franklin-Hall, Laura
Lapointe, François-Joseph
Dupré, John
Dagan, Tal
Boucher, Yan
Martin, William
Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
title Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
title_full Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
title_fullStr Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
title_full_unstemmed Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
title_short Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
title_sort prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2761302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19788731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-4-34
work_keys_str_mv AT baptesteeric prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT omalleymaureena prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT beikorobertg prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT ereshefskymarc prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT gogartenjpeter prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT franklinhalllaura prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT lapointefrancoisjoseph prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT duprejohn prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT dagantal prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT boucheryan prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings
AT martinwilliam prokaryoticevolutionandthetreeoflifearetwodifferentthings